Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Aircraft Spotting - 100-400mm L Vs 70-300mm L  
User currently offlinefedeleal From Uruguay, joined Apr 2009, 8 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 7 months 2 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 5791 times:

Good morning guys!

I am about to jump in and become a commercial airline spotter in the near future.

Quick question... I currently have a Canon 7D and about to buy a photo lens. Would you recommend EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM lens rather than EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM? I can imagine the more zoom, the better, but wondering if at 400mm, that lens would still produce sharp imagery vs a moderated 300 mm.

Have you had the chance to test both on the field?

For a person like me acquiring his first photo lens,
would you have any suggestion on which one to buy first?

Thanks so much!

Fred

13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineoly720man From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 6848 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (1 year 7 months 2 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 5778 times:

I've got the 70-300L and this photo was taken with it


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Andy kennaugh



Can't comment on the 100-400.

It is really going to depend on what you're going to take photos of and will the 70-100 range be more useful than the 300-400mm range.

Other users elsewhere suggest the 70-300L is better than the 100-400L, e.g.

http://www.talkphotography.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=412730



wheat and dairy can screw up your brain
User currently offlinemoose135 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 2406 posts, RR: 10
Reply 2, posted (1 year 7 months 2 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 5774 times:

I've been using the 100-400L for close to 8 years, and recently moved to the 7D. I'm happy with the lens itself and the combination with the 7D. Since I shoot at airshows in addition to airliners at the airport, the extra reach is useful to me.


KC-135 - Passing gas and taking names!
User currently offlineNSMike From Canada, joined Mar 2005, 256 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (1 year 7 months 2 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 5739 times:

I have both... the 70-300L is sharper, however the extra reach of the 100-400L is useful sometimes. Depends on what focal length you need to shoot at most. I use the 7-300L most of the time now.


Pearl Snares, Taye Drums, Sabian Cymbals, Remo Heads, Los Cabos Sticks
User currently offlinefedeleal From Uruguay, joined Apr 2009, 8 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (1 year 7 months 2 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 5719 times:

Thank you so much guys!

BTW, Does anybody know aprox how many linear meters/ft does each lens zoom in at its max?

Have a great afternoon.

Fred


User currently offlineoly720man From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 6848 posts, RR: 11
Reply 5, posted (1 year 7 months 2 weeks ago) and read 5695 times:

Quoting fedeleal (Reply 4):
linear meters/ft does each lens zoom in at its max?

What you are asking has no answer. When at any focal length the lens has a field of view so what can be seen in the field of view depends on how far away it is - a C172 closer will fill the viewfinder like an A380 much further away.

A better way of looking at it is how far away will the [pick a plane] be to fill the viewfinder/image at 300mm and 400mm - not forgetting the 7D is an APS-C camera so there's a 1.6x crop factor which means you're looking at 480mm and 640mm in 35mm terms

At 300mm (=480mm) the horizontal angle of view is 4.29deg
At 400mm it's 3.22deg

An A320 (length = 38m) would be 500m away to fill the viewfinder at 300mm and 675m away with the 400m lens.

An f18 is 17m long, just less than half the A320, so the corresponding distances would be 250mm and 340m or thereabouts.

A lion is 2m long so the respective distances would be 30m and 40m.



wheat and dairy can screw up your brain
User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 5643 times:

Quoting oly720man (Reply 5):
A lion is 2m long so the respective distances would be 30m and 40m

Never actually been fortunate enough to see one of those taxiing at MAN but I hope to catch one some day.....  Wow!

KLarl


User currently offlinedazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2934 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 5624 times:

Quoting JakTrax (Reply 6):
I hope to catch one some day.....

I've had one just off the air strip in tsavo west, Kenya. Luckily, I needed 500mm and not 50mm as he was looking for lunch!



Quoting oly720man (Reply 1):
It is really going to depend on what you're going to take photos of and will the 70-100 range be more useful than the 300-400mm

For me, that's the biggest consideration. I considered a 100-400 when I was looking for a zoom lens but 100mm is too long at the short end for my needs. I think you need to consider what it is you need and whether the 70mm end will give you more of a benefit than 400mm.

Darren



Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 8, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 5617 times:

I have the 70-200 f/4 and the 100-400. I don't use them concurrently - the 70-200 tends to be my 'summer' lens and the 100-400 my 'winter lens'. 100mm is sometimes a bit close but I have a 24-105 to combat that problem.

Karl


User currently offlinearndt262 From Germany, joined Mar 2010, 89 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 5450 times:

Fred!

The EF 70-300 L lens has the better reliability when it comes to autofocus (reliability of 98%). I know that the EF 100-400 L has some problems with that... (reliability of about 87% at autofocus, pretty poor for the price)
So the EF 70-300 L should be the lense of your choice.

Arndt


User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 10, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 5437 times:

Quoting arndt262 (Reply 9):
So the EF 70-300 L should be the lense of your choice

Well.....

If you frequently shoot at 350-400mm then it's not the lens of choice. No amount of AF reliability will get you the shot; I'd sooner take the 87%!

 

To be honest I've never really had issues with the 100-400's AF wandering - in my experience it's no worse than any other L lens I've used.

Karl


User currently offlinefedeleal From Uruguay, joined Apr 2009, 8 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 12 hours ago) and read 5266 times:

Thank you all for such enriching recommendations! I truly appreciate them!

I finally bought the EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM. Should get it in about 10 days.

Can't wait to get it and start taking some great shots!

Best.

Fred


User currently offlineoly720man From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 6848 posts, RR: 11
Reply 12, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 11 hours ago) and read 5262 times:

Quoting fedeleal (Reply 11):
Can't wait to get it and start taking some great shots!

You won't be disappointed, I'm sure, and it's great for other things besides aircraft as well(!) which is what mine spends most of its time doing.



wheat and dairy can screw up your brain
User currently offlineChukcha From Australia, joined Mar 2006, 1991 posts, RR: 7
Reply 13, posted (1 year 7 months 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 5128 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I wasn't particularly happy with the EF 100-400L. Before I bought it, I had used the EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM. In the 100-400 I really missed the 70 end, and anything above 300 was too soft anyway.

Finally bit the bullet and replaced it with the EF 70-300L. We'll see...


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Canon EF 75-300mm F/4-5.6 III Vs. Sigma 70-300mm F posted Wed Mar 16 2005 05:16:57 by SkyWestFan
Improvement Between 70-300 And 100-400mm posted Fri Dec 17 2004 19:25:21 by Draigonair
Canon 100-400 Is Vs. 70-200 Is + 2x Conv. posted Wed Aug 11 2004 18:52:38 by Canberra
Canon EF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Is USM Lens On Canon EOS posted Wed Jan 9 2013 02:04:07 by ypphluke
Update To My 'Another 'Canon 100-400mm Problem'' posted Fri Aug 3 2012 08:15:24 by KelvinCJ
Another 'Canon 100-400mm L Problem' posted Fri Jun 15 2012 05:22:15 by KelvinCJ
Nikkor 70-300mm Or Tamron? posted Fri Feb 10 2012 09:27:16 by Tomskii
Aircraft Spotting In Jakarta posted Fri Dec 16 2011 02:21:41 by egondo
Canon 100-400mm Mk II? posted Tue Sep 20 2011 05:10:50 by NZ107
Canon EF 70-300mm F/4-5,6L Is USM - Happy With It? posted Wed Jun 8 2011 13:55:41 by Jetcrazy