Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Super-zoom Bridge Camera Advice.  
User currently offlinebsu747 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2004, 173 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 7329 times:

Hi Guys
Wanted some opinions regarding bridge cameras with super-zoom, I already have a DSLR but as I do a lot of cycling & hill walking I wanted a super-zoom that is light & compact enough to fit in my backpack along with my other gear. I wanted a camera that would give me decent photo's of aircraft flying overhead both on approach to my local airport but also of aircraft that are contrailing much further above, I also have an interest in taking pictures of astronomy as well.
I have narrowed it down to a few cameras but have not ruled out others if they are recommended, they are
Canon SX50 50 x optical zoom
Nikon P510 42 x optical zoom
Panasonic FZ200 only 24 x zoom (but has a F2.8 lens)
Also has anybody had any experience using a teleconverter with any of these cameras, would it be a worthwhile addition?


Flying may not be all plain sailing, but the fun of it is worth the price.
8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinedazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2934 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (2 years 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 7273 times:

Quoting bsu747 (Thread starter):
I wanted a camera that would give me decent photo's of aircraft flying overhead both on approach to my local airport but also of aircraft that are contrailing much further above, I also have an interest in taking pictures of astronomy as well.

You'll probably struggle with a bridge camera if that's what you're intending on using it for. The focussing and shutter lag on all the bridge cameras I've used are too slow for this application. Image quality is also something to be desired at the longer end of the zoom ranges and noise is apparent in all but the brightest of days when you can use the lowest ISO. If you can accept those compromises, you'll be ok with most of the newer generation super-zooms but don't expect the results to be anything close to your DSLR. Bear in mind atmospheric conditions when using long zoom lenses will come in to play.

Quoting bsu747 (Thread starter):
Also has anybody had any experience using a teleconverter with any of these cameras, would it be a worthwhile addition?

Given the optics, I'd not even consider a teleconverter.

Darren



Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
User currently offlinebsu747 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2004, 173 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (2 years 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 7145 times:

Quoting dazbo5 (Reply 1):

Hi dazbo5
I have a DSLR but find that it is too big/heavy for my backpack that also has my walking/cycling gear, food etc.., just felt as the quality of the super zooms are getting better all the time that I would invest in one, I usually only go hiking in the good weather anyway so this should help when taking pictures. Also I would not want to risk breaking my DSLR should I fall or slip, the bridge compact would be better protected in the backpack being smaller & cheaper.  
Would I be able to hook a bridge camera up to a telescope like you can with a DSLR?



Flying may not be all plain sailing, but the fun of it is worth the price.
User currently offlineDL747 From United States of America, joined Nov 2012, 621 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (2 years 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 7138 times:

Not sure if you can use the telescope, but as Darren said, you will see pretty bad quality woth that much focal length on that teeny sensor.


Just like the shirt says, Boeing Builds It Better!
User currently offlinedazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2934 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (2 years 2 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 7123 times:

Quoting bsu747 (Reply 2):
Would I be able to hook a bridge camera up to a telescope like you can with a DSLR?

You'll have to do dome research to see if there is an available adapter for the camera model / telescope you're looking at, but don't expect much in the way of image quality without getting quality equipment (£££).

I can appreciate you wanting a more compact camera for your travels, but you mentioned 'decent photos' and you won't get that from a super-zoom if you need the longer end of the focal range. The one I have isn't too bad at the wider end of the lens, but way too soft towards the longer end and many are like that.

Darren



Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
User currently offlineckw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 769 posts, RR: 16
Reply 5, posted (2 years 2 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 7113 times:

If you're looking for something you can hook up to a telescope, consider the micro 4/3 range of cameras. These should meet your size requirement. There are a whole range of adaptors available which should allow you to attach the camera to pretty much any optic (lens or scope) ever made.

As a bonus, the better models are on a par with entry to mid range DSLRs for image quality - and there is an excellent range of lenses available.

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlinemjgbtv From United States of America, joined Jan 2008, 919 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (2 years 2 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 7068 times:

Quoting dazbo5 (Reply 4):
you mentioned 'decent photos' and you won't get that from a super-zoom if you need the longer end of the focal range.

I would say that depends on your point of reference. Maybe not 'decent' as in A.net quality aircraft shots, but my older super-zoom has taken shots that I consider very decent through the entire focal range. It might be worth noting that it is 'only' a 12x so the range is smaller, but it is also several years old so I would expect the overall quality to be lower than in current cameras.

As for micro 4/3, I have one and I love it, but for the sort of things the OP mentioned I tend to bring my super-zoom instead.

Marty


User currently offlinebsu747 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2004, 173 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (2 years 1 week 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 7003 times:

Whilst I know having a bridge camera might not give me top notch airliners.net photos, for my needs it should do the job, it is more essential that I reduce the size & weight that I can carry on my hikes, in an ideal world I would have a Sherpa along with me carrying a shed load of gear for me! Just torn on what bridge camera to get, the SX50 for its longer zoom or the FZ200 for its constant F2.8 lens.


Flying may not be all plain sailing, but the fun of it is worth the price.
User currently offlinejfpeng1998 From China, joined Oct 2010, 2 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (2 years 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 6555 times:

I own a Canon PowerShot SX30IS (now replaced by the SX40 and SX50), and at first I wished to use it for aviation photography. It won't really work out for takeoffs and landings, since a faster shutter speed needs a higher ISO. With the sensor of a SX30, there is grain from ISO 200 upwards. It would be great for taking shots of aircraft at gates or aircraft taxiing though.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Camera Advice For Newbie... posted Sat Jul 3 2010 22:35:23 by swadeep
A Good Compact Camera - Advice Please posted Tue Jul 21 2009 12:31:08 by Deaphen
New Camera Advice posted Tue Mar 4 2008 16:00:38 by YXD172
Camera Advice posted Mon Mar 3 2008 18:38:25 by Bok269
Camera Advice, Please posted Tue Jan 29 2008 11:26:18 by Jetfreak
Telephoto Lens And SLR Camera - Advice? posted Fri Nov 30 2007 19:22:34 by Jawed
New Camera [advice]. 10 Mega Pixels posted Sat Dec 30 2006 15:42:54 by TACAA320
Camera Advice Needed Please posted Sat Nov 18 2006 10:24:37 by Sabena 690
Camera Advice posted Sun Sep 24 2006 11:23:32 by Bruno
Need An Urgent Camera Advice posted Thu Mar 2 2006 12:29:44 by Glapira