Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
New Canon 100-400  
User currently offlineckw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 730 posts, RR: 16
Posted (1 year 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 4222 times:

What many of us are waiting for ...

Canon Rumours is reporting that the replacement 100-400 is being tested 'in the wild' with a possible announcement toward the end of the year. Most obvious difference is that twist ring replaces push pull, but I think we can assume the latest IS system will be incorporated. Those 2 features alone would make it of interest, but one would hope/assume improved optics as well.

Sadly it appears to still be a variable aperture f4-5.6, but to be honest, with improving ISO performance, slow lenses don't bother me too much.

Price estimated at us$2.5K + ... a lot of money, but at least more realistic than the 12K for the 200-400

Cheers,

Colin


Colin K. Work, Pixstel
3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineNZ107 From New Zealand, joined Jul 2005, 6394 posts, RR: 39
Reply 1, posted (1 year 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 4214 times:

Quoting ckw (Thread starter):

Yeah, that aperture staying as it is seems to tempt me even more towards the 70-200 2.8 II.. But I'm in no position right now to buy new lenses! I'd still rather shoot at 2.8 and a lower ISO than at f/5.6 and ISO10,000+.



It's all about the destination AND the journey.
User currently offlineangad84 From India, joined Nov 2012, 729 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (1 year 3 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 3990 times:

As long as it's as sharp or sharper than the 400mm f/5.6 wide open, I'll be in line as soon as it hits retail.

I can live with the slow aperture(s) and don't really care about IS, so all Canon needs to do is have snappy AF and much sharper images at the long end, and they can have my $2500.


User currently offlineCX Flyboy From Hong Kong, joined Dec 1999, 6573 posts, RR: 55
Reply 3, posted (1 year 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 3754 times:

Sounds good to me too. My 100-400 is 10-11 years old and pretty knackered. Been thinking about a replacement for the last couple of years and glad I didn't do it. Now I can wait for the MkII. The price sounds reasonable.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Rumor: Canon 100-400 Will Be Replaced Next Year posted Fri Oct 29 2010 09:27:38 by SNATH
Canon 100-400 L Is USM Lens posted Wed Jul 22 2009 04:01:06 by Snecma
Canon 100-400 Fell Off In Quality After 2 Years posted Tue Jan 6 2009 10:40:07 by Whisperjet
Rumor: Canon 100-400 L MkII Specs posted Mon Dec 29 2008 05:46:19 by SNATH
Any Rumors On A Canon 100-400 L Replacement? posted Fri Nov 28 2008 03:05:40 by SNATH
Canon 100-400 Lens Questions. posted Sun Oct 19 2008 12:37:22 by Apollo13
Have You Had This Problem With Canon 100-400 posted Tue Jan 8 2008 08:20:27 by Mirrodie
Canon 100-400 L Is? posted Fri Jun 22 2007 00:20:08 by Wolverine
Canon 100-400 Seizing Up. posted Mon Jul 31 2006 09:54:09 by Spencer
Canon 100-400 Or 300 L Or 400 L? posted Sat May 13 2006 00:37:44 by LHRSIMON