Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Nikon D7000?  
User currently offlineBriceJohnson From Canada, joined Mar 2012, 126 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 5100 times:

Hey All,

I am thinking of upgrading from my current camera, (a Nikon D3100) to a D7000.

How many of you have experience on a D7000? Should I get a D7100?

Is it worth the upgrade?

Thanks,

Calvin
www.image120.com


Calvin | image120
10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineiamlucky13 From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 245 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 5096 times:

It is most definitely a worthy upgrade, if you need an upgrade. I have been extremely happy with mine in the 6 months I've had it.

Honestly, while it didn't get much respect because it's an entry level camera, it's still quite good if you know how to use it to the best of its capabilities, where as if you haven't learned how to get the most out of it, I'm not sure you'll get much as much out of upgrading to the D7000 as you might hope.

Are there specific things you find limit you about your D3100?


User currently offlinedarreno1 From United States of America, joined Jun 2010, 224 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 5078 times:

If you're going for the D7000, consider the D7100 if you have the extra cash. The improved sensor and focusing system alone is worth it IMO. You can't go wrong with either though. I won't be giving up my D7000 anytime soon.

I had a D3100 and loved it but it was limiting in terms of lens selection which was one of the reasons I upgraded. I can now autofocus and meter non-AF-S lenses. The other main reason for upgrading was the extra dedicated buttons and dials which really speed things up when changing the various functions.

With all that said, if you're not going to utilize the extras the D7000 series offer, there's little reason to upgrade as the D3100's image quality is quite good.



Nikon D7000 / Nikkor 105mm AF f2.8 / Nikkor 35 f1.8G / Nikkor 50 f1.8D / Nikkor 85mm / Nikkor 300mm f4 AF
User currently offlineBriceJohnson From Canada, joined Mar 2012, 126 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 5018 times:

Thanks for the responses guys.

Quoting iamlucky13 (Reply 1):
Are there specific things you find limit you about your D3100?



I find that the image quality is very limiting; ie: not great with regards to grain performance (I have to use noise reduction for almost every shot that I take). On top of this, this sensor does not have very many pixels, etc. Also, the frames per second is pretty limiting ( only 3). The battery on the d3100 is pathetic... I think that the battery on the D7000/71000 is way better. Finally, the features are exhaustible; it did not take me very long to understand/optimize everything on the camera.

To sum it all up, I am looking for a great Nikon DSLR, that would be an upgrade from what I already have (considering that I have limited funds for a new camera). I have owned the D3100 for 2 years... so I think that it's time for an upgrade  

More comments are appreciated!

Thanks,

Calvin



Calvin | image120
User currently offlineTristarAtLCA From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2007, 638 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 4962 times:

Hi Calvin,

I have happily owned a D7000 for about 2 years. It's a very capable camera with an impressive spec for its price and I have no doubt you will be very happy with it. Just some observations for you to consider:

The EN-EL15 battery is very good (the D800 uses it). I took over 900 images at RIAT last year and still had two bars left.

I dont know how big your hands are, but I found the body just too small so I had to purchase the MB-D11 grip to have somewhere to rest my little finger.

The buffer is fairly limited and will top out at between 8-11 RAW images at 6 fps. It's never been an issue to me in the real world and I go to a lot of airshow and motor racing events.

Their was some concern about the D7000 returning soft images (seriously, google it and you will find a lot of forums) with this being due to sensor issues/defects. My D7K did return soft images until I calibrated the AF fine tuning. Took less than 30 minutes for my all my lenses and my camera bangs out pin sharp images time after time.

Needless to say, the D7K performs best with better glass but then again what doesn't!

I like the look of the D7100 and have read many positive reviews, but am not sure if I would gain a huge amount by upgrading now.

If you have any other queries, PM or ask here anytime.

Rgds

Mark



If you was right..................I'd agree with you
User currently offlineBriceJohnson From Canada, joined Mar 2012, 126 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 4927 times:

Thanks for the advice Mark. But, I think that I will go for the D7100, as it is the latest model.... and I think that I will have it for a fairly long period of time. I really like the fact that it has a huge amount of pixels, and a 1.3x crop factor.  

I would appreciate some more comments from anyone who has had experience with the D7000 or D7100.

Is the D7100 worth the extra money?

Best,

Calvin



Calvin | image120
User currently offlineKLAXairport From United States of America, joined Nov 2011, 154 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 4917 times:

What setting is the D7000 best used on for spotting? The help is very well appreciated.

Cheers,
KLAXAirport   


User currently offlinedarreno1 From United States of America, joined Jun 2010, 224 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 4857 times:

Quoting KLAXairport (Reply 6):
What setting is the D7000 best used on for spotting? The help is very well appreciated.

There really is no 'one' setting. It depends on the subject, the equipment (lens) and the environment. On sunny days, I tend to stay somewhere around F10 aperture with the shutter at 1/1000 (ISO 200) in manual mode. But that could change as the light changes. Late in the day, I tend to up the ISO to 400 with the same shutter, or drop the shutter a little if I the ISO is kept the same. For me, it mostly depends on what the histogram is saying.

I'm not as worried underexposing as overexposing and blowing the highlights. As I shoot raw only, all it takes is a little Camera Raw or Photoshop magic to fix a dark pic. Overexposed shots, on the other hand, are much more of a challenge, sometimes impossible to recover.

If I'm using Aperture Priority, on bright days I tend to use between 0.7 -1.0 negative compensation with an aperture ranging from f8-f11 (ISO 200). Again, it mostly depends on the histogram, but also, on what shutter speed range I'm looking for.

[Edited 2013-05-07 20:00:36]


Nikon D7000 / Nikkor 105mm AF f2.8 / Nikkor 35 f1.8G / Nikkor 50 f1.8D / Nikkor 85mm / Nikkor 300mm f4 AF
User currently offlineKLAXAirport From United States of America, joined Nov 2011, 154 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 4851 times:

Quoting darreno1 (Reply 7):
There really is no 'one' setting. It depends on the subject, the equipment (lens) and the environment. On sunny days, I tend to stay somewhere around F10 aperture with the shutter at 1/1000 (ISO 200) in manual mode. But that could change as the light changes. Late in the day, I tend to up the ISO to 400 with the same shutter, or drop the shutter a little if I the ISO is kept the same. For me, it mostly depends on what the histogram is saying.

I'm not as worried underexposing as overexposing and blowing the highlights. As I shoot raw only, all it takes is a little Camera Raw or Photoshop magic to fix a dark pic. Overexposed shots, on the other hand, are much more of a challenge, sometimes impossible to recover.

If I'm using Aperture Priority, on bright days I tend to use between 0.7 -1.0 negative compensation with an aperture ranging from f8-f11 (ISO 200). Again, it mostly depends on the histogram, but also, on what shutter speed range I'm looking for.

Thanks a lot for the great help! I'll try and use it on my next spotting adventure.

Cheers,
KLAXAirport   


User currently offlineiamlucky13 From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 245 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 4806 times:

Quoting TristarAtLCA (Reply 4):
I dont know how big your hands are, but I found the body just too small so I had to purchase the MB-D11 grip to have somewhere to rest my little finger.

I noticed the same, but it's not actually too small. My D40 has a smaller grip, but is more comfortable to me.

The issue for me is the D7000 grip, and my hand size, leaves my pinky half on, half off the grip, which can cause minor cramping after shooting for a while.

With the D40, my pinky is fully off the grip and can curl underneath the camera in a relaxed position.

It's far from enough to make me unsatisfied with my purchase, however.

Quoting BriceJohnson (Reply 5):
I would appreciate some more comments from anyone who has had experience with the D7000 or D7100.

Is the D7100 worth the extra money?

It's not worth it for those who already have the D7000, but since you don't, unless the price difference is an issue for you, I would say go for it. The D7100 can autofocus in lower light, or with certain lens+teleconverter combos that the D7000 can not. A few other little bonuses - slightly higher resolution screen, more AF-points, and 60 fps video mode with a stereo mic.

I honestly don't care about the extra pixels. I don't need to print 5' across, and within my budget, my limit is my lenses, not the number of pixels I have.


User currently offlineBriceJohnson From Canada, joined Mar 2012, 126 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 4804 times:

Quoting iamlucky13 (Reply 9):
It's not worth it for those who already have the D7000, but since you don't, unless the price difference is an issue for you, I would say go for it. The D7100 can autofocus in lower light, or with certain lens+teleconverter combos that the D7000 can not.

Okay, thanks for advice. Considering that, I think that I will continue to save for the D7100.

All best, and happy shooting,

Calvin



Calvin | image120
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Nikon D7000 Settings posted Thu Apr 12 2012 14:51:02 by richstuart
Nikon D7000 Sigma 150-500 Or Canon 50D W 100 400 posted Wed Dec 7 2011 01:14:19 by antoinepsaila
Nikon D7000 Or EOS 60D posted Fri Oct 21 2011 15:37:57 by richstuart
Nikon D7000 First Pics posted Sat Nov 6 2010 12:55:53 by bistro1200
Nikon D5200 Or D7000 posted Sun Dec 16 2012 11:07:26 by Tomskii
Nikon D800 And D7000 Dslr Battery Recall posted Wed Jul 11 2012 14:52:05 by Plainplane
Nikon D3200 / 55-300 Nikkor DX VR - Help. posted Sun Apr 28 2013 17:51:34 by planotxwx
Nikon 70-200 F2.8 W/ 2TC Or 80-400VRII? posted Thu Apr 25 2013 06:29:45 by yowgangsta
Canon Vs Nikon, Low-light Performance posted Wed Apr 17 2013 08:51:09 by YXD172
Nikon New 80 400 VR AF-S posted Sat Apr 13 2013 11:52:44 by antoinepsaila