Possibility of opening up to f/4. I guess the release of something like this is certain to mean that the 200-400 will be at the price people are looking at.. And I wonder if this will be a nice upgrade from the 100-400 current.
Rotate From Switzerland, joined Feb 2003, 1479 posts, RR: 18 Reply 1, posted (1 year 9 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 3597 times:
I believe the 100-400 MkII only when I see it in real live ... People have been talking about that upgrade for years. I would buy one right away.
And yes ... this would also mean that the mentioned prices on the 200-400 are for real, which was obvious for me, cuase we are talking about a totally different lens segment here ...
spencer From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2004, 1624 posts, RR: 19 Reply 2, posted (1 year 9 months 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 3547 times:
Perhaps I'm the only one that loves the current 100-400? Never let me down and always gives me good results at 400. Would an extra stop help me, possibly. Do I need it, no.
Spence
EOS1D4, 7D, 30D, 100-400/4.5-5.6 L IS USM, 70-200/2.8 L IS2 USM, 17-40 f4 L USM, 24-105 f4 L IS USM, 85 f1.8 USM
NZ107 From New Zealand, joined Jul 2005, 5696 posts, RR: 39 Reply 4, posted (1 year 9 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 3505 times:
Quoting Rotate (Reply 1): I believe the 100-400 MkII only when I see it in real live
Yeah, I think that's the case for just about everyone!
Quoting spencer (Reply 2): Perhaps I'm the only one that loves the current 100-400? Never let me down and always gives me good results at 400. Would an extra stop help me, possibly. Do I need it, no.
I love my 100-400 too, just that the ISO limitations of my camera points towards the advantages of having a better IS system. Then again, if I coupled the lens with a 5DII or something, I doubt I'd be disappointed with what I can achieve with it.