Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Canon 70D  
User currently offlineckw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 730 posts, RR: 16
Posted (1 year 4 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 5705 times:

This is the spec for the Canon 70D according to Canon rumours. Expect an announcment next week. Note that this one will have both a new sensor and new AF system

20.2mp CMOS Sensor
DIGIC 5+
19pt AF System (All Cross Type)
7fps
Built-in WiFi
3″ Vari-Angle Touch Screen LCD
ISO 12,800 Maximum
Dual Pixel CMOS Autofocus
Full HD Video
HDR
Multiexposure Mode
LP-E6 Battery
Announcement on July 2, 2013

Cheers,

Colin


Colin K. Work, Pixstel
58 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineangad84 From India, joined Nov 2012, 747 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 4 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 5693 times:

If that AF system is solid, I will stop waiting for the 7D Mk2. I hate being a guinea pig for new tech, though :p

Any word on AF microadjustment?

Cheers


User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 2, posted (1 year 4 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 5654 times:

Hopefully they'll re-introduce magnesium alloy bodies in the XXD range with this latest model. The plastic body of the 60D was the first thing that put me right off!

Karl


User currently onlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 9776 posts, RR: 27
Reply 3, posted (1 year 4 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 5645 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting ckw (Thread starter):
ISO 12,800 Maximum

Surprised they haven't increased that at all. The 50D has 12800 max too.

Quoting angad84 (Reply 1):
Any word on AF microadjustment?

Yup, wouldn't even consider it without that.



"Two and a Half Men" was filmed in front of a live ostrich.
User currently offlinesouthwest9 From United States of America, joined Nov 2012, 63 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (1 year 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 5609 times:

Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 3):
Surprised they haven't increased that at all. The 50D has 12800 max too.

True, but would you really ever want to shoot with your iso at 12800? I hope that they work on the noise control so that 12800 becomes more usable and not just some sort of last resort.


User currently onlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 9776 posts, RR: 27
Reply 5, posted (1 year 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 5583 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting southwest9 (Reply 4):
True, but would you really ever want to shoot with your iso at 12800?

Yes. Orion Nebula shot at ISO 12800:



With a new sensor with presumably better noise control, it seems logical that they'd extend the ISO range.



"Two and a Half Men" was filmed in front of a live ostrich.
User currently offlineNewark727 From United States of America, joined Dec 2009, 1335 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 4 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 5561 times:

What would the WiFi be for? Is that something cameras have been doing a lot recently? I'm kind of out of the loop, as I haven't needed a new body since getting a 50D at the end of 2009.

User currently offlineckw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 730 posts, RR: 16
Reply 7, posted (1 year 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 5546 times:

Quoting Newark727 (Reply 6):

What would the WiFi be for? Is that something cameras have been doing a lot recently?

Not something I would want as I don't like the idea of sending/posting unedited files anywhere, but for some this is a real big deal - upload files to Flickr or Facebook as you shoot. For photojournalists (though they probably won't be buying 70Ds) this is a very valuable feature. Expect it to be standard in all new models.

Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 3):
Surprised they haven't increased that at all. The 50D has 12800 max too.

I wonder if this a deliberate "crippling" of the camera - ie. the sensor may be capable of better, but they're not going to allow you to exceed 12800 in order to allow some differentiation with more expensive models

Quoting angad84 (Reply 1):
Any word on AF microadjustment?

No, and again this may be a deliberate omission to help ensure sales of the 7D mk II.

I would guess that the 70D will be as per the Canon Rumours spec, and the 7D mk II will possible use a similar sensor but with an AF more like the 5D3, dual processors (dedicated AF processor) magnesium body and microadjustment.

The big mystery for me is the new AF system - supposedly much faster in live view, but unclear whether it will support continuous focus ... if it does, that would be a big deal for anyone shooting video.


Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineNewark727 From United States of America, joined Dec 2009, 1335 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 4 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 5520 times:

Quoting ckw (Reply 7):
Not something I would want as I don't like the idea of sending/posting unedited files anywhere, but for some this is a real big deal - upload files to Flickr or Facebook as you shoot. For photojournalists (though they probably won't be buying 70Ds) this is a very valuable feature. Expect it to be standard in all new models.

That makes sense, though I was thinking something along the lines of a replacement for having a memory card reader attached to my laptop.


User currently offlineangad84 From India, joined Nov 2012, 747 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (1 year 4 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 5510 times:

Quoting JakTrax (Reply 2):
Hopefully they'll re-introduce magnesium alloy bodies in the XXD range with this latest model. The plastic body of the 60D was the first thing that put me right off!

Yep, that and the lousy weathersealing. Unfortunately, regardless of the material, it appears that the weathersealing will not improve where it matters most, thanks to the articulating screen. Again, Canon seems to focusing too much on the video-shooting crowd.

btw, happy A.net birthday!

Quoting ckw (Reply 7):
I wonder if this a deliberate "crippling" of the camera - ie. the sensor may be capable of better, but they're not going to allow you to exceed 12800 in order to allow some differentiation with more expensive models

I wouldn't be surprised.


User currently offlinedazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2885 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (1 year 4 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 5500 times:

Quoting Newark727 (Reply 6):
What would the WiFi be for?

For wireless transfer to a storage device, for example a laptop. Rather than thinking WiFi for internat connection, it can be used simply to transfer photos from the camera to a laptop, iPad etc as they're taken or once returned from a shoot. It just negates the need for wires or memory card readers. A feature many won't use or find useful, but some will. I'm in the process of toying ith the idea of replacing one of the memory cards in my video system with an eye-fi card for the same reason.

Darren



Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
User currently offlinePMN From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 563 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (1 year 3 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 5435 times:

I'm disappointed to see they've piled even more megapixels onto an APS-C sensor. No doubt the processing will be better than the 7D and noise performance will be improved (not that I ever found the 7D terribly noisy in normal use anyway) but such a densely packed sensor really puts serious demands on lenses in terms of sharpness. With such a sensible pixel count on the 1DX and the 5D3 remaining similar to the 5D2 I hoped Canon had started seeing sense and stopped joining in the nonsense pixel race but perhaps not. Or perhaps they've kept the top end sensible because pro/sensible amateur shooters generally know exactly what they need, and as the 70D is part of a lower range perhaps they're thinking people might just be taken in by more pixels?


Edith in his bed, a plane in the rain is humming, the wires in the walls are humming some song - some mysterious song
User currently offlineckw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 730 posts, RR: 16
Reply 12, posted (1 year 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 5379 times:

Quoting PMN (Reply 11):
I'm disappointed to see they've piled even more megapixels onto an APS-C sensor.

Agreed - even if Canon have sprinkled magic fairey dust on the sensor, an equivalent 12-15 mp sensor would be of higher quality. And the situation is aggravated by the fact that people buying a x0 series are probably less likely to buy a high quality lens than someone who an x series.

Sad fact is that at the consumer/pro-sumer level, pixel count still carries a lot of weight. And of course the various photomags are also at fault by the way they do comparisons, and not making clear the pros and cons of pixel count.

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineDazed767 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 5489 posts, RR: 51
Reply 13, posted (1 year 3 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 5353 times:

For me 20MP is overkill, still love my 10MP 40D and can shoot all day and then some in RAW with an 8GB card  

User currently offlineckw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 730 posts, RR: 16
Reply 14, posted (1 year 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 5270 times:

Well it's officially announced.

The headline news is of course all live view/video related, with the new AF system which allows for continuous focus when shooting video. That will be a huge feature for many, possibly as significant as putting video in the 5D2.

Personally I don't shoot video by choice, however, professionally I'm being asked to do so more and more often - this camera promises to make that a LOT easier, so I'll be looking at this one very closely.

On the still camera side not so much to offer that's new - though it uses the same AF and metering as the 7D and is nearly as fast. It does have micro-adjust as well. What it does have over the 7D is an articulated rear screen. I think this is quite important - something I use a lot with my OM-D. One of those things you don't fully appreciate until you use it.

Image quality - we'll have to wait and see. But if it is as good as the 7D (and yes, the 7D should be better!)I think I' could live with that and buy it as a 2nd body and video camera as it appears to add some useful capability lacking in my 5D3.

Price is pretty good - just over under $1200/ £1100. Anyone still interested in the 7D should probably wait a bit as this is sure to cause the price of that model to drop.

Cheers.



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineangad84 From India, joined Nov 2012, 747 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (1 year 3 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 5251 times:

I think apart from weather-sealing (thanks to the articulated screen) this camera is the true 50D replacement that many had hoped for back when the disappointing 60D was foisted on us.

I will miss the quick-control joystick from the 50D, but I think it's upgrade time for me.

Cheers


User currently offlineckw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 730 posts, RR: 16
Reply 16, posted (1 year 3 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 5237 times:

I think people get overly concerned about weather sealing ...

1 - weather sealed cameras are not RELIABLY weather sealed - sure, they offer some protection, but I would never assume that the camera is certain to survive a rain storm etc. I have personally seen many pro Canon cameras die in situation where you might have thought the wetaher sealing should have protected them.

2 - non weather sealed cameras don't generally melt at the first drop of rain - my orginal 5D (which is certainly not weather sealed) survived 5 years of sailing photography ... salt spray, rain, being knocked about in the bottom of boats - and, quite remarkably - sitting in an inch of salt water for over an hour. Of course ...

3 - ... if you really want to shoot in harsh conditions, then you really should invest in additional protection. I use Stormforce covers - simple, quick to put on, and can be stuffed in a pocket if not needed. Yes they are probably over priced for what they are (£30 - £50), but they work on any spec camera and are a lot cheaper than the premium you'd pay for a weather sealed body.

BTW - the articulated screen does not preclude weather sealing - Olympus had weather sealed articulated screens from day one.

Another thought ... you could think of the inclusion of WiFi as a form of weather sealing ... no need to open up the camera or remove the cover to change cards!

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineTonyholt777 From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2010, 185 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (1 year 3 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 5237 times:

Quoting ckw (Reply 14):
Anyone still interested in the 7D should probably wait a bit as this is sure to cause the price of that model to drop

Agree and its still a good option - I do wonder where Canon are going to pitch (any) upgrade/replacement of it tho given the specs below.

http://cpn.canon-europe.com/content/...es_with_brand_new_af_technology.do

Quoting PMN (Reply 11):
I'm disappointed to see they've piled even more megapixels onto an APS-C sensor

Me too - Gonna have to see some real world examples of this sensor myself before taking a dip.

T


User currently offlineckw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 730 posts, RR: 16
Reply 18, posted (1 year 3 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 5226 times:

Now this is cool - sort of a hidden bonus of the new AF system:

When shooting in live view, whether still or video, the AF system is unaffected by the lens aperture ... ie it works regardless of the aperture. So stick a 2x convertor on your 100-400 and you will still have AF ... and that AF can be on any pixel within the central 80% of the screen - no fixed focus points as every pixel is a focus point - you can just touch the screen to tell the camera where to focus.

The more I read about it the more I want this camera - for my work it could be a game changer, letting me do things which were impossible or very difficult before. I'm hoping the sensor is reasonably noise free, but frankly, if I can get the shot I'm happy to put up with a bit more work in post processing.

And the entry fee for this new technology is not prohibitive. Of course it does make me wonder what the 7D mk 2 will be like!

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineangad84 From India, joined Nov 2012, 747 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (1 year 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 5213 times:

Point taken Colin. I was indeed going off assumptions re: weather sealing.

DPReview has a spec sheet up that states the 70D is "water and dust resistant" and I've read elsewhere that it has the same polycarbonate-on-aluminum construction as the 60D. So that's nice.

Regardless of comparisons to the 7D/7Dmk2, the 70D certainly feels like a solid step up from my 50D.

And image/video samples are available here - http://web.canon.jp/imaging/eosd/samples/eos70d/

Those are JPEGs straight from the camera, so I imagine with proper processing, one could get even better results. The 3200 ISO jazz saxophonist was particularly impressive but the 1600 ISO butterflies were not. The samples also really highlight the importance of good glass. The waterfall shot with the EF-S 10-22mm is pretty soft considering the EXIF provided, but the bird shot with the 300mm 2.8L is ridiculously sharp. In fact most of the L-glass shots are good (135L, 24-70 mk2)

I really hope this can be made available before MAKS.

Cheers

[Edited 2013-07-02 04:56:49]

User currently offlinetrvyyz From Canada, joined Oct 2004, 1369 posts, RR: 10
Reply 20, posted (1 year 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 5206 times:

The jpgs on the canon website look impressive, wonder how the raw would look like. IQ seems to be not worse than 7D, the high ISO is pretty good at 3200, but too early to tell with these few samples.

User currently offlineckw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 730 posts, RR: 16
Reply 21, posted (1 year 3 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 5192 times:

I'm always cautious with Canon samples - doesn't always reflect real world ... though interesting point about lens differences. I think it is generally accepted that increasing the pixel density makes more demands on the glass (there's probably a relationship between lens resolution and pixel density)

Availability - just phoned LCE here in the UK (to put my name down!) and was told they were expecting them before end on month. They didn't have a firm price yet, but when I mentioned around £1000, they said they hoped to be below that.

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlinechris78cpr From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 2819 posts, RR: 51
Reply 22, posted (1 year 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 5164 times:

Seems like a very good camera with some fantastic features. A nice improvement over the 60D.


5D2/7D/1D2(soon to be a 1Dx) 17-40L/24-105L/70-200F2.8L/100-400L/24F1.4LII/50F1.2L/85F1.2LII
User currently offlinedazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2885 posts, RR: 2
Reply 23, posted (1 year 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 5154 times:

Quoting trvyyz (Reply 20):
The jpgs on the canon website look impressive, wonder how the raw would look like

I've just looked at a couple of them and my first impression is there's quite noticable noise in the sky on the waterfall photo, even at ISO 100. Noise control doesn't look too bad on the others given their respective ISO's, but from what I can see, it's not great either.

Darren



Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
User currently offlinetrvyyz From Canada, joined Oct 2004, 1369 posts, RR: 10
Reply 24, posted (1 year 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 5139 times:

Quoting dazbo5 (Reply 23):

Reply 23, posted Tue Jul 2 2013 11:50:13 your local time (58 minutes 18 secs ago) and read 13 times:

Even the 18MP sensor had noise in the sky at iso 100, based on the 60d I used, the high iso's look better on this one imo. A silky smooth sky is a thing of the past it seems.


User currently offlineangad84 From India, joined Nov 2012, 747 posts, RR: 0
Reply 25, posted (1 year 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 5153 times:

Quoting dazbo5 (Reply 23):
I've just looked at a couple of them and my first impression is there's quite noticable noise in the sky on the waterfall photo, even at ISO 100.

A lot of that has to do with in-camera processing of the JPEGs. You're likely to get much better results working from RAW.

Quoting ckw (Reply 21):
they were expecting them before end on month

Wow! I hope it hits India that soon too. I'll be glad to have extra time to familiarise myself with it before Moscow.

Cheers


User currently onlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 9776 posts, RR: 27
Reply 26, posted (1 year 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 5152 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Eh....I don't think there's anything here that would make me upgrade from my 50D. Then again, I'd probably upgrade to full-frame if I were going to upgrade. I personally don't see much point in going from 50D to 60D, 70D, or 7D, especially since I don't shoot video.

Quoting ckw (Reply 18):
When shooting in live view, whether still or video, the AF system is unaffected by the lens aperture ... ie it works regardless of the aperture.

Does that work in normal (non-live view) shooting too? I never shoot in live view, so just wondering.

Also, note that ISO actually goes up to 25600 (they call it 12800 standard, 25600 expanded or whatever....never understood why they do that). So there we go.



"Two and a Half Men" was filmed in front of a live ostrich.
User currently offlinedazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2885 posts, RR: 2
Reply 27, posted (1 year 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 5170 times:

Quoting angad84 (Reply 25):
A lot of that has to do with in-camera processing of the JPEGs. You're likely to get much better results working from RAW.

I'm aware of that but even so, it seems an excessive amount of noise at ISO 100. It certainly wouldn't inspire me to upgrade from the 50D on noise performance alone.

Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 26):
Eh....I don't think there's anything here that would make me upgrade from my 50D.

I agree.

Darren



Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 28, posted (1 year 3 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 5162 times:

Quoting Dazed767 (Reply 13):
For me 20MP is overkill, still love my 10MP 40D

I think the 30/40D hit the perfect balance between image clarity and noise performance. The 50D is very reasonable too, although dark cloud can lead to some excessive grain at times. I wish I'd kept my 30D as it was the best camera I've ever owned, all things considered. When I upgrade to FF later this year I will hold on to the 50D as it's the second best camera I've had.

Quoting trvyyz (Reply 24):
A silky smooth sky is a thing of the past it seems

Unfortunately yes, unless you go FF. Or unless sensor technology advances in the next few years.

Quoting ckw (Reply 14):
What it does have over the 7D is an articulated rear screen. I think this is quite important

I always find a tall set of steps often eliminates the need for this......  

Karl


User currently offlineckw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 730 posts, RR: 16
Reply 29, posted (1 year 3 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 5143 times:

Quoting JakTrax (Reply 28):
I always find a tall set of steps often eliminates the need for this......

Yeah, but you tend to find people object to this at a concert  

I'm not sure the camera offers that much more to the dedicated aviation stills photographer (video is another matter!) - but for me it addresses some real needs

Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 26):
Does that work in normal (non-live view) shooting too? I never shoot in live view, so just wondering.

No. In effect this camera has two AF systems. When shooting in live view, AF is performed on the sensor using Canon's new dual pixel technology.

When shooting through the viewfinder, the camera uses a "standard" AF sensor - in fact it uses the same one as the 7D (no bad thing!).

Each has advantages:

The 7D type sensor is going to be a bit faster and possibly more sensitive. Having owned a 7D I can attest that AF is a very strong feature in this camera.

As the new dual pixel system is working off the actual image sensor, lens aperture is irrelevant and it will also be impervious to front or back focusing. Also, most of the sensor area (80%) can be 'live' - you don;t need to compose around fixed AF points.

Quoting trvyyz (Reply 24):
A silky smooth sky is a thing of the past it seems.

'fraid so - even my wonderful 5d3 is not as clean as the original 5D at 100 ISO. But, the fact is, that in "real world" a bit of noise is simply not a problem - I've had a cover shot published which was shot on a 7D at 400 ISO - no trace of noise is visible in the printed product.

I think we've perhaps become over sensitized to noise by endless comparisons. Yes, noise is an issue, but there is I think a threshold below which it's a non-issue. In the last year or so I've been forced to push the ISO beyond my comfort zone on paid for shoots - it was do that or lose the shot. I worried about this A LOT at first, but absolutely no-one has commented on this. I guess we need to learn to accept that some level of noise is a fact of life just as film grain was.

I still think the manufacturer's push too many pixels onto the sensors, but on the other hand, I wouldn't want to drop below 10mp again which may be the only way to get truly clean images.

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently onlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 9776 posts, RR: 27
Reply 30, posted (1 year 3 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 5111 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting ckw (Reply 29):
I think we've perhaps become over sensitized to noise by endless comparisons

Maybe, but I have to agree with Darren:

Quoting dazbo5 (Reply 27):
I'm aware of that but even so, it seems an excessive amount of noise at ISO 100. It certainly wouldn't inspire me to upgrade from the 50D on noise performance alone.

My 50D has quite low-noise photos at ISO160 and less. The skies are particularly quite nice, since I hate having to deal with noisy skies!

Quoting ckw (Reply 29):
Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 26):
Does that work in normal (non-live view) shooting too? I never shoot in live view, so just wondering.

No.

Ahhh....well that's a shame.



"Two and a Half Men" was filmed in front of a live ostrich.
User currently offlineckw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 730 posts, RR: 16
Reply 31, posted (1 year 3 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 5094 times:

Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 30):
Maybe, but I have to agree with Darren:

I'm not sure these test shots tell us much - image 3 is noisier than I would like, but image 5 looks pretty good - both at ISO 100. I think image 3 is a tad underexposed ... and we know that in the case of the 7D underexposure is to be avoided!

I'm reserving judgement until we have some real world images from people who know what they're doing. I'm pretty sure these were all shot based on the camera's metering - its very seldom I've shot anything on a Canon without some form of exposure compensation!

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineGuitrThree From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 2040 posts, RR: 8
Reply 32, posted (1 year 3 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 5088 times:

Quoting Newark727 (Reply 6):
What would the WiFi be for?
Quoting ckw (Reply 7):

Not something I would want as I don't like the idea of sending/posting unedited files anywhere

It goes beyond that. My 6D has the wifi and with the iPhone or Android App you can do remote shooting. You can change all the settings, Ap, Shutter Speed, Iso, and see a live view on the phone before snapping the picture. And yes, then you can transfer the files to your phone/ipad/tablet. You cannot shoot live video using the wifi/app, however.

Pretty handy in some situations.



As Seen On FlightRadar24! Radar ==> F-KBNA5
User currently onlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 9776 posts, RR: 27
Reply 33, posted (1 year 3 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 5085 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting ckw (Reply 31):
I'm reserving judgement until we have some real world images from people who know what they're doing. I'm pretty sure these were all shot based on the camera's metering - its very seldom I've shot anything on a Canon without some form of exposure compensation!

That's a fair point. And I've almost exclusively shot full manual for the last 2 years, so can't comment too knowledgeably on that!

Quoting GuitrThree (Reply 32):
It goes beyond that. My 6D has the wifi and with the iPhone or Android App you can do remote shooting. You can change all the settings, Ap, Shutter Speed, Iso, and see a live view on the phone before snapping the picture. And yes, then you can transfer the files to your phone/ipad/tablet. You cannot shoot live video using the wifi/app, however.

Pretty handy in some situations.

That's actually pretty cool!



"Two and a Half Men" was filmed in front of a live ostrich.
User currently offlineckw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 730 posts, RR: 16
Reply 34, posted (1 year 3 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 5079 times:

Quoting GuitrThree (Reply 32):
You can change all the settings, Ap, Shutter Speed, Iso, and see a live view on the phone before snapping the picture. And yes, then you can transfer the files to your phone/ipad/tablet. You cannot shoot live video using the wifi/app, however.

Didn't realise that - if the 70D adds video, that would be a real bonus for me - I use a GoPro that way at the moment on location shoots ,,, the 70D would give me another angle with a wider lens choice. Since the 70D has a touch screen interface for focus it should be possible to incorporate that into the app. That would be cool!

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineGuitrThree From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 2040 posts, RR: 8
Reply 35, posted (1 year 3 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 5062 times:

Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 33):
That's actually pretty cool!

And I should expand just a little more. The camera can act two different ways in wifi. You can connect it to your home or any wifi network, and set your phone to see it through that.
However, it also will work as the router itself. Say you are out at the airport. You set your camera "to be the router" and then you connect your phone to it's wifi network (very simple to do). You can then use your phone for remote shooting and transferring of files where ever you want. You don't have to have any sort of Internet connection at all. You can use this wifi feature in the middle of the desert if you want. Of course, you can't send the pictures from your phone until you get service on it, but wifi will work anywhere for shooting/transferring.

[Edited 2013-07-02 19:36:06]


As Seen On FlightRadar24! Radar ==> F-KBNA5
User currently offlinedazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2885 posts, RR: 2
Reply 36, posted (1 year 3 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 5014 times:

Quoting ckw (Reply 31):
I'm reserving judgement until we have some real world images from people who know what they're doing.

But isn't that partly the point? Not everyone who uses one of these will be a seasoned professional and have a light meter and be shooting manual all the time. Most (and this is very generalistic) will probably stick to Av at f/8 and have done with it. I still feel a modern camera in this price range and class shouldn't be as noisy as that in the examples posted. They aren't exactly great adverts for Canon. Whether the exposure is off a little or not, there's still noise where many other cameras wouldn't be showing it. Other features aside, I'd be sticking to my current camera!

Darren



Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
User currently offlineckw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 730 posts, RR: 16
Reply 37, posted (1 year 3 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 5003 times:

Quoting dazbo5 (Reply 36):
But isn't that partly the point? Not everyone who uses one of these will be a seasoned professional and have a light meter and be shooting manual all the time. Most (and this is very generalistic) will probably stick to Av at f/8 and have done with it.

Well yes, but from a purely selfish point of view I'm only interested in whether the camera will work for me!  

There is no doubt that Canon sensors are lacking in both noise control and dynamic range compared to say, the Sony sensors used by Nikon, but are they good enough? Presumably Canon are well aware of this but have decided that pixel count and/or other features are more important as well as maintaining an appropriate price point. You could argue that for the program mode shooter pixel count is more important than ultimate noise control.

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineBestof79 From Germany, joined Oct 2011, 7 posts, RR: 0
Reply 38, posted (1 year 3 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 4982 times:

Hi, may this helps to some of the upcoming questions...


Canon EOS 70D key features

20.2MP APS-C 'Dual Pixel CMOS AF' sensor
DIGIC 5+ image processor
ISO 100-12800 standard, 25600 expanded
7fps continuous shooting, burst depth 65 JPEG / 16 RAW
'Silent' shutter mode
1080p30 video recording, stereo sound via external mic
19-point AF system, all points cross-type, sensitive to -0.5 EV
63-zone iFCL metering system
98% viewfinder coverage, 0.95x magnification, switchable gridlines and electronic level display
Fully-articulated touchscreen, 1040k dot 3" ClearView II LCD, 3:2 aspect ratio
Single SD/SDHC/SDXC card slot
Built-in Wi-Fi
Single-axis electronic level
Built-in flash works as off-camera remote flash controller
AF microadjustment (can be set individually for up to 40 lenses, remembered by lens serial number)
In-camera High Dynamic Range and Multiple Exposure modes (JPEG-only)
'Creative Filter' image processing styles, previewed in live view

The info is taken by the hands on preview from dpreview.com.


User currently offlinemegatop412 From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 309 posts, RR: 0
Reply 39, posted (1 year 3 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 4945 times:

Quoting angad84 (Reply 15):
when the disappointing 60D was foisted on us.

Really? Nobody's 'foisting' anything on you. If you lived in East Germany in the 60's and needed a car, and the only game in town was the crappy Trabant and you had to wait 5 years just to purchase one, then one could say it had been 'foisted' upon you. In our wonderful free-market society, you were always free to switch to Nikon if you were that disappointed in your upgrade options.

Quoting ckw (Reply 29):
I think we've perhaps become over sensitized to noise by endless comparisons.

Bingo, thank you, Colin. I would certainly be looking at the 70D if I was a Canon shooter, it looks fantastic. Can't wait to see shots uploaded here taken with it.


User currently offlineangad84 From India, joined Nov 2012, 747 posts, RR: 0
Reply 40, posted (1 year 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 4866 times:

Quoting megatop412 (Reply 39):
Really? Nobody's 'foisting' anything on you. If you lived in East Germany in the 60's and needed a car, and the only game in town was the crappy Trabant and you had to wait 5 years just to purchase one, then one could say it had been 'foisted' upon you.

Haha, easy there tiger. I just meant that the xxD line (as well as the 7D) was due for an update and I know many users were itching for something awesome from Canon and the 60D just felt like a downgrade, leaving us with a 2+ year wait for the 70D which is at least worth calling a successor to the 50D.

Quoting megatop412 (Reply 39):
In our wonderful free-market society, you were always free to switch to Nikon if you were that disappointed in your upgrade options.

A lot of people seem to think that's easy to do. At the time the 60D was released, I was in Uni and it had taken ages for me to invest in good glass for the Canon system and switching to Nikon wasn't financially viable. Maybe today I could do it if Canon dropepd the ball with the 70D and Nikon aced the top-end APS-C segment but for a lot of people, switching systems isn't so simple.


User currently offlinedazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2885 posts, RR: 2
Reply 41, posted (1 year 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 4866 times:

Quoting angad84 (Reply 40):
leaving us with a 2+ year wait for the 70D which is at least worth calling a successor to the 50D

I think that remains to be seen on the samples provided by Canon. From what I've see so far, there's nothing that really inspires me to swap the 50D's anytime soon. While it's far from the perfect camera body, unless you need some of the additional features the 70D introduces, mainly with video, is there really much of a step forward here? Full frame is probably the next upgrade path but that's not in the pipe line personally for the time being.

Darren



Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
User currently offlineangad84 From India, joined Nov 2012, 747 posts, RR: 0
Reply 42, posted (1 year 3 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 4846 times:

Darren, one of my favourite times to shoot is late evening/twilight and I have a very hard time getting good results in that light with the 50D.

I love the 50D up to ISO 200 in broad daylight but it's not fun early in the morning or late in the evening when the light is at its best.


User currently offlineckw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 730 posts, RR: 16
Reply 43, posted (1 year 3 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 4842 times:

Quoting dazbo5 (Reply 41):
Full frame is probably the next upgrade path but that's not in the pipe line personally for the time being.

I find it interesting that full frame is often discussed as an upgrade path (and I'm sure Canon are delighted to hear that!) - but I see it differently.

In effect we now have 3 formats capable of producing 'professional' quality images:

crop DSLR
full frame DSLR
micro 4/3 (and the various other offerings in this range)

While it is true that you will be able to detect differences in quality when pixel peeping on the computer screen, the fact is very few, if anyone will be able to tell what camera produced a final image - whether in print or here on A,net.

Forget image quality - they are all "good enough" ... it seems to me that what really matters are the inherent benefits and problems of each of the formats in its own right as these will have a much bigger impact on how you capture the image. (eg. size and weight; reach; frame rate; DoF etc.). In certain instances (eg. street photography) m4/3 may well be the better camera than FF. For aviation, crop sensors offer big advantages over FF.

In absolute image quality terms, FF may be better BUT it comes at a price.

Back in the film days, no one disputed the superiority of medium format over 35mm in terms of image quality, yet 35mm was still format of choice for many top photographers.

Ultimately, image quality doesn't matter one iota if the camera you're using is not the right tool for the job.

What Canon currently lacks is an upgrade path for the crop shooter, but presumable this will be addressed by the 7D mk 2

(in the interests of full disclosure, I have a 5D3 and an OMD-E5, which I use according to their suitability to the task. I have my name down for a 70D as it extends my flexibility. I know image quality from any of these cameras will be good enough to satisfy the client).

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlinedazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2885 posts, RR: 2
Reply 44, posted (1 year 3 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 4833 times:

Quoting ckw (Reply 43):
Forget image quality - they are all "good enough"

I quite agree Colin, which is why I say there's not really any benefit in an upgrade from the 50D to 70D based on the specs quoted, unless you want the video side of it. I have a Legria G25 for that though!

Quoting angad84 (Reply 42):
one of my favourite times to shoot is late evening/twilight and I have a very hard time getting good results in that light with the 50D. I love the 50D up to ISO 200 in broad daylight but it's not fun early in the morning or late in the evening when the light is at its best.

Which is where I think it remains to be seen what the ISO performance of the new sensor is. Looking at the samples provided by Canon, they aren't too bad at higher ISO's but not that great either. I regularly use the 50D at ISO400, even up to ISO800 if needed and rarely have a problem providing the exposure is bang on or preferably marginally over exposed. While noise isn't as well controlled as the 70D should be, it's still perfectly usable.

Darren



Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
User currently offlinechris78cpr From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 2819 posts, RR: 51
Reply 45, posted (1 year 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 4794 times:

I have to say it does make me laugh when i see people say "When i upgrade to full frame" and the like.

Like Colin mentioned, there are 3 distinct 'crop' factors today that provide images for many professional applications.

It really does surprise me when people think full frame is the way to go for aviation though. If you shoot aviation and aviation only with your cameras then you are by far better off sticking with a 1.6x crop body and spending the surplus money on either better lenses or some training on how to get the most from a well captured RAW file from the camera.

I shoot full frame for aviation alongside a 7D. Yes the full frame does a marvellous job at providing beautiful images but between my 5D3 and 5D2 i have about £4500 in cameras. That could buy a 7D, 70-200F2.8LIS, 1.4xIII and a 100-400LIS. The only reason i use full frame is because these cameras are used to photograph stuff that pays my bills and are used for aviation as a by product.

The 7D is a great camera, the 70D looks to be a great camera, i seriously urge everyone who thinks full frame is the answer to carefully consider whether you need it before spending ultimately what is a LOT of money. I find reach with my FF's becomes a problem as my 70-200 with 1.4 is only 280mm, my 100-400 doesn't work great on the 5D2 and on the 5D3 you have to be careful with it. The 7D is my goto camera for anything that needs 300mm or more as that paired with a 100-400 gives outstanding results.

This may sound like a rant, it really isn't i just urge people to really consider whether their needs actually dictate a full frame product when items like the 70D in question can be had for half the price and will produce a cracking image.



5D2/7D/1D2(soon to be a 1Dx) 17-40L/24-105L/70-200F2.8L/100-400L/24F1.4LII/50F1.2L/85F1.2LII
User currently offlineSilver1SWA From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 4770 posts, RR: 26
Reply 46, posted (1 year 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 4783 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting dazbo5 (Reply 41):
I think that remains to be seen on the samples provided by Canon.

True, but I'm confident that real-world results will show that the 70D will be excellent with regard to image quality and ISO performance.

Quoting angad84 (Reply 42):
Darren, one of my favourite times to shoot is late evening/twilight and I have a very hard time getting good results in that light with the 50D.

This is a great point. If someone likes shooting in more difficult conditions, the ability to shoot at ISO 800 and up regularly is a great reason to upgrade to a newer camera. I love my 40D, but it just doesn't cut it anymore when talking low light.

Quoting ckw (Reply 43):
I find it interesting that full frame is often discussed as an upgrade path (and I'm sure Canon are delighted to hear that!) - but I see it differently.

I see full frame as an upgrade because it typically offers superior image quality and superior ISO performance. But yes, you pay more for that. When using FF, I feel free to change settings without much concern for how IQ will be affected. That's a nice feeling after spending money on the "upgrade".

Quoting chris78cpr (Reply 45):
I have to say it does make me laugh when i see people say "When i upgrade to full frame" and the like.

Like Colin mentioned, there are 3 distinct 'crop' factors today that provide images for many professional applications.

It really does surprise me when people think full frame is the way to go for aviation though. If you shoot aviation and aviation only with your cameras then you are by far better off sticking with a 1.6x crop body and spending the surplus money on either better lenses or some training on how to get the most from a well captured RAW file from the camera.

I shoot full frame for aviation alongside a 7D. Yes the full frame does a marvellous job at providing beautiful images but between my 5D3 and 5D2 i have about £4500 in cameras. That could buy a 7D, 70-200F2.8LIS, 1.4xIII and a 100-400LIS. The only reason i use full frame is because these cameras are used to photograph stuff that pays my bills and are used for aviation as a by product.

The 7D is a great camera, the 70D looks to be a great camera, i seriously urge everyone who thinks full frame is the answer to carefully consider whether you need it before spending ultimately what is a LOT of money. I find reach with my FF's becomes a problem as my 70-200 with 1.4 is only 280mm, my 100-400 doesn't work great on the 5D2 and on the 5D3 you have to be careful with it. The 7D is my goto camera for anything that needs 300mm or more as that paired with a 100-400 gives outstanding results.

This may sound like a rant, it really isn't i just urge people to really consider whether their needs actually dictate a full frame product when items like the 70D in question can be had for half the price and will produce a cracking image.

I own the 7D and the 5D2 and I have to say there really is no comparison with regard to image quality at full resolution. 5D2 is the clear winner. At 1024x, you can't tell the difference unless both are shot at very high ISOs. When handling full res RAW files, going back and viewing 7D images after doing a batch of 5D2 images is like taking my glasses off at the end of a long day.    Ok, exaggerating a bit, but there is a noticeable difference in clarity and detail. But like I said above, FF is also an upgrade in high ISO capability. If you shoot aviation, but like to push boundaries in difficult conditions, FF will be a better tool. For me personally, that is worth more than the issue of "reach". But to each his own.

Back to the 70D vs 50D and the sample images. I see a lot of grumbling about noise at low ISOs on newer Canons. I wonder if you take a 70D photo and size down to 50D resolution, if the image quality would be same.  scratchchin 

[Edited 2013-07-04 10:26:32]


ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
User currently onlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 9776 posts, RR: 27
Reply 47, posted (1 year 3 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 4763 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting ckw (Reply 43):
Forget image quality - they are all "good enough"

Well, I'm not sure one can make that condition. Otherwise, there's never a reason to upgrade based on image quality, which I doubt is true.

Quoting ckw (Reply 43):
I know image quality from any of these cameras will be good enough to satisfy the client

My client is me.  
Quoting Silver1SWA (Reply 46):
I wonder if you take a 70D photo and size down to 50D resolution, if the image quality would be same.

That's not good enough, though. To me, that means no reason to upgrade based on IQ.

Quoting angad84 (Reply 42):
Darren, one of my favourite times to shoot is late evening/twilight and I have a very hard time getting good results in that light with the 50D.

I love the 50D up to ISO 200 in broad daylight but it's not fun early in the morning or late in the evening when the light is at its best.

Really? I'm surprised - I regularly shoot with the 50D up to ISO2500 or so (sometimes higher).

Quoting dazbo5 (Reply 44):
I regularly use the 50D at ISO400, even up to ISO800 if needed and rarely have a problem providing the exposure is bang on or preferably marginally over exposed.

These were taken at ISO1250 and ISO1600, respectively:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Vik S
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Vik S



Certainly true that slight overexposure helps.....as does practice with noise reduction.



"Two and a Half Men" was filmed in front of a live ostrich.
User currently offlineSilver1SWA From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 4770 posts, RR: 26
Reply 48, posted (1 year 3 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 4758 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 47):
That's not good enough, though. To me, that means no reason to upgrade based on IQ.

First of all, then don't upgrade. If what you have is good enough for you, then don't worry about upgrading. Speaking generally here, but people like to knock manufacturers because they don't release something that causes them to want to upgrade. There's nothing that says ones equipment must be upgraded every one or two generations.

With that said though, what I'm wondering is if this perception of noisier images on newer cameras is simply a product of looking at larger images.



ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
User currently offlineSilver1SWA From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 4770 posts, RR: 26
Reply 49, posted (1 year 3 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 4761 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Also, what's interesting is when the 50D was released, initial thoughts on IQ compared to 40D were similar to comments we are seeing here.  


ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
User currently offlineNZ107 From New Zealand, joined Jul 2005, 6406 posts, RR: 39
Reply 50, posted (1 year 3 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 4752 times:

A nice article showing the speed of the AF through live view.. http://www.canonrumors.com/2013/07/c...eos-70d-dual-pixel-af-performance/

Damn! 5D4, I hope you have this!



It's all about the destination AND the journey.
User currently offlineckw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 730 posts, RR: 16
Reply 51, posted (1 year 3 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 4746 times:

Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 47):
Well, I'm not sure one can make that condition. Otherwise, there's never a reason to upgrade based on image quality, which I doubt is true.

I don't know - is there a reason? Who's making the case? The manufacturers (for obvious reasons), the photo press (well they need something to write about) and our own peer group - we all like the idea of having the best.

None of these of course are objective! Nor are you or I - of course we can see a difference, but I fear we are becoming like those audiophiles who will spend hundreds of pounds on speaker cable for an improvement, which I suspect will be undetectable to 90% of people. And that's fine - we all have our obsessions, and if no one suffers, go and enjoy yourself.

But I think we are kidding ourselves if we say an upgrade based purely on image quality is necessary (I will grant an exception to those who specialise in high ISO work).

Has anyone on this site, shooting ANY dslr ever had a requested photo rejected by the client purely on the grounds of image quality? I bet not.

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently onlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 9776 posts, RR: 27
Reply 52, posted (1 year 3 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 4739 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Silver1SWA (Reply 48):
First of all, then don't upgrade. If what you have is good enough for you, then don't worry about upgrading.

I know. I'm not saying one has to upgrade. But I would expect image quality to be better, given the new sensor and such. The features on the 70D certainly aren't enough to make me upgrade - IQ would be the only possible thing (if I were looking to upgrade, which I'm not   ).

Quoting ckw (Reply 51):
I don't know - is there a reason? Who's making the case? The manufacturers (for obvious reasons), the photo press (well they need something to write about) and our own peer group - we all like the idea of having the best.

Absolutely. Though I can't afford the best, nor will I be able to for the foreseeable future. Reasons for upgrade are your own personal reasons, whatever they may be.

Quoting ckw (Reply 51):
But I think we are kidding ourselves if we say an upgrade based purely on image quality is necessary (I will grant an exception to those who specialise in high ISO work).

I shoot a crapload of high ISO, so it is important to me. Though with proper exposure / overexposure and some NR, I can get decent results from my 50D. Hence, I would likely only upgrade to FF.



"Two and a Half Men" was filmed in front of a live ostrich.
User currently offlineangad84 From India, joined Nov 2012, 747 posts, RR: 0
Reply 53, posted (1 year 3 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 4670 times:

Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 52):
I shoot a crapload of high ISO, so it is important to me. Though with proper exposure / overexposure and some NR, I can get decent results from my 50D. Hence, I would likely only upgrade to FF.

High-ISO when resized down to 1200px or so is far from a good measure of a sensor's ISO performance.

I always expose to the right with Canon cameras but I would never go beyond ISO 1250 with the 50D because while it may look good on A.net or anywhere else online, it doesn't hold up for large prints, and that's my yardstick for quality. FWIW, 1600 doesn't really count as "high ISO" anymore  

My point: at this stage, almost all cameras provide excellent results for me up to ca. 400 ISO, so I look for good high-ISO (1600 and up) performance when judging the merits of different bodies.


User currently offlinetrvyyz From Canada, joined Oct 2004, 1369 posts, RR: 10
Reply 54, posted (1 year 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 4658 times:

Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 52):
But I would expect image quality to be better, given the new sensor and such. The features on the 70D certainly aren't enough to make me upgrade

to some kind of photographers the new cameras make a difference, who shoots indoors and concerts etc. The new cameras shine in high iso's compared to a 40D or 50D.

You can try to replicate the "indoor" shot of 70D at ISO 3200 with the same settings on your 50D and you might see the difference.

http://canon-premium.webcdn.stream.n...sd/samples/eos70d/downloads/07.jpg
Tv (Shutter Speed):
1/400 sec
Av (Aperture Value):
f/4.0
ISO Speed:
ISO3200

[Edited 2013-07-05 04:39:55]

User currently onlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 9776 posts, RR: 27
Reply 55, posted (1 year 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 4605 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting angad84 (Reply 53):
My point: at this stage, almost all cameras provide excellent results for me up to ca. 400 ISO, so I look for good high-ISO (1600 and up) performance when judging the merits of different bodies.

I do too. That's really all I was saying. The 50D just happens to not be too bad to me for high ISO.

Quoting angad84 (Reply 53):
High-ISO when resized down to 1200px or so is far from a good measure of a sensor's ISO performance.

I know.

Quoting angad84 (Reply 53):
FWIW, 1600 doesn't really count as "high ISO" anymore

Hey, I was just going by what you said earlier:

Quoting angad84 (Reply 42):
I love the 50D up to ISO 200 in broad daylight



"Two and a Half Men" was filmed in front of a live ostrich.
User currently offlineangad84 From India, joined Nov 2012, 747 posts, RR: 0
Reply 56, posted (1 year 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 4587 times:

Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 55):
Hey, I was just going by what you said earlier:

Oh, I meant that the 50D is flawless up to 200, requires progressively more work up to 1600 (I frequently shoot at 1600, just rarely stuff I'm going to sell/print) and is pretty pointless above 2000. Not that I never shoot above 200!


User currently offlineckw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 730 posts, RR: 16
Reply 57, posted (1 year 2 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 4251 times:

For those (like me) who are waiting for the 70D with some anticipation, the manual is now online at

http://gdlp01.c-wss.com/gds/5/0300011965/01/eos70d-im-en.pdf

There's also a rather helpful website at:


http://web.canon.jp/imaging/eos70dshootingguide

I'm not holding my breath over any massive improvement on IQ, but the ability to focus by touch screen via a mobile app is a huge feature for me - so many shoots where I really need to be in 2 places at the same time! Should also make it possible to weatherproof the camera - maybe even construct an affordable underwater housing.

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineckw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 730 posts, RR: 16
Reply 58, posted (1 year 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 3784 times:

More on the new AF system from Canon

http://www.learn.usa.canon.com/app/p...terview_nonfacing_pressquality.pdf

What is interesting is the section on supported lenses - it would appear that 3rd party lenses may not be able to take full advantage of the new system. What I suspect this really means is that the 70D will detect an "unsupported" lens and change its focusing mode to suit. (Note the chart explaining what works and what doesn't).

Bottom line - if you use 3rd party lenses, the 70D may not be the best option - and it would certainly be worth waiting until real user experience starts to appear.

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Canon EF-S 18-200 IS: Good For Spotting? posted Thu Jun 27 2013 13:44:06 by Newark727
Canon 5Dmk3, Or My 7D? posted Fri Jun 21 2013 17:31:45 by CX Flyboy
New Canon 100-400 posted Thu Jun 13 2013 17:08:41 by ckw
Canon EOS 60D And 70-200mm F/4 L USM (Non IS) posted Sun Jun 9 2013 15:22:08 by FLPhoto
Looking For Proper Lens (EF) For Canon EOS 40D posted Sun Jun 9 2013 15:10:47 by u10arne
Canon 70-300mm Is USM Vs Canon 70-200 F4 L posted Sat Jun 8 2013 11:41:58 by dfinley
Canon 200-400 posted Tue May 14 2013 05:50:23 by ckw
Canon Vs Nikon, Low-light Performance posted Wed Apr 17 2013 08:51:09 by YXD172
Help With Canon 60D Settings posted Wed Apr 10 2013 12:32:47 by theweatherman
Canon EOS 30D 17-55mm posted Fri Mar 8 2013 12:26:21 by aeroalexGR