Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Lenses  
User currently offlineNight Hawk From Australia, joined Jul 1999, 273 posts, RR: 0
Posted (13 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 772 times:

Hi All

Im planning to update my camera lenses in the near future. I already own a Sigma 28-80mm macro lense which Im happy with. Its great for close up shots of planes but it doesnt do the job for those shots over distance. I've been around to a few camera shops looking but Im still not sure. I have a Pentax MZ-7 camera and was looking for a telephoto lens somewhere around 400mm+ zoom. One lens Im looking at is a Tokina 80-400mm lens with f4.5-5.6 for AUS$1095. I believe Tokina is a pretty good brand. Any other suggestions or advice?

Regards

Greg

2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineN949WP From Hong Kong, joined Feb 2000, 1437 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (13 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 739 times:

The way I see this lens:

PROs
- compact size
- 5x zoom; together with your 28-80, you're basically covered from 28 all the way to 400.

CONs
- Front part of the lens rotates when focusing. Could become a problem when you're using certain filters or if you need to put the front of the lens against something (e.g. window glass or wire fence)
- Lack of tripod mount. Weighing at nearly a kilo and with substantial increase in length when zoomed to 400, this is a glaring omission.

Since you might already be familiar with Sigma, how about their 135-400. Should cost about the same as the Tokina, although it's slightly larger and starts at 135mm (leaving you with a gap from 80 to 135mm). But then, it doesn't have the above two "cons" of the Tokina.

'949


User currently offlineDavus From Australia, joined Oct 2000, 174 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (13 years 9 months 1 week 1 day ago) and read 722 times:

Hi,
I have a sigma 70-300 that i purchased a few years back for my Pentax Z70 (same mount as your camera) for around 400 dollars AUS.
If i were you i would do something lile this and then look at a 1.5 teleconvertor or something. You will get out of it a fiar bit cheaper and wont have the problems taking long zoom shots that you WILL get when trying to focus and get sharp shots with the 400.

Just my two bobs worth.

Regards

Dave

MEL, Australia


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Image Stabilised Lenses posted Sun Dec 10 2006 17:49:29 by F4phantom
Which Canon Lenses To Go With EOS30D? posted Mon Dec 4 2006 10:29:16 by Lear45
Canon 350D And D70 Lenses posted Sun Nov 5 2006 00:03:08 by Jspitfire
Do These Look Like Canon L Lenses To You? posted Tue Sep 26 2006 13:52:18 by Manzoori
What SLR Lenses Should I Invest In? posted Wed Sep 6 2006 12:51:32 by BlazingCessna
Can I Use Lenses From A Film Slr On A Rebel Xt. posted Sun Aug 20 2006 06:55:58 by Flamedude707
What Camera And Lenses Are You Currently Using? posted Mon Jul 10 2006 14:46:26 by AussieAviator
What Lenses Required To Cover Farborough posted Mon Jun 26 2006 21:33:55 by LHRSIMON
Nikon's 80-200mm 2.8 Lenses posted Mon Jun 19 2006 17:24:46 by LukasMako
Flying W/ Long Lenses. Any Security Hassles? posted Mon Jun 19 2006 03:02:16 by Eksath