So my question is now to the more experienced guys (since the two topics above are locked)
Should I give him a copy of my photo? I don't know this Dann and I don't want to be cruel since he claims that he only will use it privately. It's about this photo: http://www.airliners.net/photo/2100176/L/
Tomskii From Belgium, joined May 2011, 467 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (4 years 3 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 6716 times:
As this gentleman says:
"He asked me for 777 shots all the time last year. I sent him maybe 3-4 and then I kind of started ignoring him however he also stopped asking so I guess it was "mutual". I think if he had any intent of misusing them it would've been found out by now as it seems like he asks a large number of a.net uploaders for high-res photos. Therefore if these photos were published anywhere it would've probably been found by now. I think the guy just has a great liking for the 777, much like how I love Tu-134s and use several hundred Tu-134 a.net shots in a random wallpaper generator "
What does annoy me however is the fact that when you email a photographer with the question to get the pic in full HD resolution just so I can use it as my desktop, they answer you I will send it to you soon and you never hear again from them.. So that bothers me, but on the other hand I understand why they aren't sending it as well .
That's enirely your decision. Personally, I sent a polite reply a while ago when asked the same question that he's more than welcome to have a copy of the photo from the site for his collection, but I don't give out high resolution photos.
Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
cpd From Australia, joined Jun 2008, 5058 posts, RR: 34
Reply 7, posted (4 years 3 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 6331 times:
Dannis Bord I think?
I remember him - he does have a huge collection of B777 images which he collects and prints for his own purposes. I haven't been contacted by him since I left the site. I think the fact I have a "buy" function deters that.