Skyliner From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 204 posts, RR: 10
Reply 1, posted (12 years 8 months 4 days ago) and read 1500 times:
This appears to be the same product marketed in the U.S. as the "Prime Film 1800". I have had one for approximately 9 months, and have uploaded a number of shots to a.net with it. It is inexpensive, and I have no idea what it's longevity will be. On the other hand, as an inexpensive way to digitize photos from film, particularly for the net, where resolution is low, I don't think that it is a bad way to start.
FUAirliner From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 538 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (12 years 8 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 1450 times:
as George said it is a good slide scanner to start, but after a few months you might want a better one. Most airliners.net users use either a Minolta Scan Dual II or a Hewlett-Packard S20 which are slightly more expensive but produce a far superior quality. I was in the same situation about two years ago and I decided to save a little more money in order to get a Minolta Scan Dual II instead of a cheaper one like the Microtek Filmscan 35.
This is just my advice and I'm sure other forum members think differently.
Fly-K From Germany, joined May 2000, 3162 posts, RR: 51
Reply 4, posted (12 years 8 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1441 times:
I have the Microtek 35t plus - is it the same?
It was around 400USD 2.5 yrs ago.
By now it's a bit worn out (more than 5,000 scans), and it's hard to compete against digital SLRs. But it was OK in the beginning.
Once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been...