Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Soft Pictures?  
User currently offlineMD From Finland, joined Oct 2001, 146 posts, RR: 0
Posted (12 years 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1024 times:

Hi,
I need a piece of advice. I sent you this picture and the screener rejected
it due to badblury. I would like to improve my pictures to meet your
standards but since I am not familier with graphics I would like to ask
you for advice and hints. So, could you please tell me what are the
means by which I can improve my photo-> http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=toivottavasti.jpg


I tried to improve my photo but it was rejected again. This time due to
Badsoft. http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=now_the_pic_is_a_bit-more_sharpened.jpg

My original photo is in 2560*1960 resolution, but I am not satisfied
with the sharpness. My camera is Sony F707.

Best Regards,

Ville Ripatti






///
3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCfalk From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (12 years 2 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 989 times:

This is pretty close. Remember that there are 54 pictures of this particular aircraft in the database. Had it had a lot fewer, it might have gotten accepted. But it is slightly on the soft side. I copied it into PhotoPaint but could not get it to look better - jaggies poppied up. But by working carefully with the original version, you might have more success.

Charles


User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 745 posts, RR: 16
Reply 2, posted (12 years 2 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 939 times:

As Charles points out this is a common subject, so would need to be VERY good to get in. The shot is blurry to start with - ie. the original image is not quite in focus, or more likely in this case, motion blur has occured - look at the reg on the fuselage, and esp. on the nose gear door (the nose just has to be sharp).

If the original is blurry, there is nothing you can do to save it - sharpening will, as in this case, just introduce sharpening articfacts and "jaggies". At a cursory glance, it might look sharper, but the detail just won't be there.

Bad soft is slightly different, and should be applied when the original image might be in focus, but it has not been properly processed - some digital cameras (or scanners for that matter), particularly the D30 & D60, produce a softish image straight out the camera - the photographer is expected to fine tune the image with sharpening tools to make the image appear crisp.

In general, the screeners are pretty good at distinguishing blur from soft, but sometimes it is hard to see which message best applies.

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineDazed767 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 5498 posts, RR: 51
Reply 3, posted (12 years 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 898 times:

Ville, if you send me the orginal, maybe I can work on it and see if it looks better. I also have the F707...

Justin
Dazed767@hotmail.com


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Soft And Dark? posted Sat Aug 25 2007 16:12:37 by DM
Soft Rejections posted Sat Aug 18 2007 01:32:33 by ThomasW1974
Monitor Died, Rejection For "soft"... posted Sun Aug 12 2007 20:38:14 by Walter2222
Some Twilight Pictures - Worth A Try? posted Thu Aug 9 2007 20:40:49 by Acontador
Old DTW Pictures posted Sun Aug 5 2007 08:48:50 by RedTailDTW
Behind The Scene Pictures Of Endeavour posted Fri Aug 3 2007 06:55:41 by Eksath
A Chance For These Two Pictures posted Sun Jul 22 2007 16:22:09 by Carlos
Just How Bad Are These Two Pictures? posted Thu Jul 19 2007 01:22:19 by N62NA
Riat 2007 Pictures - Good Enough? posted Sun Jul 15 2007 13:17:14 by A320ajm
Is This Too Soft? posted Thu Jul 12 2007 22:21:02 by AirKas1