Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Nikon D600 Has Arrived  
User currently offlinechuck9941 From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 194 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 6906 times:

24mp full-frame, iso 100 - 6400, 5.5 fps, $2,099.95 body
Thoughts?
http://www.nikon.com/news/2012/0913_dslr_01.htm


Oh, it's a big pretty white plane with red stripes, curtains in the windows and wheels and it looks like a big Tylenol.
11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSilver1SWA From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 4772 posts, RR: 26
Reply 1, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 6862 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I find it interesting that Nikon and Canon, rumored to be coming out with something similar, are doing this. As I learned of the rumors, I kept asking what will be missing that justifies the affordable price? Something's gotta give, right? Apparently not. To me, this D600 looks like a better all-around camera than the D800 which seems to be strictly a landscape camera.


ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
User currently offlinetrvyyz From Canada, joined Oct 2004, 1369 posts, RR: 10
Reply 2, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 6851 times:

The body is simply a D7000 one and it is hopeless for a 2000 pus camera. The construction cannot be compared to a similar priced D700 or 5DMkII.
When the rumours started, it was supposed to be priced $1500 which could be reasonable. But why would you want to spend 2100 buck on am amateur body when you could get 5DMkII or D700 (if still around) for a similar or cheaper price.
I had my grip on D7000 squeak and flex when I hold and move, send it twice to Nikon sevice to finally fix it.
The front is a cheap plastic and very thin near the battery door and seems to be a common issue(unless the changed it on the d600).
IQ should be good based on the samples but still doesn't justify the price, the D300/s is a much better body.
The handling would not be good on the D600 and I am sure professionals/semi used to D700 or even D300(s) will not like it.
Appeals only to enthusiasts.

[Edited 2012-09-13 10:54:05]

User currently offlineckw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 730 posts, RR: 16
Reply 3, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 6764 times:

One thing I've seen reported missing is a flash sync cable connection and also a flash sync limited to 1/200th. No biggie for many, yet for studio photographers (serious full frame users) this is an important detail.

Also can't figure out the pricing - while Nikon perhaps caught Canon napping with the price of the D800 vs the 5D3, the D600 is not cheap at £2000 when you can get a D800 for £2100 or a 5D3 £2400 - both more capable cameras (on paper anyway). And there is the new Sony A99 at £2400 - which looks to be a very interesting camera.

Anyway, nothing new or exciting offered in the spec of the D600, though I would think it would make a decent all round general purpose camera. Just don't think it offers value for money. As far as I'm concerned, the worst bit about this is that it doen't put any pressure on Canon to produce a 'low cost' full frame body.

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlinetrvyyz From Canada, joined Oct 2004, 1369 posts, RR: 10
Reply 4, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 6752 times:

Quoting ckw (Reply 3):

Clearly Nikon is targeting someone who has never touched a semi-pro body.
But anyways i have a feeling that they will drop down the prices with sales etc. may be around December it could go for $1800 on sale.

The choices of D800 at one extreme and D600 at the other makes no sense, when all they needed was an updated D700 (21 MP) with movie mode added.


User currently offlineyerbol From Kazakhstan, joined Feb 2010, 219 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 6698 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Thanks to Nikon for full frame camera like D600. Would be interesting to see its ISO performance in low light. It is in my wish list  


With best regards from Almaty
User currently offlineclickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9607 posts, RR: 69
Reply 6, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 6681 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

The D600 is only £100 more than a D800? Even with toilet paper US Dollars (Thanks Banana Ben) that's only $160. In the states the price difference is $900.

User currently offlinegasman From New Zealand, joined Mar 2004, 862 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 6661 times:

Quoting Silver1SWA (Reply 1):
D800 which seems to be strictly a landscape camera.

Totally agree. Landscape and HD video. For just about every other purpose the 5DMkIII is a better bet.


User currently offlineckw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 730 posts, RR: 16
Reply 8, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 6648 times:

Quoting clickhappy (Reply 6):
The D600 is only £100 more than a D800? Even with toilet paper US Dollars (Thanks Banana Ben) that's only $160. In the states the price difference is $900.


Other way round! But that is based on a quick check of online prices, not retail. Of course as pre order the D600 is gonna be full price, while the D800 has already got to the discounted/special offers stage. I suspect the price difference is not so much that the D800 is cheap here, more like the D600 price has been inflated.

In fairness a $900 differential does make more sense - that seems a sensible differential.

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlinetrvyyz From Canada, joined Oct 2004, 1369 posts, RR: 10
Reply 9, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 6125 times:

I thin the European prices have been brought down where it should have been.
I don't know about D700, but the images I saw on dpreview of the D600, high ISO were unbelievable. How does the High iso of this one compare to D700? or even 5D MkIII


User currently offlinemegatop412 From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 309 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 5986 times:

If this camera had been in a semi-pro body like the D700's, it would have been the D700 successor everyone was wanting(called the D700X, D710, or whatever). Instead they put the D700's successor into what appears to be a D7000-like body.

Whatever. I shoot with a D90 so what do I know.


User currently offlinemaaximm From Russia, joined Mar 2009, 2 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 5333 times:

According to preliminary data, this model is the same problem with skin tone, blue and green channels, we can only hope that it's not so bad.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
The D60 Vs F707 Has Arrived posted Wed Jul 17 2002 09:21:45 by Planenut
Any Nikon D3100 Users In This Forum? posted Mon Jul 23 2012 23:37:18 by Aerosreenivas
Nikon 70-300 Vr Or Sigma 150-500 posted Mon Jul 23 2012 01:37:27 by turkishraf
Nikon L120 Question posted Wed Jul 18 2012 12:32:59 by PHX787
Nikon D800 And D7000 Dslr Battery Recall posted Wed Jul 11 2012 14:52:05 by Plainplane
First Accepted Shots With Nikon D800 posted Sat Jun 9 2012 00:16:24 by andyhunt
Just Purchased A Nikon D5000. Help! posted Fri Jun 8 2012 19:18:29 by PWMRamper
Nikon D90: Recommendation For Flash Diffuser posted Fri Jun 1 2012 19:12:52 by Loran
Cheap Nikon Tele Tens? posted Fri May 11 2012 14:22:00 by BRE16
Where Can I Buy A Nikon D800e In LAX, Help! posted Thu Apr 26 2012 12:46:32 by ghost77