Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Airbus A400M - Grizzly Or Atlas?  
User currently offlinegphoto From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 831 posts, RR: 24
Posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 6871 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
DATABASE EDITOR

Hello all,

As you may be aware the A400M was officially named the Atlas on 6th July 2012. Prior to this period it was generally known as the Grizzly and early on it had no name at all.

We have updated the website systems to account for the change in name by creating 3 possibilities for you to choose from for the aircraft type on the Upload page. The following information will help you decide which to use.

1. Prior to 6th July 2012, all aircraft are known as "Airbus A400M Grizzly" on Airliners.net.

2. From 6th of July 2012, some aircraft have received the Atlas logo, others have not. For photos of these, please use "Airbus A400M Atlas" if the aircraft carries the Atlas logo or "Airbus A400M Grizzly" if it carries the Grizzly logo. The logos are typically on the port side of the nose near the crew entry door.

3. If you are really not sure which to use, we have also provided you with the "Airbus A400M ..." option. The Editors will look into these for you once you have had your photograph accepted into the database.

If you have photos in the upload queue that need the name changing, you need do nothing, we will update these for you after they have been accepted.

Best regards,

Jim


Erm, is this thing on?
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineafterburner From Indonesia, joined Jun 2005, 1216 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 6806 times:

'Grizzly' is not a good nickname for a type of aircraft made by a European company because grizzly bears' natural habitat is in North America. 'Atlas' is a much better nickname because it comes from Greek mythology.

User currently offlineptrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3997 posts, RR: 18
Reply 2, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 6762 times:

In my humble opinion it would be better to simply implement the name change. The fact that the A400M was briefly named Grizzly is going to be a mere historical footnote. The B-1 bomber was once named Excalibur and was not named Lancer until 1990, yet the database keeps things simple in that case and many similar cases I'm sure.

Peter 



The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
User currently offlineGPHOTO From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 831 posts, RR: 24
Reply 3, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 6749 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
DATABASE EDITOR

Quoting ptrjong (Reply 2):
In my humble opinion it would be better to simply implement the name change.

Yes, we considered this and decided that, at least at this time, we would not pursue this option.

Quoting ptrjong (Reply 2):
The B-1 bomber was once named Excalibur and was not named Lancer until 1990, yet the database keeps things simple in that case and many similar cases I'm sure.

Nowadays, with so many photographers taking so many quality photographs, it is not so easy to dismiss names that only exist for a short time - we have several hundred Grizzly shots already. Until a few days ago there was no such thing as an Atlas. To strike the right balance between historical accuracy and simplicity can be quite challenging at times. Once an airframe has been in service for several years it becomes easier to understand the history of names and we can revisit the situation.

Who knows if the name Atlas will stick yet? There is nothing to stop it getting changed again!  

Best regards,

Jim



Erm, is this thing on?
User currently offlineptrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3997 posts, RR: 18
Reply 4, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 6730 times:

Quoting GPHOTO (Reply 3):
To strike the right balance between historical accuracy and simplicity can be quite challenging at times.

Yes, I'm sure it is.

Quoting GPHOTO (Reply 3):
Once an airframe has been in service for several years it becomes easier to understand the history of names and we can revisit the situation.

That's very true. Good to hear.

Manufacturers are so opportunistic in changing names and designations all the time without a sense of logic or history, so in some cases I think it it's up to you, the editors, to decide what an aircraft is really called.

Entries like 'Embraer ERJ-190-100LR 190LR' just look horrible in my opinion.

Regards,

Peter 



The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
User currently offlineCaptainKramer From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2012, 226 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 6496 times:

It is my understanding that the name, "Grizzly" was adopted for the A400M during the test phase. Now that the A400M is close to certification a new name, it's official Military/Commercial name has been given as "Atlas" in an official ceremony unveiling at RIAT 2012.

As for the code name given to the A400M by the Russians, I don't know, how about, "Mockba".


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Photographers Or Pilots Or Both. posted Fri May 18 2012 11:21:58 by Cor
Canon 70-200 2.8 + 2x TC III Or 100-400? posted Mon Apr 9 2012 14:47:03 by Silver1SWA
Canon SX220 HS? Or G11/12? posted Mon Apr 9 2012 14:25:12 by JakTrax
Sigma 50-500 Or 150-500 For Hire posted Mon Apr 9 2012 06:41:42 by HarryImp
1970's Or Before Oregon Airport Pictures posted Sat Apr 7 2012 11:17:35 by UnitedFlyer
Compact Or SLR? posted Tue Mar 27 2012 11:58:47 by shishirrk
The Screening Process, A Report Or Interview? posted Thu Feb 23 2012 11:40:11 by axelesgg
Is The Appeal Process Effective Or Even Worthwhile posted Sat Feb 18 2012 18:13:38 by JohnR
Nikkor 70-300mm Or Tamron? posted Fri Feb 10 2012 09:27:16 by Tomskii
Canon 18-55 Is II, 50 F/1.8 II Or 35 F/2? posted Fri Dec 30 2011 17:29:24 by JakTrax