Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AF VR Zoom-Nikkor 80-400mm F/4.5-5.6D  
User currently offlineMikephotos From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 2923 posts, RR: 54
Posted (13 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 3211 times:

Sunil mentioned this lens in the "Kodachrome" discussion and was wondering if anyone had a chance to check it out yet.

Here's some info on it from the Nikon site: click here


click for larger picture


Comments?

Michael

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFastGlass From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 0 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (13 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 3182 times:

Earlier in the year Nikon promised that this lens would be available for purchase in the summer, then the fall, then later in the year. I know I would like to play with one, and probably buy one, but there are none in sight. Maybe they are, in NYC.

Is Nikon having "problems" with this lens?


User currently offlineAPP From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2000, 546 posts, RR: 6
Reply 2, posted (13 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 3177 times:

I'd love one on an F80, but that'll cost around £1800 in the UK.
I'll have to start saving I guess.
APP


User currently offlineFastGlass From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 0 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (13 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 3172 times:

Good you have an N80, as it is one of only three Nikon FILM SLRS where the VR feature will function. It will not be active on the N90s, N70, or lower.

User currently offlineN949WP From Hong Kong, joined Feb 2000, 1437 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (13 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 3170 times:

Actually the official release date of this lens was Nov. 2000. Here in HKG, the camera store where I usually bought my stuff from had a couple of them that came in last week and they were snapped up immediately. Cost slightly less than the AF-S 80-200 f/2.8 at around US$1360.

Still waiting for one of the major photography magazines to do an evaluation, although I know some magazines in Japan have already done that (if only I can read Japanese!!) The one thing I want to find out the most is whether the VR function will still work when coupled to an AF tele-converter. Imagine....an 800mm with 3-stop VR compensation!!

'949


User currently offlineFastGlass From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 0 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (13 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 3166 times:

$1360 USD would be a real bargain here (in the US) from the estimates I have been watching the past few months. I agree though, that I wont invest that kind of money until I read a few reviews.

User currently offlineMikephotos From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 2923 posts, RR: 54
Reply 6, posted (13 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 3165 times:

$1360 is not bad, at all. And the heck with the reviews. I'd like to get my hands on one to try out for 7 days (I believe that's B&H's return policy - I could be wrong) Shoot everything and anything I can think of, get the slides back and examine them closely. If they are sharp and the lens is built solid, I'll take it.

Michael


User currently offlineSunilgupta From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 776 posts, RR: 14
Reply 7, posted (13 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 3166 times:

Mike, FastGlass, all,

Here are the reviews that I have found on the web so far:

http://www.foto.no/nikon/lens_zoom.html
http://www.moose395.net/hot.html
http://www.photographyreview.com/reviews/35mm_zoom_lenses/product_6040.asp

plus I talked to a sports photographer who has used one and he said he shot racing speedboats in low light, hand held with asa 100 film and the shots were tack-sharp.

It’s a mixed bag of reviews. The consensus seems to be:

Pros:
- it’s a very sharp lens edge-to-edge
- the VR works well

Cons:

- it’s not AI-S (Silent Wave)
- it’s not constant aperture (e.g. f4)

Nonetheless, I’m going to get it as soon as I can get my grubby hands on one. The local place here will sell it for $1499. That's not bad considering gray market was going for > $1600 here in the US.

Sunil


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Nikkor 80-400mm ED VR Opinions posted Wed Jan 18 2006 21:56:31 by Shaggy
Sigma 80-400mm OS Vs. Nikkor 80-400mm VR posted Thu Jul 14 2005 05:03:08 by Yanqui67
Nikkor 80-400MM Trouble/help! posted Mon Nov 8 2004 04:32:21 by FlyingColors
Just How Slow Is The 80-400mm VR Nikkor? posted Wed May 31 2006 07:46:54 by IAH777
Nikon 80-400mm VR posted Tue Feb 27 2001 12:50:31 by Dsmav8r
Any One Already Bought The Nikon's AF VR 80-400? posted Wed Jan 17 2001 12:12:42 by Sia jubilee
Nikkor 80-400VR...mode 1 Or 2 posted Mon Aug 21 2006 15:43:04 by Nucky
My Thoughts On The Sigma 80-400mm OS Lens (Nikon). posted Tue Dec 13 2005 21:49:48 by Yanqui67
Sigma 80-400mm OS -- Anyone? posted Tue Dec 9 2003 07:11:31 by Rotor1
Nikon 70-200mm F/2.8G AF-S VR Opinions? posted Sat Nov 22 2003 22:12:37 by Pilothighflyer