AndrewAir From United States of America, joined Jul 2002, 361 posts, RR: 0 Posted (11 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 2127 times:
I've been taking pictures for a while but my pictures are still bad quality. So I went out
and bought all new camera equipment, Canon 7E, with Canon 75-300mm and 35-90mm
USM lens. But when I used my new camera there still was not a difference in quality. I've
tried everything, different ISO, different lens...Etc, but still my pictures come out bad.
One thing that I have not tried are filters. Can anyone help me out.
AndrewAir From United States of America, joined Jul 2002, 361 posts, RR: 0 Reply 2, posted (11 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 2106 times:
Well, all of my photos have been rejected. Is there anything that i'm doing wrong with the camera?
I just think the picture(s) are bad because all of my photos have been rejected because of the image quality of the photo.
Wietse From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 3809 posts, RR: 56 Reply 5, posted (11 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 2088 times:
Are you getting it developed in some kind of Supermarket or a grocer like Walmart or K-mart? Because that will affect your picture quality. Also, what kind of 200ASA film was this? You gotta stick with Kodak or Fuji. last, but not least, 200 is a bit high, better switch to 100 or lower - better grain and balance. For print film I can highly recommend Fuji Superia Reala 100 or Kodak Supra, very nice prints. And get them developed at a photo hobbyshop, a small one with a good Professional Processing lab.