Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Nikkor 80-400mm Focus Speed  
User currently offlineail5901 From American Samoa, joined Aug 2011, 4 posts, RR: 0
Posted (3 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 3807 times:

I hear the nikkor 80-400mm is a little slow to focus, and thus not suitable for sports. I am thinking it may still be fast enough to catch good airline shots, though, and the 400mm length on my DX body is quite appealing for the price and my usual spotting location.

Is the focus speed going to kill it, or should I be in good shape?

9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineail5901 From American Samoa, joined Aug 2011, 4 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (3 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 3797 times:

Totally forgot to mention that its competition, for my dollar, is the 70-300mm, which costs a LOT less.

User currently offlinescbriml From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2003, 12795 posts, RR: 46
Reply 2, posted (3 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 3787 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting ail5901 (Thread starter):
Is the focus speed going to kill it, or should I be in good shape?

The AF is slow when compared to AF-S Nikon lenses (but then, many are!) If you're shooting airliners on approach or departure, it should be OK most of the time. If you're chasing a fast jet around the sky at an air show, then it will struggle - the slowness of regaining focus will notice.

The lens is more than adequate in good light, but in poorer light it can struggle to produce reliable results.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Steve Brimley
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Steve Brimley


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Steve Brimley
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Steve Brimley




Time flies like an arrow, but fruit flies like a banana!
User currently offlinealevik From Canada, joined Mar 2009, 1058 posts, RR: 9
Reply 3, posted (3 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 3749 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

I'll throw my support behind this lens for aviation photography. I'd say a good 70-80% of my 1800 images on anet are with this lens. For airplanes that generally travel in a straight, predictable line, it works just fine focus wise. Even in early morning or late evening panning with 1/15 to 1/80 I have no problems with focus.


Improvise, adapt, overcome.
User currently offlinen314as From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (3 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 3677 times:

You do not need autofocus or vibration control for airliner action shots. Pre focus on the area to shoot then concentrate on panning the plane in that area. The old fashion way manually focusing is the correct way to do these. Autofocus could be tricky and sometimes you will lose your shot. They have a mind of its own. Steady hands and concentration is all you need.

User currently offlineDerekf From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 914 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (3 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 3645 times:

Quoting n314as (Reply 4):
Pre focus on the area to shoot then concentrate on panning the plane in that area.

How do you focus on an area of sky that you think the aeroplane might be in?

I used the Nikon 80-400mm at an airshow and had no problems with the autofocus. I don't recall many problems with focus errors on any of the autofocus lenses I use. I got plenty of focus errors in the old days with manual focus though.



Whatever.......
User currently offlinescbriml From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2003, 12795 posts, RR: 46
Reply 6, posted (3 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 3609 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Derekf (Reply 5):
I don't recall many problems with focus errors on any of the autofocus lenses I use.

In my experience, the problem is if you're trying to follow a fast jet across the sky and using AF-C mode, if the lens loses it's lock on the plane, it will hunt to regain focus. Given the relatively slow focus performance of the 80-400VR, it can take a relatively long time to regain focus.

Maybe I'm just crap at following F-16s across the sky?   



Time flies like an arrow, but fruit flies like a banana!
User currently offlineantoinepsaila From Malta, joined Dec 2006, 30 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (3 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 3607 times:

I heard that Nikon are going to announce the upgraded 80 400 at next PMA. Anyone heard something about it cause with AF-S this lens will be a great lens for aviation photography.

User currently offlineviv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 3142 posts, RR: 28
Reply 8, posted (3 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 3600 times:

Yes, this lens is slow to focus, but it is usable for civil aircraft on approach or departure. There is a switch on the lens barrel that limits focus range. This helps a lot.

I have used the lens at airshows, with generally satisfactory results.

It is not the sharpest lens around, a 300 or 400mm prime will be much sharper.

[Edited 2011-08-31 11:40:10]


Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
User currently offlineSFO2SVO From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 403 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (3 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 3377 times:

Quoting viv (Reply 8):
It is not the sharpest lens around, a 300 or 400mm prime will be much sharper.

My 80-400 needs to be at F8 or higher to be sharp at over 250mm.
Otherwise - good lens. Don't really see any affordable alternative.



318-19-20-21 332 343 717 727 737-234578 743-4 752 763 772 D9/10 M11/8x/90 F70 RJ85 ATR72 SF340 E120 TU34/54 IL18/62/86/9
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Nikkor 80-400mm ED VR Opinions posted Wed Jan 18 2006 21:56:31 by Shaggy
Sigma 80-400mm OS Vs. Nikkor 80-400mm VR posted Thu Jul 14 2005 05:03:08 by Yanqui67
Nikkor 80-400MM Trouble/help! posted Mon Nov 8 2004 04:32:21 by FlyingColors
AF VR Zoom-Nikkor 80-400mm F/4.5-5.6D posted Mon Dec 11 2000 20:18:48 by Mikephotos
Just How Slow Is The 80-400mm VR Nikkor? posted Wed May 31 2006 07:46:54 by IAH777
Nikkor 200-400mm Demonstration Video posted Fri Jan 25 2008 01:13:54 by Jawed
Nikkor 80-400VR...mode 1 Or 2 posted Mon Aug 21 2006 15:43:04 by Nucky
My Thoughts On The Sigma 80-400mm OS Lens (Nikon). posted Tue Dec 13 2005 21:49:48 by Yanqui67
Sigma 80-400mm OS -- Anyone? posted Tue Dec 9 2003 07:11:31 by Rotor1
Tokina 80-400mm Lens posted Tue Jan 15 2002 23:23:34 by LGB Photos