PUnmuth@VIE From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 4161 posts, RR: 56 Reply 2, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1115 times:
Remember my Swiss rejection reason was not estethics but low Quality!
Esthetic was the reason on the Tyrolean. (I think the overall esthetic of the pciture and not her estetics )
Peter
KingWide From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2001, 838 posts, RR: 21 Reply 4, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1105 times:
Hmmm. They look perhaps a bit the wrong side of sharp to me. Perhaps a bit of extra USM would do it. I think it's a bit harsh. Perhaps you were caught in the same rejecton blizzard that led to this one of mine being rejected
Fly-K From Germany, joined May 2000, 3120 posts, RR: 53 Reply 5, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1103 times:
A lot of new photos are being added today, who's handling them, Johan or the screeners?
I'm confused again, 16 of my photos passed the first screening this morning, but I would have thought more photos are added directly nowadays.
Peter, on your photos, as Wietse suggested, sharpness on the first one, and overall, they probably didn't treat them as favourably because of the low sun.
Konstantin
Once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been...
Sukhoi From Sweden, joined May 2006, 371 posts, RR: 8 Reply 6, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1091 times:
Peter,
The first shot looks a little soft especially around the gear area a little bit of USM should do the trick. The second shot again is a little soft not helped by the lighting but both nice shots.
Lewis From Greece, joined Jul 1999, 3448 posts, RR: 5 Reply 11, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1026 times:
I think that the third photo isn't that aviation related, plus you cannot add a photo without the written permission of the specific FA as far as I know.
EGGD From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 12426 posts, RR: 40 Reply 12, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 999 times:
Lewis - As far as I know, you don't need any permission. I had a picture accepted with many (some visible) people in it, and was given a (stupid) warning saying something like: 'Airliners.net needs permission to show people in photos, and photographs like these would normally get rejected, but you do not need permission for this type of shot!!', I mean, wtF!
I agree that they need a little bit of USM, apart from that they are fine, especially the third
Sponsor Message: 
From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 4161 posts, 
From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 3809 posts, 
)
From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2001, 838 posts, 
From Germany, joined May 2000, 3120 posts, 
From Sweden, joined May 2006, 371 posts, 
From , joined Dec 1969, posts, 
From Ireland, joined May 2000, 1524 posts, 
From Greece, joined Jul 1999, 3448 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
){kind=link}