Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Worried About Getting Pictures Approved  
User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9625 posts, RR: 68
Posted (12 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 1311 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

I would like to get some feedback from the forum. I recently went through my first batch of slides from my dad's collection, with the goal of scanning them and sharing them through airliners.net

I have picked the first batch, 30 slides, and I am sending them off to be scanned on a "Frontier" system, which should yield some high quality scans. I have requested a resolution of 1600 x 1200. The majority of the shots were taken from 1975-78 with a sweet Nikon set-up, on Extachrome slides.

Will these be good enough to get approved? I have tried to pick interesting planes, along with some of my childhood favorites. Among these include a National 747 (couldn't find any of these in the database) and some great 707 shots taken in Honolulu in March of '75.

Does anyone have any words of advice or encouragement? I am excited about sharing these photos, I am really rediscovering my love of airliners. It is almost like reliving my childhood.

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePPGMD From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 2453 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (12 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 1301 times:

I would recommend getting higher quality scans. You never know how much work has to be done, and maybe you might want to print a few.

I do all slider scans at 4000dpi and 16 bit colour, yes the files are huge, but it is worth it that I never have to do a rescan later.



At worst, you screw up and die.
User currently offlineSkyliner From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 204 posts, RR: 11
Reply 2, posted (12 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 1294 times:

Prior to acquiring a slide scanner, I had a number of slides accepted which were from Kodak Photo CD (not Picture CD) scans. I think that the medium resolution scan (there are 5 different sizes for each photo, from "thumbnail" to "huge") worked reasonably well. You'll need to have an image-processing program, and pay attention to sharpness (unsharp mask is a preferred technique), grain reduction, and JPEG compression at the least, and possibly color/saturation and lightness/contrast, as well. I'm happy with Photoshop Elements, which is considerably less expensive than the full Photoshop suite. The Kodak Photo CD offers a fairly inexpensive way to scan a number of slides at modest cost, if you don't have a dedicated slide scanner. My own experience is with Kodachrome/Fuji Provia, which are very fine-grained films; 1970s Ektachrome is not going to be as sharp, but you probably can deal with this via the image-processing program. Hope this helps, and we'll all look forward to seeing the National 747 on the site!
George


User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9625 posts, RR: 68
Reply 3, posted (12 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 1285 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Do the screeners apply the same standards to images that are 30 years old as they do to something taken with current technology? The database only shows 6,300 pictures taken from 1970-1979, while there are 213,000 taken from 1990-Current.

Do people come here for current stuff, or history? For the record I like a blend of both...


User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 18
Reply 4, posted (12 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 1249 times:

Officially they are not as stringent with older stuff, but that's not my experience (got one shot accepted out of 3 that were about 15 years old last year, none since).


I wish I were flying
User currently offlineSkymonster From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (12 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 1235 times:

Clickhappy,

The site FAQ's make it clear that standards can be reduced for "rare" subjects. There have been some recent period contributions that have made it to the database - whilst the pictures to which I refer are in themselves magnificent (as far as I am concerned) some of them may not have made it if they were of regular stuff taken in 2002. So the answer is yes, if the subject matter is rare/unusual/historic, not already in the database, and unlikely to be covered again, some degree of compromise is quite possible. However, clearly there is a point at which that process stops, and without seeing the results themselves and without knowing exactly what the subject matter is, it is not possible to make a guarantee. One piece of advice - don't get sloppy just because you have some older material, as even older material can be badly processed or well processed.

Bottom line - give it a go and I too look forward to seeing some of them.

Andy


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
I'm Unsure About Two Pictures- Can You Help? posted Sat Jun 2 2007 14:11:18 by Carlos
Thinking About Getting A Manual Pentax posted Mon Jun 17 2002 11:02:12 by L-188
What Would You Say Is Wrong About These Pictures? posted Fri Mar 23 2001 16:32:13 by Thom@s
Getting Pictures Accepted posted Mon Apr 3 2000 07:50:57 by WiL SW737
How About Exif In A.net Pictures? posted Thu Jan 17 2008 10:30:34 by Thijsz1
Bad Email About One Of Pictures posted Mon Mar 29 2004 03:39:54 by Paulinbna
Anyone Else Getting Spam Directly From Pictures? posted Wed Dec 17 2003 00:56:21 by Qantas744
Getting A Shot From A Fujifilm Finepix J10? posted Fri Feb 13 2009 10:30:08 by LastTrainHome
A Quick Note About Frecce Tricolori Uploads posted Sun Jan 25 2009 03:01:02 by GPHOTO
Pictures Of Concorde Flight BA1 June 30, 2003 posted Sat Jan 24 2009 04:10:54 by Wrslade