AndrewAir From United States of America, joined Jul 2002, 361 posts, RR: 0 Posted (10 years 10 months 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 1300 times:
Hi,
I've been taking pictures for a while but my pictures are still bad quality. So I went out
and bought all new camera equipment, Canon 7E, with Canon 75-300mm and 35-90mm
USM lens. But when I used my new camera there still was not a difference in quality. I've
tried everything, different ISO, different lens...Etc, but still my pictures come out bad.
One thing that I have not tried are filters. Can anyone help me out.
Thanks
Setjet From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 1086 posts, RR: 0 Reply 1, posted (10 years 10 months 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 1285 times:
This picture is HORRIBLE!
Of course just kidding: What's wrong with the picture? What's your point? Explain a little more why you think that your pictures are "bad".
AndrewAir From United States of America, joined Jul 2002, 361 posts, RR: 0 Reply 2, posted (10 years 10 months 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 1279 times:
Well, all of my photos have been rejected. Is there anything that i'm doing wrong with the camera?
I just think the picture(s) are bad because all of my photos have been rejected because of the image quality of the photo.
AndrewAir From United States of America, joined Jul 2002, 361 posts, RR: 0 Reply 4, posted (10 years 10 months 1 week 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1264 times:
My scanner is not the best. The max is 2400. I don't think it is the scanner because even on the print its like that. Thanks
Wietse From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 3809 posts, RR: 57 Reply 5, posted (10 years 10 months 1 week 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1261 times:
Are you getting it developed in some kind of Supermarket or a grocer like Walmart or K-mart? Because that will affect your picture quality. Also, what kind of 200ASA film was this? You gotta stick with Kodak or Fuji. last, but not least, 200 is a bit high, better switch to 100 or lower - better grain and balance. For print film I can highly recommend Fuji Superia Reala 100 or Kodak Supra, very nice prints. And get them developed at a photo hobbyshop, a small one with a good Professional Processing lab.
Sponsor Message: 
From United States of America, joined Jul 2002, 361 posts, 
From Lebanon, joined Aug 1999, 701 posts, 
From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 3809 posts, 
From Mexico, joined Mar 2000, 5127 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
