Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Question About Cutting Off Pieces Of Plane  
User currently offlinepowtaetow From United States of America, joined Jun 2013, 18 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 3 months 1 week 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 3702 times:

So I've put a few pictures in the pre-screening thread and been told it would be an auto-reject because it wasn't the whole plane, part of it was cutoff, etc. However in the database I've seen tons of pictures where the plane is cutoff, here's some examples:
http://www.airliners.net/photo/Russi...d=2941c3b749077c8489809fa8fa2960d2
http://www.airliners.net/photo/Emira...d=80b88032eebb4eabd15bed6f259e8db3
http://www.airliners.net/photo/Emira...d=80b88032eebb4eabd15bed6f259e8db3
http://www.airliners.net/photo/Unite...d=0054d272f108802adf6c6595ad82b371

These are all outstanding photos and I'm not saying mine would be anywhere near as good as those. But why are those ones accepted despite being cutoff? What's the criteria for letting it slide?

It's a little frustrating as I've been so pre-occupied with trying to get the whole aircraft that I've missed shots or been zoomed out more than I'd like.

Thanks

EDIT: This is another type of photo that causes confusion (don't get me wrong, this is an awesome picture) http://www.airliners.net/photo/Star-...d=8eb149c368c2dc239fa34af21af8d09c

[Edited 2013-09-09 21:40:59]

12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineangad84 From India, joined Nov 2012, 996 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (1 year 3 months 1 week 4 days ago) and read 3626 times:

I can't recall many threads on here except for your recent FedEx one.

In any case, your answer lies in the "Motive" section of the rejection guide - http://www.airliners.net/faq/rejection_reasons.php#motive

There are pictorial examples given showing how and when it is acceptable to crop parts of an aircraft.

The general rule of thumb is that it should "look right" and cutting off parts of the a/c should not seem accidental - as the result of poor technique or poor editing. You will find that most people cut off parts at the extremities of the aircraft (or in the case of helicopters, crop the rotor blades out) so that the aircraft fills more of the frame. However, taking an inch out of a h-stab or just clipping a wingtip is bad form.

I can use some of my images to provide explanation (because I can explain my own intentions better than someone else's):


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Angad Singh - Zone Five Aviation


Cropped so that fuselage and human activity fills frame. If stabiliser and wing had been included, the focus of the image would have been off to the right side of the frame.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Angad Singh - Zone Five Aviation


Cropped rotor blades because they're not central to the image - the helo and compressor wash are.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Angad Singh - Zone Five Aviation


Cropped the outboard engines and altogether (4-engine a/c) and the top of the tailfin so the fuselage and inboard props provide the focus. including the whole a/c would have led to a LOT of dead space above and below the a/c.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Angad Singh - Zone Five Aviation


Same as above - cropped to fill the frame, but left enough in to make sure the viewer new the a/c is armed. This time the tails are in, because it would look more goofy without them.

Hope this helped.

Cheers
Angad


User currently onlinescbriml From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2003, 12879 posts, RR: 46
Reply 2, posted (1 year 3 months 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 3604 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting powtaetow (Thread starter):
But why are those ones accepted despite being cutoff? What's the criteria for letting it slide?

Let's be clear, nobody is letting anything 'slide'. As Angad said, the shot has to be well motivated. Cropping a shot to place emphasis on certain parts of the plane is fully acceptable. More than anything, the picture has to 'look right' - more often than not cropping out half an engine or landing gear will result in a rejection. A side-on with part of the tail chopped off (cropped when editing or simply being zoomed-in too tightly when taking the shot) will also likely be rejected. For example, if this were tighter on the right and part of the horizontal stabiliser had been cut off, the shot would certainly have been rejected because there's no good reason for not including all of it.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Steve Brimley


Here are two examples taken on the same day:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Steve Brimley
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Steve Brimley


I cropped the Airbus tighter than the Emirates. Both are acceptable.

For more front-on shots, you can crop even tighter and leave out nearly all the wings:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Steve Brimley
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Steve Brimley



For a side-on shot, there's normally less reason to leave something out, however, from time to time there is justification. The SAS A340 is a good example - it's cropped where it is to emphasise the condensation over the wing. Had there been no condensation, the shot may not have been accepted. Here's a similar one of mine cropped tightly to emphasise the prop vortexes. If I'd included the whole plane, the vortexes wouldn't have looked as good:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Steve Brimley



Basically, there is a LOT of flexibility for you to crop shots how you please, but it has to look right as opposed to looking like you just framed it badly when you took the shot.



Time flies like an arrow, but fruit flies like a banana! #44cHAMpion
User currently offlineacontador From Chile, joined Jul 2005, 1421 posts, RR: 30
Reply 3, posted (1 year 3 months 1 week 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 3579 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Quoting scbriml (Reply 2):
Basically, there is a LOT of flexibility for you to crop shots how you please, but it has to look right as opposed to looking like you just framed it badly when you took the shot.


   



Just sit back, relax and have a glass of Merlot...enjoy your life!
User currently offlinejaktrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (1 year 3 months 1 week 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 3565 times:

The only one I see being a problem is the An-12 as you've awkwardly (in my opinion) cropped out the prop-blades of the no.1 engine. The other three look justified to me.

Karl


User currently offlineangad84 From India, joined Nov 2012, 996 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (1 year 3 months 1 week 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 3550 times:

Quoting jaktrax (Reply 4):
The only one I see being a problem is the An-12 as you've awkwardly (in my opinion) cropped out the prop-blades of the no.1 engine.

Prop blades all look intact to me.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Igor Zhuravlev



Cheers
Angad


User currently offlinejaktrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (1 year 3 months 1 week 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 3544 times:

So they are. Something really odd going on with the way I'm viewing images.

In which case, I don't see any problems with the way you've cropped any of the above photos.

Karl


User currently onlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 10335 posts, RR: 26
Reply 7, posted (1 year 3 months 1 week 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 3541 times:

This is the only one of yours I was able to find in Screening threads that dealt with parts of the aircraft being cropped:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/93321832@N03/9465346187/sizes/l/

There's no justification for cutting off the very tip of the h-stab on the left - it just looks sloppy.

It took me awhile to get a feel for what kind of crops look good on aircraft. Just takes practice.



How can I be an admiral without my cap??!
User currently offlinejaktrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 8, posted (1 year 3 months 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 3524 times:

Thing is Vik, there are a few images already in the database like that - and they're quite recent.

In my opinion no part of the tailplane should be cut in a side-on shot. I'm aware it's personal taste but it just doesn't look good.

Karl


User currently onlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 10335 posts, RR: 26
Reply 9, posted (1 year 3 months 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 3521 times:

Quoting jaktrax (Reply 8):
Thing is Vik, there are a few images already in the database like that - and they're quite recent.

If so, please email the images in question to the Quality Team so we can have a look and see if they were added in error.

Thanks.



How can I be an admiral without my cap??!
User currently offlinepowtaetow From United States of America, joined Jun 2013, 18 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (1 year 3 months 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 3515 times:

Thanks for all the responses everyone, it's cleared it up very nicely for me! I agree Vik that my FedEx shouldn't have that little bit of h-stab cutoff. I guess for some reason I got the idea in my head that pictures had to be all the plane and then I started seeing some of the examples above I posted and started getting confused. Good to know about the flexibility with the head on shots, now I can focus on framing better instead of frantically zooming out to get the full aircraft.

Cheers fellas!


User currently offlinejaktrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 11, posted (1 year 3 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 3479 times:

Sorry, I've read this thread too quickly and didn't realise that the original four you linked were not your work and are already in the database.

User currently offlinepowtaetow From United States of America, joined Jun 2013, 18 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (1 year 3 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 3415 times:

Ah yes, I wish they were mine   

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Easier: Take Off Or Landing Of Plane Photos? posted Sun Sep 2 2012 22:34:19 by airplane09
? About NOA_double: Multiple Angles Of Rare Plane posted Sat Dec 9 2006 00:27:35 by D L X
Question About LAX-focal Length posted Sat Jul 20 2013 19:29:54 by DeltaMD80
Question About Fences In Photos. posted Tue May 1 2012 23:29:07 by rendezvous
Noob With A Question About A German Jet posted Fri Dec 9 2011 14:20:10 by timschoh
Question About Canon 7D Flash posted Sun Jul 17 2011 08:35:35 by wilco737
Question About Photography At KUL posted Sat May 14 2011 15:49:36 by Alasdair1982
Question About Laptop LCD posted Sat Aug 28 2010 12:36:18 by paulinbna
Question About Size To Shoot In/Settings posted Fri Aug 13 2010 16:13:48 by airbusa322
Question About Double posted Mon May 3 2010 16:20:59 by compussr