Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Easier: Take Off Or Landing Of Plane Photos?  
User currently offlineairplane09 From United States of America, joined Oct 2009, 15 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 7465 times:

Which one is easier to take a photo of: a plane landing or taking off?

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinedazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2934 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 7443 times:

Personally, I think approach and landing shots are easier as the flight path is predictable. For take-off shots, the point of rotation differs so it depends on what you're trying to achieve really. Both have their own challenges which makes photography more than just pointing and shooting.

Darren



Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
User currently offlineLOCsta From United States of America, joined Sep 2006, 306 posts, RR: 8
Reply 2, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 7365 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Also on landing speeds are fairly consistent, compared to accelerating speeds during t/o.


Missed 4 chasing 1
User currently offlinemegatop412 From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 316 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 7310 times:

Landing is easier for sure. Speeds are much slower and as already stated flightpath is more predictable.

But, I personally don't tend to care what's easier....I love a good challenge. When I nail a tricky shot I shout 'boom goes the dynamite' and treat myself to a nice meal


User currently offlineairplane09 From United States of America, joined Oct 2009, 15 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 7303 times:

Thanks for your input!

User currently offlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 10338 posts, RR: 26
Reply 5, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 7253 times:

I don't really find either easier. When I'm shooting landings, I'm usually shooting at the In'n'Out, where due to proximity, the airplanes are moving across my field of vision very quickly.

Takeoffs I shoot from either Imperial Hill or the beach, where the aircraft are moving slower, again relative to my field of vision.

That said, with takeoffs you never know exactly where they're going to rotate, or how fast they're going to climb, so planning a shot can be difficult.

Quoting megatop412 (Reply 3):
When I nail a tricky shot I shout 'boom goes the dynamite' and treat myself to a nice meal

  



How can I be an admiral without my cap??!
User currently offlineSoaring1972 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 7242 times:

Quoting megatop412 (Reply 3):
Speeds are much slower

Sure???

I think it is quiet the same if you do not want to have smoking wheels on your picture!

And I think there are more challenging photo situations than takoff or landing.


User currently offlinejpmagero From United States of America, joined Apr 2012, 176 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 7230 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting megatop412 (Reply 3):
I shout 'boom goes the dynamite'

Not too loudly, I hope...wouldn't want some concerned citizen to cause trouble for you  



John M - Aussie expat in the US
User currently offlinecargolex From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 1278 posts, RR: 8
Reply 8, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 7182 times:

Quoting Soaring1972 (Reply 6):
Sure???

Final approach speeds are definitely lower than high-power T/O speeds, although it can vary. MD-11s are going quite fast even when they touch down, while A320s seem to be going quite slowly by comparison (the MD-11 has a very high approach speed in real life, so this isn't just perception).

It also depends on where you are shooting.

At Seatac, you can't really get a rotation shot from anywhere except in the terminal (or possibly air-to-ground), so if you are photographing takeoffs there, the planes will be stowing the gear (or about to be) by the time you see them come into view (the entire airport is on a plateau about 15 meters above all the surrounding roads). That's a bigger challenge than watching them slowly close in on your position at a slower rate of speed.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Is This A Horrible Take Off Or Horrible Landing? posted Thu Sep 5 2002 05:26:01 by QANTAS747-438
Recording Take Off And Landing In The Aircraft...? posted Mon Jul 30 2012 22:50:02 by addictedflyer
Concorde Take-off And Landing At LHR posted Wed Jun 25 2003 20:51:09 by EricBelgium
Photos - 757 Fuel Leak On Take Off posted Mon Feb 22 2010 20:25:17 by compussr
First Take-off Of Airbus A380 In TLS! posted Thu Jan 13 2005 17:47:52 by Tom3
Copyright Of Lockheed Photos posted Fri Aug 5 2011 01:07:50 by brian2000
Lots Of Airbus Photos On Facebook Fan Page posted Thu Jul 21 2011 20:40:13 by Dazed767
24L Take Off Shots At LAX posted Wed Aug 11 2010 17:59:34 by compussr
Rare Or Run Of The Mill? posted Sun Jan 24 2010 12:32:25 by McG1967
Pricing Help - Web-only Ad For Sale Of Plane posted Mon Jan 4 2010 10:09:52 by Vzlet