Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Using A Lens Like Quantaray's 500mm  
User currently offlineMirrodie From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 7443 posts, RR: 62
Posted (12 years 4 months 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 2269 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I was hoping to shoot planes at LGA once the weather gets nice but before I buy a lens, I want to try a few zooms out.

I have a 70-200 but will be renting one or two zoom lenses from the neighborhood shop. Any suggestions or comments? I just threw in the one above to also get your opinions.

Thanks.


Forum moderator 2001-2010; He's a pedantic, pontificating, pretentious bastard, a belligerent old fart, a worthless st
11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 730 posts, RR: 16
Reply 1, posted (12 years 4 months 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 2160 times:

In my experience, handling long teles takes a bit of practice. Certainly my first outings with 500 or 600 lens produced disappointing results (camera shake, poor focus). Unless you've used this class of lens before I'd play it safe and look for something a bit more managable - I think a good 400mm might get better results.

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineDSMav8r From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 579 posts, RR: 7
Reply 2, posted (12 years 4 months 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 2150 times:

Handholding any lens beyond 300-400mm+ will almost always require using a monopod/tripod, unless you are using an IS/VR lens or a high-speed film (800 ISO or higher). The combination of the lens size and extreme focal length causes quite an excess of camera shake...Even if you have the steadiest hands in the world, 500mm will make it seem like you have the shakiest.  Smile


Aric Thalman
Omaha, NE



To most people, the sky is the limit. To those who love aviation, the sky is home
User currently offlineCcrlR From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 2233 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (12 years 4 months 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 2140 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I use a Quantaray 70-300mm lens. They don't have Sigma at Ritzcamera so I had that one. It's nice and it's easy to use. I don't use one hand, all the time I use two hands to hold it just to have a steady picture and I have good hands too so that makes it a little easier. What camera do you use mirrodie? If you have a lens that's past 300mm buy a tripod and that will help you but if you have good steady hands that might get you a good picture of a plane taking off or in the sky or any other picture where you don't need the tripod for.


"He was right, it is a screaming metal deathtrap!"-Cosmo (from the Fairly Oddparents)
User currently offlineAlaskaairlines From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 2054 posts, RR: 15
Reply 4, posted (12 years 4 months 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 2135 times:

I currently have a Nikon 70-300 f4/5.6. I am not impressed at all (quality wise)! I am suppossed to get my 80-200 f2.8 and 1.4x converter today, that will give me great shots and in focus!

The 70-300 gives me out-of focus shots unfortunately.  Sad I would consider the 80-400 VR though  Smile

-Dmitry


User currently offlineStaffan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (12 years 4 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 2124 times:

If you get shots that are out of focus my guess is that there's something wrong with the camerabody and not with the lense.



User currently offlineMirrodie From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 7443 posts, RR: 62
Reply 6, posted (12 years 4 months 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 2101 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I use a tripod which I why I wanted a higher focal length. I'd have good results with the tripod using a 200mm and doing 30 seconds exposures at night.

I'm not a total newbie though my experience is limited.

What's the difference b/w using a 400 or 500 lens vs one of those "mirror lenses"?

Thanks.




Forum moderator 2001-2010; He's a pedantic, pontificating, pretentious bastard, a belligerent old fart, a worthless st
User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 730 posts, RR: 16
Reply 7, posted (12 years 4 months 6 days ago) and read 2085 times:

BIG difference in size and weight ... but don't let it fool you - mirrors are just as prone to camera shake!

You've got no aperture control on a mirror - typically it'll be fixed to f5.6 or f8 - so exposure control is only via shutter speed. Depth of field is very restricted. Quality is not as good as a quality tele, but quite acceptable (except perhaps at the edges).

Cheers,

Colin




Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineC-GRYK From Canada, joined Apr 2000, 751 posts, RR: 37
Reply 8, posted (12 years 4 months ago) and read 2051 times:

Dmitry,
I use the Nikkor 70-300 f4-5.6 ED and I find the results are great. I think it has to do with photographic skill rather than lens quality if you are constantly getting out of focus shots. Keep working hard on your photography and you will get good results. You can't just pick up a camera and expect wonderful shots from it after only a few rolls of film. I find that my lens is very suitable for aviation photography and the lens certainly rewarded me with almost 800 perfect frames on my recent spotting trip to Brazil.

Jeremy



Think before you type!
User currently offlineMirrodie From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 7443 posts, RR: 62
Reply 9, posted (12 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 2039 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

SO bottom line is that I should get a good zoom? RIght now I have an 80-200 for my canon reber 2K.

What would you suggest? Thanks



Forum moderator 2001-2010; He's a pedantic, pontificating, pretentious bastard, a belligerent old fart, a worthless st
User currently offlineN949WP From Hong Kong, joined Feb 2000, 1437 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (12 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 2025 times:

Dmitry,
The 70-300 f4/5.6 ED works nicely for me. The shot below was taken with an F100 on Provia 100F, and I certainly don't see any quality problems image-wise.

Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Gordon Ho



'949


User currently offlineJayDavis From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 2000 posts, RR: 16
Reply 11, posted (12 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 2001 times:

If I were you, I'd hold out for the Canon 70-200 f 2.8 lense. They now have on that has IS (image stabilization) which would be great for airline shots. I have Canon gear, 1 EOS 1VHS, 2 630's and only use Canon lenses. Others on this board will tell you that after-market lenses such as Sigma, Tamron, Tokina, and Quantaray are good, but in my personal opinion, don't listen to them. Only buy Canon lenses!! They are made exclusively for Canon cameras. Others may flame me on my opinion, but oh well, I've got thick skin. I had a Tamron 200-400mm and hated it! Sold it within a week. Your camera body (The Rebel) is only a light box, spend your money on lenses !!

Yes, I have a top of the line and very expensive EOS 1VHS, but it still is only a light box.......my Canon 630's take just as quality photos as the 1VHS, but the 1VHS has more frames per second, more focusing points, etc....

Good luck !

Jay Davis


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Quantaray - 500mm/1000mm Preset Telephoto (T-mt.) posted Fri Jun 7 2002 20:06:40 by ScottysAir
Using A Lens Hood!? posted Sat Jun 1 2002 18:03:44 by Ndizani
Anybody Using A 180mm Prime Lens? posted Thu Sep 28 2006 01:07:23 by Lennymuir
Quantaray 28-200mm F3.8-5.6 Lens For Canon AF posted Tue Jan 10 2006 04:26:41 by Sokol
Question Pentax Digital And Quantaray Lens posted Sun Apr 10 2005 05:46:04 by TACAA320
Do You Like This Lens For My N80? Tokina posted Sun Sep 19 2004 12:09:10 by Lugonza_2001
Anyone Using The Canon 75-300 Is USM Lens? posted Sun Feb 22 2004 12:02:30 by Soren-a
Where To Buy Sigma 170-500mm Lens In Hong Kong posted Tue Mar 11 2003 16:38:21 by Sepang
Pictures From 100-400 L Lens Using A Non Digital posted Mon Dec 30 2002 16:50:00 by Tsentsan
Canon L Lens 100-400mm Or Sigma 50-500mm? posted Thu Dec 12 2002 07:05:15 by Tsentsan