Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Re-upload, Or Try New Photos?  
User currently offlineandspran From United States of America, joined Feb 2013, 56 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 3536 times:

I am a new member, just uploaded my two photos for review. I would be delighted if they were accepted, but am realistic enough to know that they will probably not be accepted first try. It's the waiting 11 days for only two pictures to be screened that is killing me. My question is, would it be better to try to fix the rejected photos? If they are re-uploaded, do those pictures get screened sooner? Or should I pick two more completely different photos to try again?
Andspran.

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 1, posted (1 year 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 3535 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting andspran (Thread starter):
My question is, would it be better to try to fix the rejected photos? If they are re-uploaded, do those pictures get screened sooner?

Not sure exactly what you are asking. If your images are rejected, they will need to be re-submitted to the queue, and again wait the ~10 days for screening. There is no way for them to be screened sooner. Any other comments about fixing the images would be conjecture without having seen the images in question. For that, there is the Feedback Forum where you can post your images for pre-screening.


User currently offlineandspran From United States of America, joined Feb 2013, 56 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (1 year 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 3478 times:

Quoting dlowwa (Reply 1):
Not sure exactly what you are asking

Sorry, I may not have asked the question the right way. I chose to upload two photos that probably aren't as good as others I have technically, but I didn't see very many photos of them in the database. (a 1947 Cessna 120, and an Aeronca in flight with snow skis attached.) The other planes I have photos of are more common and there seem to be plenty of photos of them in the database. So I thought the chances of acceptance might be better with the two not so common airplanes. Is that going to make any difference, or should I have simply gone with two photos that looked the best technically?
Andspran


User currently offlinedazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2903 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (1 year 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 3465 times:

Quoting andspran (Reply 2):
Is that going to make any difference, or should I have simply gone with two photos that looked the best technically?

Rare photos / aircraft and ones that have very few of in the database are likely to be treated as such and have slightly lower standards applied to them than common photos / aircraft. Why don't you do as Dana suggested and post the links on the feedback forum to give you feedback?

Darren



Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
User currently offlineKaphias From United States of America, joined Nov 2010, 301 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (1 year 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 3445 times:

Quoting andspran (Reply 2):
So I thought the chances of acceptance might be better with the two not so common airplanes. Is that going to make any difference, or should I have simply gone with two photos that looked the best technically?

As Darren said, I think it makes quite a big difference. Airliners.net is a database, and having every aircraft/registration/paint job/location would therefore be, I would think, the ultimate goal.



Flown on: C150, C172, C206, Beaver, Otter, Jetstream 32, Q400, CRJ7/9, E135/40/45, A320, B732/4/7/8/9, B744, B752, B763
User currently offlineNewark727 From United States of America, joined Dec 2009, 1340 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3435 times:

It's not exactly a perfect linear relationship though, new and unusual regs will still be rejected fairly often. If you're new, I would try the more commonplace photos if the ones you have now are rejected. However, if the rejection reason is for something fixable (color balance is often a simple adjustment for example) there's no reason not to make some changes then try again, apart from just the number of uploads you are allowed to have at once.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Re-Upload: To Do Or Not To? posted Thu Jan 31 2008 23:13:33 by MPDPilot
Double Upload Or Your Buddy Standing Next To You! posted Sat Dec 4 2010 05:00:06 by Jid
How Do I Re-upload Afer Rejection And Re-edit posted Sun Aug 8 2010 14:03:53 by photopilot
Problem With Re-upload Images. posted Sat Sep 26 2009 07:50:12 by Flight
Photo Re-upload Option posted Wed Jun 17 2009 10:01:08 by Apache
Somethings Wrong With The New Photos Added Today. posted Tue May 19 2009 21:00:52 by Flight
Re-upload Reject posted Mon Dec 22 2008 09:02:39 by Skidmarks
Need Help With Re Upload Page posted Tue Jan 8 2008 20:43:01 by Abrevdo
Photo Re-Upload Messed Up posted Mon Dec 24 2007 07:26:27 by DLX737200
Photo Re-upload Option - Is It Working? posted Thu Dec 13 2007 02:09:27 by UA935