evall95 From Australia, joined Aug 2011, 309 posts, RR: 0 Posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 3894 times:
I was just looking at getting a tripod for aviation photography and wondering which would be a good tripod for me to improve my photography skills. keep in my I am only 16 so I am not the wealthiest guy around.
astro777lover From United States of America, joined Nov 2008, 212 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 3884 times:
One thing I have read and learned about tripod is get the best you can afford now. Getting the $30 Walmart tripod isn't the best thing. Tripods will last a long time and as you grow as a photographer, later you can always upgrade.
I am currently 18 and after saving up for awhile i bought an pretty expensive tripod, around $200. What type of gear do you currently have and what type of pictures are you trying to get?
Canon EOS 450D, Canon 70-200L 2.8 IS USM, Canon 580EX II
On the size point, not really the less the better. In some parts in the world (for example Finland) you need very high tripods to reach over the fence to get the cool night shot. So consider that fact, how much height does your local airport(s) require.
I bought myself Slik's 700DX, and I have to use it as sort of monopod when trying to shoot over the fence.
Andrew50 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 146 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 3814 times:
I do a ton of night shooting and I use the Manfrotto 055CXPRO3 carbon fiber tripod, with a Manfrotto ball head. I highly recommend this tripod! Before I got this tripod, I used the Manfrotto 475 Pro Tripod. The 475 is a great tripod, but it weighs about 6 pounds more than the carbon fiber. In my opinion the carbon fiber is just as rigid as the 475 which is made out of aluminum. The other plus with 055 is it is much, much easier to travel with. The biggest set up I use with the 055 is a Canon 40D with a Canon 100-400L IS lens, which it handles fine. I know you talked about the money, but in my opinion it might be best to save up and get what you really want. I wished I had went with the carbon fiber as my first choice, but I though the heavier the tripod the better, which is not true, in my opinion. Just my 2 cents.
CaptainKramer From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2012, 239 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (3 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 3553 times:
I bought a tripod recently from Calemut a photgraphic chain here in the UK it cost £55 and found it was just the right size when collapsed to fit in my carrybag and not give the game away that I was carrying expensive camera gear.
When doing time lapse shooting at night with all 3 legs spread I found the tripod a little too lite so I had to press down on it to stop it shaking when a big jet passed over head trailing a strong vortex for certain shots. When there is no car traffic passing by you can hear the coolest sound ever of air molecules being whipped tight by the vortex, it sounds like a whiplash slowed down, has anyone else heard this?
But I digress the other thing I recommend using the tripod is for day shots, but bring the legs together at a point and treat it like a monopod, it will guarantee very crisp in focus shots more often, especially three quarter head on shots where the aircraft nose is in the top left or right hand corner. Before using the tripod the nose often looked soft or blurred, no more when using a tripod, plus using your tripod monopod style allows easier panning shots. If you want to pan and tilt just set your pan or tilt locks until they bite enough to allow smooth movement. It took a few hours to perfect the technique, without compromising any of my shot angles I always used before.