Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Nikon 80-400mm  
User currently offlineAirMalta From Malta, joined Mar 2006, 394 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 4814 times:

Dear guys,
I am thinking in buying a Nikon lens 80-400mm I have heared rumours that the current lens has its AF slow comparing it with other lenses. Can you confirm yr opinion about it and also can you confirm that Nikon is going to issue an improved version of this lens after Christmas??
thanks

3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAirMalta From Malta, joined Mar 2006, 394 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 4814 times:

Forgot to add that this lens will be used with a Nikon D7000
thanks


User currently onlinescbriml From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2003, 12468 posts, RR: 46
Reply 2, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 4771 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The AF is slow compared with current Nikon AF lenses, especially the AF-S models.

If you're shooting airliners, then in nearly all circumstances, the slower AF isn't an issue. If you're trying to follow a displaying fighter at an air show, then it will struggle, even if you're in continuous focus mode.

It's a decent lens in good light but does struggle in sub-optimal light. I used one for several years and managed OK with it (I have plenty of shots here taken with it).

For what it provides, I think it's overpriced. I wouldn't go back to it, but that's because the two lenses I've replaced it with are so much better (probably the best two zoom lenses that Nikon make). But, I end up carting around two large, heavy lenses instead of one reasonably compact lens.

Will it be upgraded? Difficult to say, there have been rumours for a long time. It would be nice to have a decent Nikon equivalent to the ubiquitous Canon 100-400mm.

I still have mine, and it's in good condition. Email me through my profile if you might be interested in buying it.



Time flies like an arrow, but fruit flies like a banana!
User currently offlinemegatop412 From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 309 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 4599 times:

I was close to buying the 80-400 when I decided I would rather have the long end of the Sigma 150-500mmOS, which has HSM and apparently focuses faster than the AF-D module of the 80-400. Having shot several airshows this year with the Sigma, I am not dissatisfied with it. It is also cheaper than the Nikkor

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
My Thoughts On The Sigma 80-400mm OS Lens (Nikon). posted Tue Dec 13 2005 21:49:48 by Yanqui67
Nikon 80-200mm F2.8 AF-D Issues posted Tue Oct 30 2012 11:40:37 by trvyyz
Nikkor 80-400mm Focus Speed posted Mon Aug 29 2011 11:30:15 by ail5901
Nikon 80-200 F2.8 Or Sigma 50-500 posted Sat Dec 5 2009 07:58:35 by 744flyer
Using The Nikon 80-400VR With The D90 posted Sun Aug 2 2009 09:42:16 by Alasdair1982
Nikon 80-400 AF VR Versus Sigma 150-500 HSM OS posted Sun Jan 11 2009 12:22:30 by GimliGlider
Grain Problems With Nikkor 80-400mm posted Sun Oct 19 2008 12:42:25 by Packman
Nikon 80-400 Focusing Problem posted Wed Oct 3 2007 00:47:34 by Jakbar
Help Needed From Nikon 200-400mm Lense Users posted Sat May 26 2007 14:14:29 by Columbia107
Nikon 200-400mm F/4 VR - Anyone Have One? posted Thu Jul 27 2006 04:05:32 by Psyops