Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Spotting Camera.  
User currently offlineeskillawl From Sweden, joined Jan 2012, 96 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 3661 times:

Hello!

I have recently begun to interest me for aircraft spotting. I have an older SLR that has seen better days, I therefore need a new one.

My question is then whether I need an SLR, or if it will do equally well with a compact camera. The reason why I'm leaning towards a compact camera is because I can not afford right now, or want to waste so much money on a camera.

I've looked around online (I live in Sweden) and I wonder if I can take good pictures of airplanes, for example with:
Fujifilm FinePix S3200
Nicon Coolpix L120
or similar compact cameras with long zoom.

Thanks for the reply! Greetings Eskil (www.b-flying.com)


Photo equipment: Canon EOS 60D | Canon 70-200 F4L USM | Canon 18-55 3:5-5:6 |
9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinemegatop412 From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 316 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (2 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 3655 times:

For static shots you should be fine with the point-and-shoots. You'll have a harder time getting shots accepted here but they'll still be nice shots. It's the airborne/taxying metal(or anything at a great distance) that they really won't do as well with than if you're using an SLR.

User currently offlineeskillawl From Sweden, joined Jan 2012, 96 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (2 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 3645 times:

Okay,) excuse me for asking this, but I do not really understand) - that the images will not be as good when the aircraft is in the air, but as good as they are on the ground or when aircraft are taxiing out?


Photo equipment: Canon EOS 60D | Canon 70-200 F4L USM | Canon 18-55 3:5-5:6 |
User currently offlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 10254 posts, RR: 26
Reply 3, posted (2 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 3634 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

At the end of the day, what kind of camera you choose is solely determined by what you want to use it for.

If you just want some cool-looking airplane photos from good-weather days, and aren't particularly worried about detailed photo quality, then a point-and-shoot may be fine. If you're instead looking for medium-to-high quality photos, and the ability to shoot in different weather and light, then you may want a DSLR.

If you want to upload here, it'll be a lot easier with a DSLR - even a cheap one. But like I said, it's completely up to you and what you want to do with your camera.

Quoting eskillawl (Reply 2):
Okay,) excuse me for asking this, but I do not really understand) - that the images will not be as good when the aircraft is in the air, but as good as they are on the ground or when aircraft are taxiing out?

It's harder to pan well and take a good shot of a fast-moving aircraft with a point-and-shoot camera.



How can I be an admiral without my cap??!
User currently offlineeskillawl From Sweden, joined Jan 2012, 96 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (2 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 3622 times:

Okay, thank you very much!

Are there any of you recommend the Nikon D80? I know it has a number of years old, but it is an inexpensive DSLR.

Does anyone have the Nikon D80 and takes flight card with the one who can tell?

Thank you again!



Photo equipment: Canon EOS 60D | Canon 70-200 F4L USM | Canon 18-55 3:5-5:6 |
User currently offlinephilhyde From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 678 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (2 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 3598 times:

Quoting eskillawl (Reply 4):
Are there any of you recommend the Nikon D80? I know it has a number of years old, but it is an inexpensive DSLR.

I don't see any harm in getting started with a Nikon D80. Of course you'll also need a lens.



HoustonSpotters Admin - Canon junkie - Aviation Nut
User currently offlineGiancavia From Vatican City, joined Feb 2010, 1384 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (2 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 3537 times:

I use a Fuji HS10 Point and shoot.. its apparently a "compact" that does everything a "dslr" does yadda yadda. Its nifty because it has a 30x Zoom which u can operate manually which comes in useful for shooting aircraft from far away on the other hand its sucks alot of the time focusing on fast moving planes and in low light is horrible.

Oh and its not really expensive at all..

Infact I really want to get a DSLR with a badass lense to shoot planes inflight at 40 thousand feet but I have no idea where to start looking. hint hint?


User currently offlinedazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2929 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (2 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 3535 times:

Quoting Giancavia (Reply 6):
Infact I really want to get a DSLR with a badass lense to shoot planes inflight at 40 thousand feet but I have no idea where to start looking. hint hint

You don't need a camera and lens, you need a camera and telescope!

Darren



Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
User currently offlineeskillawl From Sweden, joined Jan 2012, 96 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (2 years 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 3462 times:

Someone who has experience with the Canon 350D? I searched for images to be taken with the camera on a.net and found a whole bunch. Most of the images were of relatively high quality, can of course depend on the lens, but still.

In Swedish Ebay I found a Canon 350D in my city for the 1800 Swedish kronor. Fairly cheap - right? Should I turn to?



Photo equipment: Canon EOS 60D | Canon 70-200 F4L USM | Canon 18-55 3:5-5:6 |
User currently offlinedazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2929 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (2 years 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 3461 times:

Quoting eskillawl (Reply 8):
Someone who has experience with the Canon 350D?

I've had a 350D since 2005 and use it alongside my 50D and think it's a great camera. I'll be using it on an air-to-air shoot in a few weeks, it still delivers the goods. The camera body is less important than the lens. Overall though, it's the person using the equipment that makes the biggest difference. Most camera bodies these days are capable of great things with the right glass.

Darren



Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Best Camera For Spotting? posted Thu Aug 4 2011 03:12:32 by allezerloot
New Camera - Looking For A Good Spotting Lense posted Mon Jun 27 2011 23:24:44 by yp6370
Spotting With A Compact Camera (many Pics) posted Thu Apr 23 2009 16:24:53 by AirCatalonia
Good Camera For Low Altitude Spotting! posted Sat Dec 13 2008 14:04:49 by Virginblue4
Results From First Spotting Trip With New Camera posted Thu Dec 29 2005 22:37:32 by Garri767
Going Spotting Tomorrow With New Camera posted Wed Dec 28 2005 23:53:29 by Garri767
Spotting Scope Or Binoculars + Camera Attachment posted Sat Dec 3 2005 19:37:23 by Shaggy
Best Camera For Spotting? posted Sun Feb 13 2005 22:29:36 by BMI701EGCC
Spotting And Camera Help posted Mon Oct 25 2004 22:23:59 by Karan69
Looking For A Digital Camera For Spotting posted Sun Oct 24 2004 22:56:04 by SmithAir747