Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Canon Eos7D RAW  
User currently offlinestef247 From Belgium, joined Dec 2005, 4 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 3552 times:

Hello,

Does somebody can tel me if this is a issue on the Canon 7D, if you photograph in RAW with a iso of 100 there is mutch noise on the picture.
Because I planning a new body to replace my 40D, but I'm not convinced this is the best option for me.
All helps are welcome  

thanks in advance.

Kind regards,

Stef

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineshufflemoomin From Denmark, joined Jun 2010, 478 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (1 year 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 3544 times:

I use a 7D and an original 5D. I notice no noise issues at ISO 100 on the 7D. I'm primarily a concert photographer and happily use the 7D at 3200 & 6400. Of course you'll get some noise at those ISOs, but it's nothing lightroom or Dx0 can't sort out. ISO 100 is totally fine. You'll find the 7D an excellent step up from the 40D. It's the best cropframe Canon currently offers, in my opinion.

User currently offlineckw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 732 posts, RR: 16
Reply 2, posted (1 year 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 3530 times:

I would say the 7D can be a bit noisy, even at 100 ISO - I found there was always some 'texture' in blue skies. Also it is very intolerant of the slightest underexposure - if you try and correct this in post, shadows get very noisy.

I found the key was to a) be very careful with exposure and b) apply a little luminance noise suppression in ACR when processing the RAWs.

Of course, the very large file also means that often you will be reducing the image in size for the final version which both reduces noise and improves sharpness.

But the 7D is a bit odd - while at 100 ISO it can't produce the silky images of an original 5D, once you go above 800 ISO it begins to show its worth. Obviously shots at 3200 & 6400 will show some noise, but until the 5D3 came along, it was probably your best bet for high ISO shooting.

You also have to look at the entire package. The AF is very good and the ergonomics were a real step forward for Canon. A real joy to use compared to the 40D or similar models.

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineSilver1SWA From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 4783 posts, RR: 26
Reply 3, posted (1 year 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 3476 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I agree with everything Colin said. The 7D, on the pixel peeping level will look noisy at low ISOs compared to the 40D but in the real world, it's not an issue as long as you get the exposure right. For airliners.net, you'll probably need to apply small amounts of noise reduction in LR or ACR to avoide a noise/grain rejection in the sky. My workflow involves moving the luminance slider to 15-20 as the first step for every shot taken at ISO 100-400.

If you primarily shoot aviation and don't get wildly creative with processing, the 7D is just fine. However if you also enjoy different types of photography that involve a more creative processing style like HDR or processing that involves popular filter sets from Nik software (for example), it won't take long before image quality begins to break down compared to files from some other cameras out there.



ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
User currently offlineconinpa From Luxembourg, joined May 2005, 244 posts, RR: 6
Reply 4, posted (1 year 7 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 3364 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

There is always noise in a RAW file, even at 100 ISO. It's the purpose of editing software to eliminate it properly. The built-in camera software does it for you if you shoot JPEG. I personally shoot in RAW and use Camera Raw (available in PS and Lightroom). The recent versions are really good at noise reduction without affecting too much the photo.


Patrick De Coninck
User currently offlineKFLLCFII From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 3301 posts, RR: 30
Reply 5, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 3339 times:

Keep in mind that the individual pixel size on the 7D is actually smaller than that found on the 40D, which is what allows it to have almost twice the amount of megapixels (18.0) than the 40D (10.1) for the same physical sensor size. In other words, the 7D has a greater "pixel density", but this comes as a consequence: Each pixel (since smaller) cannot "tolerate" the same amount of light as the 40D before filling up and losing color clarity...inducing noise faster. But the impressive high-ISO capability of the 7D only goes to show it has better internal noise-handling qualities at high ISO between the sensor and the memory card...Which is not to say the raw data sent from the sensor to the internal processor may not be as impressive as that of the 40D (only the folks at Canon would know), but of course, it's what is sent to the memory card that counts for us anyway.

Here's a good read on this topic: Pixels Are Like Cupcakes. Let Me Explain.



"About the only way to look at it, just a pity you are not POTUS KFLLCFII, seems as if we would all be better off."
User currently offlineckw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 732 posts, RR: 16
Reply 6, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3306 times:

I think Canon made a mistake with the 7D - if they'd made it, say 12mp or maybe even 15 it would have been a killer camera. Unfortunately by squeezing those extra pixels in they produced a good camera with an issue. But I guess for marketing purposes the numbers rule.

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlinebraby From UK - England, joined Mar 2007, 138 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 3300 times:

I have a 7D and a 50D, when shooting side by side and processing for here I find that the 7D requires a little noise reduction whereas the 50 doesn't require any. However as stated in previous post's it's easy to remove, I previously used Canon's own DPP and now use Lightroom and both of these are easy enough to set up noise reduction when importing your photo's.
I think the 7D is a great camera feels so much better in my hands than any previous canon camera I have owned I have been able to use it at it's highest iso setting to get some images that otherwise would have been lost to me granted they wouldn't get on here or be published but i shoot for myself first and foremost.


User currently offlineDubi From Slovenia, joined Mar 2006, 14 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 3216 times:

7D has noise issues. In dark areas. And if you clean noise with Photoshop etc., you must know HOW, WHERE and WHY. Best practice is to compensate for EV by +1/2 or +1 stop on the camera itself if background is the sky, before you take a photo. Then is much easier in Photoshop to compensate in minus.
BTW if at least half of scene in the viewfinder is the bright sky, and you have strong shadows then, you can always comfortably compensate for +1EV.

[Edited 2013-01-22 23:45:57]

[Edited 2013-01-22 23:55:52]

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Canon D60: RAW And Jpeg posted Wed Aug 28 2002 16:09:54 by RWY-16
Canon Raw Processing Using PS3 posted Sat Nov 22 2008 09:45:54 by Rtl
Photoshop W/RAW From (Nikon D80 || Canon EOS 400D) posted Tue Oct 3 2006 07:55:50 by Domokun
Canon RAW In Photoshop CS2 posted Tue Jan 17 2006 20:05:54 by Nirmalmakadia
Where Are My RAW Files On My Canon 20D? posted Tue Jul 5 2005 10:29:29 by Sfilipowicz
Editing Canon RAW (CR2) Format posted Thu Feb 3 2005 20:57:09 by Janne
Canon RAW Question posted Tue May 25 2004 23:19:20 by Bronko
Canon RAW (.crw) posted Sun Mar 14 2004 04:45:40 by United4everDEN
Raw Vs Jpeg - Canon D30 posted Fri May 16 2003 12:07:01 by FLYBHX
Canon 300 2.8 II Users posted Sun Jan 13 2013 08:15:51 by brno