Ckw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 713 posts, RR: 16
Reply 1, posted (11 years 11 months 1 week 2 days ago) and read 988 times:
This is clearly the result of only having a few screeners available (3 I think at the moment) to clear the HQ list. Someone has put in a major effort and cleared a large chunk of the backlog.
The problem is, screeners (having, I presume, day jobs) will only have limited opportunities to attack the list. Once screeners in training are released onthe HQ, we will have more screeners across different time zones which should result in a much smoother flow of material.
Mirage From Portugal, joined May 1999, 3122 posts, RR: 15
Reply 12, posted (11 years 11 months 1 week 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 888 times:
I'm almost off to the airport Gary, just have to lunch. The weather is incredible here, 23º blue sky, not a single cloud and no haze at all, amazing light, one of those perfect days for photograph landscapes, crystal clear.
EGBB From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (11 years 11 months 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 839 times:
What my personal ideal world would be
In the last 30 days a total of 6150 pictures have been loaded onto Anet. Some days you may have a dozen or so, others 800+. I understand its all about when screeners can give time etc as to the amount that are uploaded but with an upload average of 200 pictures per day could a "buffer" programe not be written so a maximum of 200 pics per day are allowed? and these spread out over a day.
I know this may be easier said than done, and I am no software expert, but I am sure this would be sensible as it would eradicate the erractic uploads that we have at the moment.