Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Cheat?  
User currently offlineDanny From Poland, joined Apr 2002, 3509 posts, RR: 2
Posted (12 years 2 months 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 3004 times:

Look at this one:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Tim de Groot


I have never heard about A360. There in nothing like that on Airbus.com which leads me to suggestion that this is dirty cheat.
If it is confirmed, people doing this should be banned and never uploded again.
If I am wrong - appologize.

27 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineWietse From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 3809 posts, RR: 55
Reply 1, posted (12 years 2 months 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 2921 times:

sigh.........

haven't anyone on this site heard of cynisism?????? Look at the real posting, it says A320, and if you'd just take a closer look, you'll see its just a L1011 parked behind the A320.....

Goodmorning!

ps, i've scanned the damn slide and it is my hands right now, and i tell ya, its not a cheat...!

Wietse



Wietse de Graaf
User currently offlineEGGD From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 12443 posts, RR: 34
Reply 2, posted (12 years 2 months 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 2904 times:

/me hits danny with the gullible stick

User currently offlineDanny From Poland, joined Apr 2002, 3509 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (12 years 2 months 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 2901 times:

So it seems that foto is real but description false to increase views number - I noticed that beacause it is almost the most popular of 24h while other shots of this A320 had usually around 100 view.
It is not very nice method.


User currently offlineEGGD From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 12443 posts, RR: 34
Reply 4, posted (12 years 2 months 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 2889 times:

Nope, I think people probably viewed it because it really does look like a tristar/A320 hybrid as a thumbnail..

User currently offlineWietse From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 3809 posts, RR: 55
Reply 5, posted (12 years 2 months 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 2899 times:

I'll just let Tim reply to this one...


Wietse de Graaf
User currently offlineDanny From Poland, joined Apr 2002, 3509 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (12 years 2 months 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 2892 times:

Maybe. So I appologize a photographer.
But correct description aying "new Airbus 360!"


User currently offlineTimdegroot From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, RR: 64
Reply 7, posted (12 years 2 months 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 2896 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

And once again Dan hits the spot.

Come on Danny (other one), you are the only person who doesn't like the shot, and frankly I don't think you get the point.

/Tim



Alderman Exit
User currently offlineToady From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 724 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (12 years 2 months 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 2896 times:

And the fact that there are 2 threads (here & in Civ Av) about this photograph probably attracts a few hits!

Danny, it's a highly unusual photograph. People want to see it for its own sake, not for its caption.


User currently offlineDanny From Poland, joined Apr 2002, 3509 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (12 years 2 months 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 2889 times:

I like the shot but not misleading description
"It's the brand new Airbus A360! I didn't even notice this until I got my slides back"


User currently offlineWietse From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 3809 posts, RR: 55
Reply 10, posted (12 years 2 months 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 2878 times:

Got dumped today or something? it isn't misleading! it is a thing we call "HUMOR"



Wietse de Graaf
User currently offlineTimdegroot From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, RR: 64
Reply 11, posted (12 years 2 months 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 2870 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

oh come one, who would believe it is actually an A360?

As an frequent A.net user (which I'm sure you are) you should know better,
can't you have a laugh once in a while. Is it really so terrible for you that people view my picture? Didn't you enjoy it a tiny bit Smile?

Tim



Alderman Exit
User currently offlineStaffan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (12 years 2 months 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 2866 times:

I was fooled too, where can I file a lawsuit?  Big grin

Cool shot, but you shouldn't have written that it wasn't done on purpose Big grin

Staffan



User currently offlineWietse From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 3809 posts, RR: 55
Reply 13, posted (12 years 2 months 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 2862 times:

Nah... always pretend like you meant for it to happen. makes you look like a pro!  Big thumbs up


Wietse de Graaf
User currently offlineDanny From Poland, joined Apr 2002, 3509 posts, RR: 2
Reply 14, posted (12 years 2 months 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 2866 times:

OK I give up. Delete topic and forget it.

Sorry Tim.


User currently offlineWietse From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 3809 posts, RR: 55
Reply 15, posted (12 years 2 months 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 2859 times:

Sorry if I were a bit harsh, but you're like the third this evening thinking it was a fraud!

No hard feelings,
Wietse



Wietse de Graaf
User currently offlineEGGD From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 12443 posts, RR: 34
Reply 16, posted (12 years 2 months 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 2821 times:

Staffan - If you get Greg on the case, I think you've got a good chance of winning this one  Smile

'intent to mislead, contributing to considerable mental anguish'.

hehe  Big thumbs up


User currently offlineRes From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 417 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (12 years 2 months 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 2793 times:

Danny...do we need to turn down the sarcasm level here? Give it a rest.


FLY NAVY
User currently offlineEGFF From UK - Wales, joined Sep 2001, 2201 posts, RR: 12
Reply 18, posted (12 years 2 months 3 days ago) and read 2704 times:

I do feel it's a 'stint' to get more hints, i laughed when i saw it Wietse  Big grin
Danny ... abit too gullable i think mate  Laugh out loud
EGFF (Nice shot Wietse)  Big thumbs up



All together or not at all
User currently offlineWietse From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 3809 posts, RR: 55
Reply 19, posted (12 years 2 months 3 days ago) and read 2694 times:

Hello.... sorry shaun... But it's Tims! I just scanned it! Wish I shot it though...


Wietse de Graaf
User currently offlineEGFF From UK - Wales, joined Sep 2001, 2201 posts, RR: 12
Reply 20, posted (12 years 2 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 2663 times:

LOL Wietse, not my day today ... a little tired and not reading properly  Laugh out loud
EGFF



All together or not at all
User currently offlineFACT From South Africa, joined Jul 2002, 200 posts, RR: 5
Reply 21, posted (12 years 2 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 2639 times:

Submissions from User 1:
a) Comment: Its an L1011-500 no such thing a n Airbus A350
b) Comment: Oops the L1011 is behind the airplane never mind trick photo

Submission from User 2:
Aircraft: Lockheed L-1011 Tristar

Submission from User 3:
Comment: IT CERTAINLY LOOKS LIKE AN L-1011 TO ME, PLEASE CHECK IF YOU'RE SURE ITS AN A360, WHICH DOES NOT EVEN EXIST!

Submissions from User 4:
a) Aircraft: Airbus A360
b) Comment: Sorry another suggestion. I think the whole photo is a cheat - Airbus 360 does not exist!

Submission from User 5:
Comment: There is nothing is Airbus 360, it is only Tristar in the back , that is all


Sometimes these "corrections" make me laugh Big grin

Andrew
Corrections Editor



there are 10 kinds of people: those who understand binary, and those who don't
User currently offlineTimdegroot From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, RR: 64
Reply 22, posted (12 years 2 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 2636 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Yeah , I bet there were a lot of confused people around, and also many who didn't get the joke Smile, and didn't bother to look at the actual type A320-231.
That should have gave it away.

You wouldn't believe how many emails I got saying "there's no such thing as an A360" or "this is just a photoshop fake" (hate that one). Only when I explained it, people went like "oh great shot" or similar comments Smile

btw, I hope it didn't cause any hassle for you Andrew.

/Tim




Alderman Exit
User currently offlineDanny From Poland, joined Apr 2002, 3509 posts, RR: 2
Reply 23, posted (12 years 2 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 2607 times:

Thanx for the last post Tim.
Means that I wasn't the only one stupid yesterday.



User currently offlineFACT From South Africa, joined Jul 2002, 200 posts, RR: 5
Reply 24, posted (12 years 2 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 2614 times:

No probs, Tim ... deleting those submissions is no real effort  Big grin

Something to consider, though : Smilies in the comments. e.g.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Dieter Spiess gen. Bongard



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Wietse de Graaf
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Frederik Adam



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Peter Unmuth - Vienna Aviation Photography
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Steve Hall


Would make the more gullible amongst us less confused  Smile



there are 10 kinds of people: those who understand binary, and those who don't
25 Timdegroot : Good point Andrew, I will do that in any future comments. /Tim
26 EGGD : I suspect that 80% of people who emailed corrections for that photo were German
27 AndrewAir : I don't think Its that big of a deal. So what if he got more hits then normal, its just humor.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Cheat? posted Sun Jul 21 2002 23:47:10 by Danny