Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Which One Of These Lens Is Best?  
User currently offlinekl692 From Canada, joined Feb 2006, 675 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 3770 times:

I am planing to buy one of this lens and I would like to know which one will be best for spotting. the lens are
Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 USM IS Zoom Lens
And the
Canon EF-S 17-85mm IS USM zoom lens f/4-5.6

I don't know much about lens so I thought I will ask the experts here on which they think is the best out of the two.

Currently I have the Canon 55-250mm Telephoto Lens with I.S and the Canon 18-55mm lens without I.S

Thanks


A310, A330,A346,B73H, B747,B772,B77W,CRJ
9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 9400 posts, RR: 27
Reply 1, posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 3742 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting kl692 (Thread starter):
I am planing to buy one of this lens and I would like to know which one will be best for spotting. the lens are
Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 USM IS Zoom Lens
And the
Canon EF-S 17-85mm IS USM zoom lens f/4-5.6

Out of curiosity, why those two lenses? You already have those zoom ranges covered, and I doubt you'll see a large increase in quality. The 18-55 is actually a pretty sharp lens, and the 55-250 is OK up to around 180mm.

Anyway, just wondering. I bought a EF 70-300 IS USM to replace my 55-250 awhile ago, mostly for the extra length. But quality really wasn't THAT much better.



"Two and a Half Men" was filmed in front of a live ostrich.
User currently offlinekl692 From Canada, joined Feb 2006, 675 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 3710 times:

Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 1):
Out of curiosity, why those two lenses? You already have those zoom ranges covered, and I doubt you'll see a large increase in quality. The 18-55 is actually a pretty sharp lens, and the 55-250 is OK up to around 180mm.

I a looking into those because I believe that they both wide lens



A310, A330,A346,B73H, B747,B772,B77W,CRJ
User currently offlineJWM From Finland, joined Feb 2012, 6 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 3709 times:

Maybe for extra-quality you need to buy non-IS version of 70-200 F/4 L. It is supersharp and not very expensive, especially if you buy it second-hand. Here in Finland they cost from 400€ upwards, so basically in the same category as the 17-85 IS.
And yeah, I know you think: "I'm going to lose 50mm", but in real-world you gain some usable mm:s. EF-s 55-250 IS is not usable above lets say 170mm. 70-200 is very usable all the way to the 200mm.  


User currently offlinekl692 From Canada, joined Feb 2006, 675 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 3702 times:

Quoting JWM (Reply 3):
Maybe for extra-quality you need to buy non-IS version of 70-200 F/4 L. It is supersharp and not very expensive, especially if you buy it second-hand. Here in Finland they cost from 400€ upwards, so basically in the same category as the 17-85 IS.

I have been looking at one of those too. I have seen a couple of use ones from $500 to $600 Canadian. I am not really worry about the extra 50mm as you said.



A310, A330,A346,B73H, B747,B772,B77W,CRJ
User currently offlineshufflemoomin From Denmark, joined Jun 2010, 467 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 3699 times:

Quoting kl692 (Reply 2):
I a looking into those because I believe that they both wide lens

You've lost me completely. Yes, they're both considered wide angle lenses, but neither is any wider than what your kit lens is already providing. Why would you want a wide angle lens for spotting anyway? Unless you're planning to take every image directly under the approach path close to the airport or you're shooting down on the apron, a wide-angle lens is next to useless for spotting. The 50-250mm IS lens you have is fine for most purposes and I get the suspicion it's more than ample for the level you're at.


User currently offlinekl692 From Canada, joined Feb 2006, 675 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 3695 times:

well it also have to do with the fact that I don't want to be changing lens all the time. I just thought that 28 to 135mm might be the all in one lens for me.

And with the 250mm sometimes I end up with soft spots on the pictures

[Edited 2012-02-26 04:21:08]


A310, A330,A346,B73H, B747,B772,B77W,CRJ
User currently offlinedazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2822 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 3688 times:

Quoting kl692 (Thread starter):
I am planing to buy one of this lens and I would like to know which one will be best for spotting.

I think you need to decide what focal lengths you need / want first before deciding on a specific lens. What do you need at your local airport or where you are planning on going to? It's better to specificy your needs first then assess your options rather than look at lenses based on performance and choose one that way. You need the right tool for the job you'll be applying it to.

Darren



Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
User currently offlineTomskii From Belgium, joined May 2011, 464 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 3656 times:

Is it just me, or should I smack myself to the head because this guy wants to buy a lens that he already has covered?


Nikon D90 + Nikkor f4.5-5.6 18-105mm + Tamron f4-5.6 70-300mm
User currently offlineshufflemoomin From Denmark, joined Jun 2010, 467 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 3652 times:

Quoting kl692 (Reply 6):
fact that I don't want to be changing lens all the time

Once again, you've completely lost me. In what spotting situation would you have to change constantly between the kit lens and the 55-250? Also, if you think a 28-135mm lens will avoid having to change lenses, how often are you shooting in the 28-55 range that you would lose by using the 55-250mm. You're going to have to fill us in on what situations you're trying to shoot because I don't have a damn clue what situation would require the solutions you're proposing.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Which One Of These Two Is Worth A Upload? posted Mon Jun 25 2007 19:17:01 by KLM772ER
Which Of These Cameras Is The Best? posted Tue Jul 20 2004 01:48:42 by 737doctor
Which Of The Two Is Best On Your Screen? posted Sun Jun 18 2006 08:10:20 by Frippe
Incorrect Date On One Of These Shots? posted Tue Mar 16 2010 08:20:56 by Spiderguy252
Any Possibility On One Of These? posted Tue Sep 18 2007 16:40:05 by Glapira
Can I Save One Of These? posted Mon Feb 19 2007 04:56:56 by SNATH
Price Query, One Of These Days I Will Learn... posted Tue Sep 6 2005 16:13:25 by Fiveholer
Any Of These Lens Name Brands Work For Planes? posted Sun Nov 10 2002 00:31:26 by CcrlR
The Quality Of These Images Is Low... posted Wed Dec 13 2000 20:47:06 by Nosewheel
Which Of The Two Is The Best One? posted Wed Mar 1 2006 07:32:36 by Frippe