Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
More Informations For Airliners - Why?  
User currently offlineBoeingholiday From Austria, joined Apr 2002, 456 posts, RR: 4
Posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 1692 times:

Hello,
this is again me. I've uploaded the photos which have been rejected because of low informations.
What shall I change?

http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=ohpzoom.JPG
http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=start4.JPG
http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=start5.JPG
http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=systemnew.jpg
http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=stick.JPG

Thanks for your help, best regards and greetings from the Tirol!

11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePUnmuth@VIE From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 4163 posts, RR: 54
Reply 1, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 1683 times:

What about the registration for example. Did the screener give you any personal comment?
Peter



-
User currently offlineBruce From United States of America, joined May 1999, 5056 posts, RR: 15
Reply 2, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 1681 times:

pic #4, what's 1800 ps?

pic #2, "in the back the fortress". what fortress? Where?

stuff like that I would imagine.

bruce



Bruce Leibowitz - Jackson, MS (KJAN) - Canon 50D/100-400L IS lens
User currently offlineBoeingholiday From Austria, joined Apr 2002, 456 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 1674 times:

hm... interesting. This was a photo which I've uploaded some time ago. Will try it again.

pic #2 - I can't believe that you are not able to see the fortress!  Wow!

No, I haven't got a registration. I asked the pilot for it but he couldn't give me an answer. Interesting, eh?


User currently offlineWietse From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 3809 posts, RR: 55
Reply 4, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 1671 times:

uhm... isn't it like all over the tail?

Wietse



Wietse de Graaf
User currently offlineBoeingholiday From Austria, joined Apr 2002, 456 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 1665 times:

Wietse, yes, you're absolutly right. I thought this registration-code wasn't up-to-date because of the fact that pilot couldn't tell me it. Hmpf.  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

User currently offlinePRM From Burkina Faso, joined Apr 2002, 351 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 1663 times:

Yeah, you could have included the reg - OE-EXS

Rgds



User currently offlineSonic99 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 1657 times:


Hi Boeingholiday

The rego number is perhaps the most important way of truly identifying an aircraft (single rotor, jet, etc). All aircraft have them. This information should be provided and, in any good photograph, the registration number is usually visible in order to enter the data in the upload page.

Also additional, or rather, more precise information in the remarks field adds a richer explanation of the particuar happenings at the time the photo was taken. This field is optional really but Bruce's remarks about the fortress in the background of the helo photo serves as an example of precision of information. (that chopper photo does seem a tad dark too - try to lighten it up a bit).

Third, proper aircraft information is preferred. I myself, at one point a couple of years ago, couldn't distinguish an A320 from an A330 (believe it or not). For me the reasoning was: "As long as it flies - what's the difference". I would check other entries in the database by doing a search based on the registry and find out the aircraft type and then make the effort to enter that data to keep a standard. There are other sources on the internet that help individuals identify aircraft types (fixed wing, whirlybirds, etc) by their respective registration number. Here are a couple of sites to start you off (no particular alphabetical order):

Canada - Canadian C-number registries search
UK - UK registries (g-number)
USA - US registries (N number)
Germany - German registry search (d-number)
Austria - Austrian registry search (OE-number)
Switzerland - Swiss registries
Netherlands - Dutch registry search
Australia - Australian registry search
Italy - Italian rego search


Hope these links help you and others in determining the aircraft type based on the registration number before uploading.

Stephan


User currently offlineBoeingholiday From Austria, joined Apr 2002, 456 posts, RR: 4
Reply 8, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 1614 times:

Hi Stephan, thank your very much for these informations, very interesting. Best regards, Markus

User currently offlineN6LUC From United States of America, joined Jun 2002, 3 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1569 times:

I think the 1800 PS in Markus' remarks under his shot is for '1800 Kilometer pro Stunde' -- Austrian for 1120 miles per hour (nicht wahr, Markus?).

Filling out as many of the drop-down boxes as possible in the submission form in addition to providing other pertinent information in the remarks section adds a lot to the experience of viewing your photo as well as increasing the chances that it will be accepted.

For example, if you had entered the Austrian registration number 'OE-EXS' in the drop-down field on the helicopter shot (even though it does appear in the photo itself) the viewer could search for other pictures of the same aircraft in the database simply by clicking on the registration number, in the same way that clicking on the word 'More' next to the airport location will yield all other photos in the database taken at that airport.

It is a good idea to keep a log of the shots you take containing registration numbers, aircraft manufacturers, type designations, versions etc to help insure you have the data necessary to fill in the blanks. Last night I spent two hours doing web searches to locate information on three Unlimited Class Aerobatic airplanes I had recently photographed because I neglected to take good notes at the airshow.

I liked your tack sharp closeups. The shot of the helo on the ground could use some work. Because of the backlighting it is difficult to get the brightness and contrast to come out right without the sky going white and the background washing out.

Nick Sharp


User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29799 posts, RR: 58
Reply 10, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1551 times:

That helicopter isn't dark, It just needs a bath. Laugh out loud

I have a feeling that it was probably leaving the registration off of it when it is clearly visible on the tailboom is what killed you.

The pilot really didn't know the registration of his aircraft. I hope he wasn't planning on radioing anybody.  Nuts




OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 18
Reply 11, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1531 times:

No Nick, PS is the German term for HP (horsepower). 1800PS means 1800 horsepower...


I wish I were flying
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
More Help For A Noob :-( Please posted Sat Nov 4 2006 23:29:49 by Brett
More Sunlight For Us. Daylight Savings Time. posted Fri Apr 2 2004 19:13:37 by Southpaw8669
More Zoom For DSC F717? posted Tue Jan 20 2004 22:55:38 by AirbusfanYYZ
I Am Embarassed For Airliners.net posted Tue Dec 30 2003 11:06:21 by Cathay112
Kodak For Airliners posted Tue Dec 16 2003 03:12:23 by Airliner777
Uncharted Waters For Airliners.net? posted Thu Oct 9 2003 18:59:40 by TZ
More Paranoia For The Mix At KSEA...... posted Tue Apr 1 2003 18:48:32 by Rsmith6621a
Another Success For Airliners.Net posted Fri Feb 16 2001 08:33:52 by Rindt
Johan: Suggestion For Airliners.net posted Fri Sep 15 2000 02:33:02 by USAir_757
Feedback For More Rejections posted Sat Oct 7 2006 09:26:53 by Monorail