Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Appeal Query  
User currently offlinerelic From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2005, 114 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 4767 times:

Hi

I had an appeal turned down regarding a rejection of an A380 airbus at Farnborough 2010.It was rejected for being common and it was a double.I have noticed which i did point out on the appeal that,there was a double photo of the Malaysian A380 at this years Farnborough display and also the A380 in manufacturers colours (F-WWDD) which was accepted but regarded as "common".Please could anyone please let me know what i am missing here.

Many thanks
Andy

3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinedazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2934 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 4743 times:

Andy,

Common refers to there being a lot of photos of a particular aircraft in the database. It's never used to reject a photo on it's own, it just means there are lots of photos of that aircraft on the database so the quality criteria is that little bit higher than normal. You'll have received other rejection reasons alongside common. If the photo quality is high, common won't be a problem. If you have other photos of the aircraft taken on the same day, of the same side in similar circumstances, ie 2 photos showing the same side both on the ground, double applies. If one is on the ground and the other flying, they aren't classed as double. Does that answer you questions?

Darren



Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
User currently offlinerelic From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2005, 114 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 4737 times:

Quoting dazbo5 (Reply 1):

Thanks Darren,

Yes it does ,didnt realise about the same side of the aircraft showing.My first photo from FAB 10 was pretty much head on but the left side was more apparent as with my second shot in question which was a flypast.
Thanks for that,you live and learn

Cheers
Andy


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 3, posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 4728 times:

Quoting relic (Thread starter):
have noticed which i did point out on the appeal that,there was a double photo of the Malaysian A380 at this years Farnborough display

I didn't handle that appeal, but I saw it. The two images you claimed to be doble were not only different sides but from different photographers. A 'double' rejection only applies to your own photos.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Is The Appeal Process Effective Or Even Worthwhile posted Sat Feb 18 2012 18:13:38 by JohnR
Home Page Top Photos Query posted Fri Aug 13 2010 01:12:15 by Spiderguy252
The Appeal Is Checked By The Person Or A Bot? posted Sun Aug 8 2010 07:40:23 by foxbatavia503
Cannot Appeal posted Thu Apr 8 2010 06:14:24 by flyoverfred
No Appeal Message Received posted Sat Feb 27 2010 04:14:40 by SNATH
7D Level Rejection.... Appeal? posted Sat Sep 5 2009 05:58:44 by StealthZ
Rejection Appeal Link posted Tue May 12 2009 09:14:23 by Sunandan
Question On The Appeal Process posted Mon Jan 5 2009 08:54:09 by Flight
Which Way. CW, CCW Or Appeal? posted Wed Aug 27 2008 05:24:18 by Alibo5NGN
Canon Lens Query posted Sun Aug 24 2008 13:10:24 by Rtl