USAir_757 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 994 posts, RR: 9 Posted (13 years 1 week 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 1104 times:
I find the image limit/requirement here to be delightfully odd: The minimum requirement is 800/600, which is rather "square" for a 35mm image, and yet the max is more appropriate and "rectangular" like a 35mm image, 1024/728. Now, don't you think the minimum should be either 800/500 or 900/600?
Note that i am NOT complaining, just curious.
-Cullen Wassell @ MSL | Pentax *istDL, Sigma 28-80 AL DG Macro II, Sigma 70-300 DG Macro
FastGlass From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 0 posts, RR: 5 Reply 2, posted (13 years 1 week 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 1069 times:
The standard aspect ratio of a 36mmX24mm slide/neg is 1.5. Whereas, the aspect ratio of a 800X600, or 1024X768 MONITOR image is 1.33333~. That's the difference. The aspect ratio of 35mm image differs from your monitor. That's why displayed pictures appear different than "real pictures", provided that they are scanned/uploaded full-frame, and not cropped...