Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Location: Withheld  
User currently offlineflyingturtle From Switzerland, joined Oct 2011, 2035 posts, RR: 13
Posted (1 year 3 months 1 week 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 3243 times:

Hello fellow a.nutters,


why are most of the Russian plane pictures made at the airbase called "Withheld"?

Anyway, what sensitive information can be gleaned from such pictures?


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Sergy




Why does the USAF not have such a problem with the pictures?



David


Keeping calm is terrorism against those who want to live in fear.
2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 31
Reply 1, posted (1 year 3 months 1 week 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 3012 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting flyingturtle (Thread starter):
why are most of the Russian plane pictures made at the airbase called "Withheld"?

It is not a single location, but can be used for any location deemed too sensitive to list specifically.

Quoting flyingturtle (Thread starter):
Why does the USAF not have such a problem with the pictures?

Unlike in western developed nations, things are a little more restrictive in some parts of the world, including Russia. The photographers face a lot less hassle by withholding the exact location and the specific date, so we give them special dispensation to do so. The simple fact is that without that exception, many would simply not upload their images.


User currently offlineBigJKU From United States of America, joined Feb 2007, 873 posts, RR: 11
Reply 2, posted (1 year 3 months 1 week 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 2763 times:

Honestly they are probably listed as location withheld because the laws in the USSR basically made most military locations "secret" back when that might have mattered. Then when orbital recon came into operation and all that crap became useless (at least for anything so blindingly obvious as an airbase) they never bothered to change it as that was part of the culture.

Now I suspect it simply endures because the current government is not inclined to change it and people have bigger problems. It does no one any good at all as everyone who needs to know or care where these things were at already knows. The Russians also know that they know. But the rule will stay in place from a combination of apathy and what amounts to tradition I would guess.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Location Field, why "withheld" for civillian commercial A/C? posted Sat Jan 7 2012 19:23:04 by andrew50
MIA Terminal Spotting/Photography Location Request posted Sun Oct 16 2011 19:35:46 by NPeterman
MIA Location: LH A380 posted Fri Jun 3 2011 23:55:56 by flymia
LAX Spotting In Early Jan .. Best Location? posted Tue Dec 28 2010 09:40:06 by xcoaster1
Location Help Sought (Hungary) posted Tue Nov 23 2010 00:10:55 by Domjan
Photo Location Issues posted Mon Oct 25 2010 10:00:06 by jspitfire
JNB Photo Location posted Thu Aug 19 2010 08:01:44 by mclaudio
Spotting Location At Ksmf? posted Thu Jan 21 2010 20:38:43 by Ksaini13
LAX Spotting Help - Location Identification posted Thu Jan 14 2010 18:22:29 by ThomasWarloe
Best Spotting Location (SYDNEY) posted Wed Dec 23 2009 18:25:53 by Weebie