clickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9460 posts, RR: 72 Reply 1, posted (2 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 3768 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW PHOTO SCREENER
That photo is unlevel, the highlights are blown, and the motive is questionable.
captainstefan From United States of America, joined May 2007, 341 posts, RR: 0 Reply 6, posted (2 years 2 months 1 week 5 days ago) and read 3387 times:
Reminds me of an old Nikon School ad in the Sept. 1993 NatGeo that had the famous picture of Nessie with the caption: "Some people see a monster. We see improper metering, poor lens selection, and a total lack of composition." - And, sadly (depending on how one looks at it), both this and the Canon ad are how I have begun to think over the past year or so
pilotalltheway From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2008, 247 posts, RR: 0 Reply 8, posted (2 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 3302 times:
Oh, please. You really think Canon didn't realise they had low contrast, over blown highlights, and poor levelling.
stevenlee505 From United States of America, joined Dec 2009, 68 posts, RR: 0 Reply 9, posted (2 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 3204 times:
Can someone explain the caption to me? Is it because f/8 and 1/250s is the ideal setting to shoot in that setting?
spencer From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2004, 1624 posts, RR: 19 Reply 11, posted (2 years 2 months 1 week 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 2979 times:
Quoting stevenlee505 (Reply 9): Can someone explain the caption to me? Is it because f/8 and 1/250s is the ideal setting to shoot in that setting?
No, I think it's the photographer visualising a photograph rather than seeing his girlfriend in front of him.
Quoting trvyyz (Reply 10): I don't see anything wrong with that photo. The photo looks how the photographer visualized it.
Tbh, I can't see much wrong with it either given the kind of shot it is and the light it's taken in. Yes, it's lacking contrast but that's shot into the Sun, by default there's going to be minimum contrast anyway. Level? What you levelling it against? Hotspots? Again, it's into Sun. That's gotta be the hottest spot going, no?! 'Spose it just goes to show not everyone does it the A.net way....
Having said that it's a crap picture haha.
Spence.
EOS1D4, 7D, 30D, 100-400/4.5-5.6 L IS USM, 70-200/2.8 L IS2 USM, 17-40 f4 L USM, 24-105 f4 L IS USM, 85 f1.8 USM
JS98010 From United States of America, joined Apr 2011, 3 posts, RR: 0 Reply 13, posted (2 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 2919 times:
As long as we're delving into the minds of photographers, I wonder what the photographers at Playboy, Penthouse, et. al. are thinking about while they work with their subjects?
vivekman2006 From India, joined May 2006, 517 posts, RR: 3 Reply 15, posted (2 years 2 months 1 week 11 hours ago) and read 2857 times:
Quoting JS98010 (Reply 13): As long as we're delving into the minds of photographers, I wonder what the photographers at Playboy, Penthouse, et. al. are thinking about while they work with their subjects?
Something like this - I stand in front of beautiful and voluptous nude women and think - F5.6 at 1/200....
Sponsor Message: 
From Canada, joined Aug 2007, 2546 posts, 
From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9460 posts, 
From Sweden, joined Jan 2005, 1340 posts, 
From Netherlands, joined Jan 2004, 2235 posts, 
From Bangladesh, joined Apr 2011, 1 posts, 
From Kazakhstan, joined Feb 2010, 188 posts, 
and 
From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2008, 247 posts, 
From India, joined May 2006, 517 posts, 
From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 545 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
