Dazed767 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 5447 posts, RR: 53 Reply 1, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 1307 times:
They are a little bit, could use a bit more sharpening on them.
Chris28_17 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 1439 posts, RR: 11 Reply 3, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 1281 times:
I agree w/ Dazed.. they are a bit fuzzy and could use some sharpening
Planeboy From India, joined May 2005, 199 posts, RR: 1 Reply 4, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 1271 times:
you should see the only photo of mine of a flying plane
on Airliners.net. I have 77 here and the only "flying"
one is terrible compared to yours !!!!!!! It should
probably be deleted - it is pretty bad....
USAir_757 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 994 posts, RR: 9 Reply 6, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 1250 times:
Those photos are under-sharpened. They are soft but not blurry. Blurry is when you used a slo shutter speed and the plane is blurred, or the camera is out of focus. If you fix them, don't use the re-upload script, as it reduces quality adding JPEG compression. Instead just do the regular upload again and ask Johan to delete the older versions. I have to do that with this shot:
I have a bigger version that is sharp and has better contrast.
Now, if you under-sharpened those photos because you didn't want grain, then invest in a better program with a good unsharp-mask. You could look at the GIMP for Win95/98, it's far better than that "PhotoDeluxe" and is free. Whoever wants the URL for this program, e:mail me and i will give it to you.
Sponsor Message: 
From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 209 posts, 
From Australia, joined Feb 2006, 0 posts, 
From India, joined May 2005, 199 posts, 
From , joined Dec 1969, posts, 
Printer friendly format 
