Jgore From Argentina, joined Feb 2002, 550 posts, RR: 2 Posted (12 years 10 months 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 3201 times:
I was told it was too grainy.
The picture itself has a great sharpness and is the scanner i used (a borrowed one) that is not that good. If i get to re-scan it in a good one, may be i can have a second try.
Anyhow, hope it to be accepted.
What do you think?
Any tips or suggestion on the seccond try ? (regarding the scanner).
Skymonster From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (12 years 10 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 3164 times:
I suspect that it will be rejected badperson - certainly, I will have to reject it for that reason if I get it for screening. The guy on the right is pretty clearly recognisable, and that's a no-no. Unfortunately therefore, I don't think that there's anything you can do in the way of scanning to fix it.
Jgore From Argentina, joined Feb 2002, 550 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (12 years 10 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 3137 times:
what the hell? what about those clearly-visible pilots in those very pictures when they are cought taxiing and saying hello to the spotters ? THEY do are clearly visible to the people, so i don't se any deal with it, this is the same case.
Anyhow, i don't certanly understand this site's rules.
Hope it to be accepted.
As for the scanner, i think i can do a better scan since the other scanner i used was a very bad one.