Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Digital / Scanned Slides Comparison  
User currently offlinePUnmuth@VIE From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 4162 posts, RR: 54
Posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1549 times:

Hi!
Just a few pictures that where taken standing next to each other for you to compare.
--

Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Charles Falk



Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Peter Unmuth - Vienna Aviation Photography


--

Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Charles Falk



Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Peter Unmuth - Vienna Aviation Photography


--

Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Charles Falk



Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Peter Unmuth - Vienna Aviation Photography


--

Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Charles Falk



Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Peter Unmuth - Vienna Aviation Photography


--

No judgement intented. Just some pictures to look at
Peter


-
15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineGerardo From Spain, joined May 2000, 3481 posts, RR: 32
Reply 1, posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1448 times:

Different equipments -> different colors. Charles' pics look better to me in terms of colors. Why is that?

Gerardo



dominguez(dash)online(dot)ch ... Pushing the limits of my equipment
User currently offlineAirways From Switzerland, joined Mar 2001, 880 posts, RR: 12
Reply 2, posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1440 times:

Peter,

Can we get some facts about the equipments you were using? Thanks!

Michael
http://airways.ch


User currently offlineSkymonster From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 1413 times:

I raised this subject a few weeks ago with pictures of a British Airways 777 myself and Paul Dopson shot at Heathrow, and we had a previous topic on this from Gary/Andrew Hunts session in Singapore.

As with the previous topics, again its the difference in the colours that hit you immediately, and again I think I prefer the film based colours over the digital.

I too would be interested in knowing what camera was used for the digital (not so bothered about the 35mm!)

Andy


User currently offlineKingWide From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2001, 838 posts, RR: 19
Reply 4, posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 1411 times:

Since Peter's being a bit quiet, I think I can answer for him. The digital is a Nikon D1X.

When we were shooting together at Vienna we shot some stuff which is pretty similar and there's an even more interesting D1X and D30 comparison in the offing...


J



Jason Taperell - AirTeamImages
User currently offlineEGGD From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 12443 posts, RR: 36
Reply 5, posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 1399 times:

Are you sure he was using the D1X? Might'nt it have been the Coolpix 990, it does look like it..

User currently offlinePUnmuth@VIE From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 4162 posts, RR: 54
Reply 6, posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 1391 times:

Good morning!
Mine where taken with the Coolpix 990. As for the "darkness". I think it has two reasons.
1.) In My opinion the Nikons are generally on the dark side
2.) I used spot metering on the aircraft on this hot and very sunny summerday which might add to the effect a little bit more.
Peter



-
User currently offline5280AGL From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 414 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 1383 times:

The D30 and D1X are really not that good of a comparison, the D1X is far superior compared to the D30. I think the D30 and S1 are about dead equal in comparison, but I really like Fuji's colors better than Canon's, they just seem more film like to me. But as of right now, I think the D1X and D1H are the top guns.

--Chris--


User currently offlineAviationIvi From Germany, joined Feb 2001, 777 posts, RR: 7
Reply 8, posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 1375 times:


Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Ivica Ramljak - FRA Spotting



Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Kai-jens Meyer




Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Ivica Ramljak - FRA Spotting



Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Kai-jens Meyer



Kai´s pics were taken with a D30, mine with an EOS 50E


Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Ivica Ramljak - FRA Spotting



Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Konstantin von Wedelstaedt




Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Ivica Ramljak - FRA Spotting



Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Konstantin von Wedelstaedt



Konstantin has some more shots on a.net that we took that day. I tried to upload some more but still have some colour problems (always the same on cloudy days - they turn out too bluish)...

Regards,
Ivica



User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 713 posts, RR: 16
Reply 9, posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 1371 times:

Personally I'd very much like to see comparison shots of the D1X and D30 - while on paper the Nikon is in a different league, it uses a different type of sensor and obviously the image processing will be different. While it's a given that the Nikon has more pixels, comparisons within the pixel count of the D30 would still be of interest.

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineKingWide From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2001, 838 posts, RR: 19
Reply 10, posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days ago) and read 1356 times:

Colin,

Peter and I were shooting together at VIE and there are some very interesting comparisons to be made. I'll try to round up the shots from Peter and post them up here.


J



Jason Taperell - AirTeamImages
User currently offlineLGW From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 1334 times:

to be honest I am not to impressed with the Nikon D1X. Looking at the spec and price I am very dissapointed. I think for the value and quality the D30 is in a league of its own..but we havent seen photos from the S2 now have we!

LGW


User currently offlineDSMav8r From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 579 posts, RR: 7
Reply 12, posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1330 times:

The D30 and D1X are two totally different cameras...The D30 is marketed towards "serious amateurs" and the D1X/H is a pure professional piece of equipment. Professional doesn't always mean better image quality, although in my opinion the D1 series produces higher quality images than the D30. --->

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond1h/page20.asp

The big difference is build quality, features, and SPEED. Which is why there is a significant difference in price...But with the D1H at $3,499 the D30 at $2,999, and the S1 at $2,795 the difference isn't that dramatic.


Aric Thalman
Omaha, NE



To most people, the sky is the limit. To those who love aviation, the sky is home
User currently offlineCfalk From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 1301 times:

For your info, my shots were on Provia 100F. There are always tradeoffs with whatever medium you choose. One thing about slide film is that it has now become impossible to get a new c/s like Swiss on A-net as fast as anyone else, because it takes a few days to get them developed, at a minimum, and all you guys with digitals beat us to it!

I still play with what I do with my pics - each batch is treated a bit differently. I think I was rather heavy on the color saturation with those shots Peter listed. Even with close to 2000 pics on this database, I'm still constantly learning, making mistakes, trying new things.

It was great meeting Peter that day - unfortunately, I couldn't complete the day with him, as my dog died that day. But as George Carlin said, "Life is a series of dogs.". Here's Max, the puppy who replaced Buddy, who died that day (same breed).



How did I get to that subject ?

Cheers,

Charles


User currently offlineEGGD From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 12443 posts, RR: 36
Reply 14, posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 1275 times:

Aric, as far as the D1 being better than the D30 (and also the D1X being better), I have to dissagree. The price difference, at least where I am, is bigger than £1000, and as long as you take care of your camera, build quality should not matter. As for speed, (i assume you mean fps), that should not matter either, as I am sure that the only reason why a high fps was a plus for a slide collector because it enabled him to shoot many duplicates of one aircraft, etc. So really, for the price tag its not really worth it.

User currently offlineDSMav8r From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 579 posts, RR: 7
Reply 15, posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 1275 times:

Well, regardless of opinion, I think the facts speak for themselves. I honestly don't know how anyone could argue that the D30 is a superior camera compared to the D1X/H, unless there was brand bias involved. These cameras are in totally different class ranges, the D30 competes with the S1 and the D1X/H competes with the EOS 1D. Regardless of image quality, just the features alone blow the D30 away, which is basically just a low-end consumer body that was converted to digital format. Yes, the D30 takes marvelous photos, but it is not better than what the D1X/H produces...There have been countless comparison tests done between this group and the D30 has never won.

Obviously build quality and speed is a major factor for a lot of people, otherwise manufacturers wouldn't even bother making such a camera, right? You put a D30 in a photojournalist's hands for a couple of weeks, you will see why those things are so important, the D30 could not handle the punishment put upon itself for those applications, whereas cameras like the D1X/H and EOS 1D can. As far as speed goes, the D30 is inferior in both fps rates and AF speed. Speed is important too, not just to slide collectors....Wildlife photographers, sports photographers, etc...all need the capability of a fast frame rate and a fast AF.

Build quality, speed, and features don't matter? Hmmmmmm.... I guess us gullible D1X/H owners were duped into buying something we don't really need!  Big grin



To most people, the sky is the limit. To those who love aviation, the sky is home
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Red Stripe On Scanned Slides posted Sun Oct 26 2003 20:49:48 by LGB Photos
Having Some Slides Scanned To A CD posted Wed Oct 5 2005 04:30:25 by Dazed767
Where To Get Slides Scanned posted Tue Jun 4 2002 16:49:18 by Clickhappy
New Person New Digital Camera posted Sat Jan 10 2009 01:43:45 by Lubas
Canon Digital Rebel XT, XS, Or XSi posted Sun Oct 19 2008 11:58:01 by Lbox12
Onestop Digital HK posted Sat Aug 30 2008 02:00:08 by Rtl
Can You Convert Film Prints To Digital Images posted Fri Jul 18 2008 21:33:50 by 76794p
Help With A Scanned Image Please... posted Thu Jul 17 2008 03:53:30 by JakTrax
Canon Digital Rebel XT Or Nikon D40? posted Mon Feb 4 2008 20:04:28 by A380fo
Canon Digital Rebel XTi posted Sun Jan 27 2008 23:15:43 by SAN787