Photopilot From Canada, joined Jul 2002, 2875 posts, RR: 18
Reply 1, posted
Sun Oct 6 2002 04:39:18 UTC (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 1185 times:
Can you post a link where the rest of us can read about the new proposed standard.
I have never heard of the JPEG 2000 standard yet.
JeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3267 posts, RR: 51
Reply 2, posted
Sun Oct 6 2002 07:04:02 UTC (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 1165 times:
I have tried the demo version and it looks great! File sizes are reduced dramatically with virtually no compression artifacts at all. I loved it. The problem was nothing I had other then the viewer that came with the demo could view the file. Just do a search for jpeg 2000. I believe that is how I got it. Sure hope this becomes a standard soon.
Skymonster From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted
Sun Oct 6 2002 09:48:19 UTC (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 1152 times:
The problem was nothing I had other then the viewer that came with the demo could view the file.
Well I suspect that if that's the case, we won't be seeing it here, at least not until most standard browsers can display the image.
Manzoori From UK - England, joined Sep 2002, 1516 posts, RR: 32
Reply 4, posted
Sun Oct 6 2002 11:16:47 UTC (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 1131 times:
Here are some links:
Flightlineimages DOT Com Photographer & Web Editor. RR Turbines Specialist
Granite From UK - Scotland, joined May 1999, 5602 posts, RR: 62
Reply 5, posted
Sun Oct 6 2002 14:38:44 UTC (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 1111 times:
I have recently been reading about another compression tool.
They claim that the compression of a 10mb photograph can result in a size of about 100k with very little loss in quality:
Haven't tried it yet.