Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Noise And Grain Reduction?  
User currently offlineBriceJohnson From Canada, joined Mar 2012, 111 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 5 months 2 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 3314 times:

Hey All.

I am currently using Photoshop cs5 and PSE 10 for sharpening, grain/noise reduction, contrast, etc.

I am not sure how to get the best out of the noise reduction in cs5 or Elements, as neither of them seem to work very well, or am I using them incorrectly?

Also, any suggestions from the pros with regard to what sharpening tool I should use? FYI: I am using a Nikon D3100. My pics are getting rejected with "grain" "quality" and "Soft" as the most common.

Thanks.


Calvin | image120
8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineckw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 730 posts, RR: 16
Reply 1, posted (1 year 5 months 2 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 3313 times:

Hard to comment without examples, but, given decent light, images should need very little processing. If you need to make lots of adjustments, it is perhaps more appropriate to consider how to improve the original image.

Post processing should not be seen as a fix, but rather a method of fine tuning an already decent image.

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineBriceJohnson From Canada, joined Mar 2012, 111 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (1 year 5 months 2 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 3312 times:

Thanks for the response Colin. What sort of camera do you use, and what are your processing techniques?


Calvin | image120
User currently onlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 9781 posts, RR: 26
Reply 3, posted (1 year 5 months 2 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 3289 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting ckw (Reply 1):
Post processing should not be seen as a fix, but rather a method of fine tuning an already decent image.

Yes and no. I've certainly taken many photos where I know that I'll need/want to do this or that in post-processing. Of course there's HDR and other composites, but also I'll take photos at ISO2000+ sometimes, and there's usually no way I'll get anything usable without some decent NR. Of course, I don't usually upload those photos to A.net....

It is perhaps just differing viewpoints on photography, as has been suggested many times. I certainly try to get my raw image as close as I can, but it's not always entirely possible.

Quoting BriceJohnson (Thread starter):
I am not sure how to get the best out of the noise reduction in cs5 or Elements, as neither of them seem to work very well, or am I using them incorrectly?

Hmmm, I find CS5 wonderful for noise reduction. However, note that I'm talking about NR on a RAW file. I find it quite good for that.



"Two and a Half Men" was filmed in front of a live ostrich.
User currently offlineckw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 730 posts, RR: 16
Reply 4, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 3239 times:

Quoting BriceJohnson (Reply 2):
What sort of camera do you use, and what are your processing techniques?

Sorry Brian, what you're asking would require an essay! I've owned/used most of Canon's DSLRs since the original D30, plus a few m4/3 models. Currently using a 5D3 and an OMD-5 (following the death by water of my 7D).

As to processing, again the devil's in the detail, and the key points will differ according to the lighting, ISO, lens used etc.

However I guess the rules start at the point of composition - I always shoot with my experience of what I can do in post-processing in mind. So for instance composition is based on how I may want to crop the image later, exposure based on the noise characteristics of the camera - eg. the 7D is very intolerent of underexposure, so my exposures were always on the generous side. The 5D lets you get away with murder.

I always shoot RAW. More time consuming I know, but gives a lot more flexibility. I use PS CS5 and ACR 6.7

1- Basic exposure adjustments, noise reduction (if needed) and cropping are all done in RAW. I may adjust the color balance or fine tune particular colours in RAW as well. If lens correction (esp. for WA) is needed, this is done in RAW.

2 - Import into PS as a 16bit image (at this point I'm using the ProPhoto color space to keep as much data as possible

3 - Adjust the tone curve. This varies from image to image, but as a general rule I tend to use a bit of an S curve (darken the shadows, brighten highlights) to give the image a little more punch - that's a matter of taste, but I do notice that the mags seem to like this, and will often add a bit more to my images. Note - its always possible for a publisher to add contrast, sharpness etc., but difficult to take it away!

4 - Sharpen. Now my personal view is that A.net images are oversharp, so perhaps not best to listen to me but I get the results I want using smart sharpen. Settings will vary depending on camera and lens, but my starting point is amount 100 radius 1.6

5 - and that's it. Save as sRGB jpg

Now I should stress I stopped shooting for A.net some time ago. The only acceptance criteria I worry about is whether the image is suitable for publication. I'm sure others will have cleverer, more sophisticated methods. Indeed, back in the days of film scanning I got very anal about this sort of thing - even wrote a suites of sharpening scripts for PS.

These days, I'm more of a keep it simple, less is more kinda guy. In part, this is because I'm often shooting to deadlines on assignment . This means getting as much right as possible in camera. I shoot a LOT of exposures, bracket exposures, vary the DOF etc. The idea is to get a frame that will take minimal work in post, as that's where the real time and effort comes in.

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineviv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 3142 posts, RR: 29
Reply 5, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 3224 times:

Quoting ckw (Reply 1):
iven decent light, images should need very little processing. If you need to make lots of adjustments, it is perhaps more appropriate to consider how to improve the original image.

Post processing should not be seen as a fix, but rather a method of fine tuning an already decent image.

Quite right.



Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
User currently offlinesovietjet From Bulgaria, joined Mar 2003, 2577 posts, RR: 17
Reply 6, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 3163 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Yes, but the light is not always decent. I think anyone can take a photo on a nice sunny day with the sun behind you and have no trouble editing with just a few minor adjustments and no need for noise reduction. I think what the OP might have in mind is those days or situations when the light is not ideal, the ISO is not low, the editing is more tricky, etc...and wants to know how to suppress the inevitable noise increase during these situations.

That being said, I use Neat Image. You can have it integrated into photoshop and it does everything pretty much automatically. All you have to do is tell it how aggressive to be in noise reduction as you don't want to "wash out" your photos.


User currently offlineBriceJohnson From Canada, joined Mar 2012, 111 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 3129 times:

Could someone tell me how to properly sharpen and do NR in cs5 or Elements?

Thanks.



Calvin | image120
User currently onlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 9781 posts, RR: 26
Reply 8, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 3109 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting sovietjet (Reply 6):
Yes, but the light is not always decent. I think anyone can take a photo on a nice sunny day with the sun behind you and have no trouble editing with just a few minor adjustments and no need for noise reduction. I think what the OP might have in mind is those days or situations when the light is not ideal, the ISO is not low, the editing is more tricky, etc...and wants to know how to suppress the inevitable noise increase during these situations.

  

Quoting BriceJohnson (Reply 7):
Could someone tell me how to properly sharpen and do NR in cs5 or Elements?

There's no "proper" way as such - everyone will have a different technique. We can only tell you what we do.

To start with, are you doing this on a RAW file or a JPEG?



"Two and a Half Men" was filmed in front of a live ostrich.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Noise And Color Issues With RAW, Advice Neeed. posted Thu May 21 2009 07:42:51 by RonS
Avoiding Softness And Grain posted Mon Dec 18 2006 11:51:29 by LIPH
About Grain/noise Reduction posted Thu Jul 15 2010 09:48:28 by MHO
Noise Reduction: Both Pre- And Post-scaling? posted Mon Aug 13 2007 19:54:46 by SNATH
Grain/noise Reduction Question.... posted Mon Jun 5 2006 22:45:55 by Sirpug
Advanced Noise Reduction And Sharpening posted Tue Oct 12 2004 03:43:55 by Futterman
Difference Between Grain And Noise? posted Fri Mar 26 2004 05:19:28 by MartinairYYZ
Grain And Sharpness: How Do You Tell? posted Fri Sep 30 2011 10:40:41 by Newark727
Grain And High ISO posted Sat Nov 20 2010 10:33:15 by jspitfire
Advice On Removing Noise/grain posted Sun Oct 26 2008 11:28:10 by Mke717spotter