Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
550D+17-85 Vs. 60D  
User currently offlineLH234 From Germany, joined May 2009, 13 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 4 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 3851 times:

Hey guys,

I have some problems with my 450D (processing takes really long,"start-up" fails although it's fully loaded,the shutter-relase get's stucked while shooting)... I was already in contactwith Canon Germany but a reparation would be very expensive.

Now I wanted to ask you guys what's better: Buy a relatively cheap EOS 550D )and maybe spend the remaing amount on a 17-85 as I don't own a good lens in this category) or buy a 60D from the upper series?

We had a discussion here before about the 60D , and you guys told me that spending money on lenses is the more diplomatic way than investing in a expensive body.
I would use my Canon 100-400L lens on the bodies.

The 550D is similar to the 60D (18MP,movie-function ecc.) , so I am between this two cameras.
I really agonize about this decision and just wanted you to give me some support about it so that I know that I make the right decision!


Thanks in advance,


Marius

3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCaptainKramer From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2012, 225 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (2 years 4 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 3840 times:

Hi LH234,

I have a Canon 60D that came with a Canon EFS 17-85mm lens. I am happy with my 60D so long as I don't look at the results from a Canon 7D, even if it just by looking at the LCD display, WOW, but seriously IMHO a Canon 60D is very good for the price. However I have found in certain instances that the 17-85mm at full wide shows up chromatic aberation which often ruins the shot, that not even software can save. Just my 2cents/pence worth.


User currently offlineJWM From Finland, joined Feb 2012, 6 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (2 years 4 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 3839 times:

In that situation, get the 60D. I've got 550D, and it's not very "sporty" little camera. IQ is great for the price, but at 3,7fps and buffer of 6 raw:s it's not really a aviation photography tool. You win in speed and handling if you take the 60D, IQ is similar and so are the high-ISO:s.

Hope this helped
/JWM  


User currently offlineafterburner From Indonesia, joined Jun 2005, 1209 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (2 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 3747 times:

From what I've read in reviews and forums, Canon 17-85mm is not a good lens (the 15-85mm is a better lens). And the 60D is a class above 550D.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
17-40 L Vs. 24-105 L Sharpness posted Tue Feb 26 2008 16:50:02 by SNATH
Canon 17-40 Vs. Sigma 17-35 posted Mon Dec 27 2004 23:50:31 by WorldspotterPL
Canon 17-40L F/4 Vs. Tamron 17-35 F/2.8-4 posted Sun Dec 19 2004 20:29:50 by Mfz
Canon Wide Angles: 16-35L Vs 17-40L posted Thu Feb 10 2005 15:25:23 by Jderden777
17-40 F4 Vs. 17-35 F2.8 posted Tue Jul 20 2004 06:18:01 by Futterman
TCon-17 Vs. B-300 Comparison Available posted Thu May 1 2003 14:19:43 by Voodoo
200 Vs 300mm Nikon Lense Dilemma-which To Buy? posted Tue Feb 28 2012 11:57:13 by skingjack
Canon Eos 60D- Unsatisfactory Results posted Tue Feb 21 2012 15:51:32 by DVAPilot
Nikkor D-series Vs. G-series Lenses posted Mon Feb 13 2012 21:11:47 by 2H4
Sigma 120-400 Vs Tokina 80-400? posted Wed Feb 8 2012 02:24:56 by Sam the Lab