LGW From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Posted (11 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 877 times:
I was wondering. If my photos are TO BE looked at by the screeners and I upload more do they all go to the back or do they all go to the back AFTER being looked @ by the screeners
PUnmuth@VIE From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 4161 posts, RR: 56 Reply 1, posted (11 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 813 times:
Nearly Every topic i am looking into you are moaning about the screening time. Face it you are not the only one waiting.
wouldnt it be fine to keep the forum constructive?
Kind Regards
Peter
LGW From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 4, posted (11 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 772 times:
Thanks Jan. I have asked questions before but I don't get a clear and correct answer on what I ask.
All I want is information and I understand i'm not the only one waiting.
Anyway "Its always the same with LGW" - Gust
Well, saying its "always the same" is hard to beleive as you have the grand amount of 27 posts in the forums I hardly think you have been here and replying for long so how can you take a balanced view?
Im sorry Peter I annoyed you, you will hear no more from me about the screeners
Jer32382 From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 34 posts, RR: 0 Reply 6, posted (11 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 733 times:
I agree. I think someone from the top needs to tell us how it is done. Everytime i read a post from a screener, it is different everytime. I am really getting pissed off with the wait times, only to get rejected for stupid resons. There is definatly some favorite playing going on here LGW. If your name isn't on the list, they screen you 10 times as hard as everyone else. Just isn't fair.
FUAirliner From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 538 posts, RR: 3 Reply 8, posted (11 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 715 times:
Hi everybody,
I don't think it is very constructive if the photographers flame each other. We all should be happy that we are given the ability to upload our shots to airliners.net and share them with other photographers and aviation enthusiasts. We all should thank Johan that he has built up such a great site. None of us has the right to complain about anything on this site as it is Johan's site and I'm sure he does the best he can to make airliners.net as good as possible. We can only offer constructive criticism and suggestions.
As the net is getting bigger and bigger airliners.net is also in a process of becoming bigger. Johan and his crew are currently working in order to find and implement a solution to the increasing amount of uploads (the often-discussed new screening system), so there is some confusion going on right now, but I'm sure if the new system is established everything will clear up and the amount of complaints and questions will decline immensely.
So, Jer32382 and Gust (and others), think about it.
Kind regards,
FUAirliner (Frank Unterspann)
PS: Gust, if you read all the topics, you would know that LGW is none of those who always complain.
Sponsor Message: 
From , joined Dec 1969, posts, 
From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 4161 posts, 
From Belgium, joined Oct 2001, 147 posts, 
From Sweden, joined Dec 2000, 2043 posts, 
From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 34 posts, 
From Ireland, joined May 2000, 1523 posts, 
From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 538 posts, 
FUAirliner
Printer friendly format 
