LH234 From Germany, joined May 2009, 13 posts, RR: 0 Posted (3 years 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 4132 times:
I have some problems with my 450D (processing takes really long,"start-up" fails although it's fully loaded,the shutter-relase get's stucked while shooting)... I was already in contactwith Canon Germany but a reparation would be very expensive.
Now I wanted to ask you guys what's better: Buy a relatively cheap EOS 550D )and maybe spend the remaing amount on a 17-85 as I don't own a good lens in this category) or buy a 60D from the upper series?
We had a discussion here before about the 60D , and you guys told me that spending money on lenses is the more diplomatic way than investing in a expensive body.
I would use my Canon 100-400L lens on the bodies.
The 550D is similar to the 60D (18MP,movie-function ecc.) , so I am between this two cameras.
I really agonize about this decision and just wanted you to give me some support about it so that I know that I make the right decision!
CaptainKramer From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2012, 232 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (3 years 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 4121 times:
I have a Canon 60D that came with a Canon EFS 17-85mm lens. I am happy with my 60D so long as I don't look at the results from a Canon 7D, even if it just by looking at the LCD display, WOW, but seriously IMHO a Canon 60D is very good for the price. However I have found in certain instances that the 17-85mm at full wide shows up chromatic aberation which often ruins the shot, that not even software can save. Just my 2cents/pence worth.
JWM From Finland, joined Feb 2012, 6 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (3 years 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 4120 times:
In that situation, get the 60D. I've got 550D, and it's not very "sporty" little camera. IQ is great for the price, but at 3,7fps and buffer of 6 raw:s it's not really a aviation photography tool. You win in speed and handling if you take the 60D, IQ is similar and so are the high-ISO:s.