Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Apperture?  
User currently offlineWietse From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 3809 posts, RR: 55
Posted (12 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 892 times:

Hi, just wondering what the 2.8, 5.6, etc. stand for. It can't be cm, cause 2.8 has a larger opening than the 5.6, but what is it then? Lux or something?

Wietse


Wietse de Graaf
6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 18
Reply 1, posted (12 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 879 times:

According to my old university optics course the f/number is equal to f/D' where D is the diameter of the entrance pupil of the lens and f is the focal length.
It goes on with an example, a 50mm lens with a 25mm aperture has an f/number of 2.0.
Then it goes into photographic lenses, stating that one f-stop in those is equal to a step equal to the square root of 2 (rounded), yielding the set we know of 1.0, 1.4, 1.8, 2, 2.8, 4, 5.6, 8, and so on.
Thus closing down 1 f-stop decreases the lens opening by 1 divided by the square root of 2 and the total light reaching the focal point of the lens by a factor of 2 (thus halving it). (it assumes you know that the area of a circle is defined as pi * the square of half the diameter of that circle, therefore the square root in the formula).

Hope this explains the mathematics behind it somewhat.



I wish I were flying
User currently offlineWietse From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 3809 posts, RR: 55
Reply 2, posted (12 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 876 times:

Ah, ok, that explains it. (seriously! it does!  Smile/happy/getting dizzy) So that's why 2.8 lenses grow in diameter when the focal length increases.
thanks,

Wietse



Wietse de Graaf
User currently offlineDufo From Slovenia, joined May 1999, 798 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (12 years 1 month 3 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 805 times:

In February there were some rumors about Canon developing a 500mm/F2.8 lens.. imagine the size of it!

Jernej



I seriously think I just creamed my pants without any influence from any outside variables.
User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 18
Reply 4, posted (12 years 1 month 3 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 766 times:

Not too bad, front lens in the area of 18cm diameter or more. Add the tube and you're up to a diameter of maybe 20cm.
Length of 50cm or more.
Weight a trivial 20kg approximately (not counting the dual tripod mounts it would need).
Price? €1 per gram like most lenses in that class for an inconsequential €20000,-- estimated  Big thumbs up



I wish I were flying
User currently offlineWietse From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 3809 posts, RR: 55
Reply 5, posted (12 years 1 month 3 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 755 times:

I saw a price listing for a 1200mm f5.6 L lense for 119000€. Is that a typo or is it really that expensive?

Wietse



Wietse de Graaf
User currently offlineTimdeGroot From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, RR: 64
Reply 6, posted (12 years 1 month 3 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 752 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I think that's about right. It costs 60.000 pounds!!!


Alderman Exit
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...