Serge From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1989 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (12 years 4 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 3266 times:
Thank you Jeremy for the response. I was very excited to get back those Eva Air shots, its a shame a.net doesn't like them Maybe once I but a negative scanner I will try to get them to HQ and appeal them to Johan if they are rejected again...
Thanks for liking the SFO takeoff shot, its a shame that one is "low quality" I'll see what I can do, I think its just the prints that causes it...
I have a zoomed out version of the last photo (Regina, YQR) that I submitted, It might get accepted because it shows the tail as well and an added bonus of a King Air rotating..
thanks, please keep the replies coming everyone!
FUAirliner From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 538 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (12 years 4 months 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 3241 times:
In my opinion, the three shots which were rejected for "low esthetics" don't have any chance. Appealing won't help. The wingtip in #1 distracts the picture a lot, #4 looks very strange (at a first glance it looks as if the wingtip was added with Photoshop) and the cut off tail in #5 also distracts the whole picture.
If you're able to get rid of the noise in the sky and brighten up the colours a bit, #3 certainly has a chance, but nowadays those kind of shots need to be excellent quality, so keep trying.
Regarding the people: Do you also have permission to publish the pilots on the internet?