Squigee From Canada, joined May 2001, 652 posts, RR: 4 Posted (12 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1623 times:
Why is it that in this forum, most of the posts are usually rated at one star. Is someone taking out some pent up frustration? In the trip reports forum, the stars are a good way of deciding if you want to read a post or not because the ratings are accurate and fair.
Someday, we'll look back at this, laugh nervously, and then change the subject.
EDIpic From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (12 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 1570 times:
In the trip reports forum, the stars are a good way of deciding if you want to read a post or not because the ratings are accurate and fair.
I only read this forum. The other forums, (especially the non-aviation) is just idle chatter.
I don't vote either. The topic headline is usually self explanatory.
Why would I have to be guided to read something based on the opinion of others?
Well, I read some of the trip reports to try and suss what you're talking about.
Some with 2 stars, some with 4 stars.
I couldn't tell if the 4 star was better than the 2 stars reports.
I don't understand why anyone would want to go into such detail whilst travelling on an aircraft.
....or, maybe it's me. I'm the one that's odd.... (?)