Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
D60 And EOS3 Pictures Compared. Film Or Digital?  
User currently offlineFotodj From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 87 posts, RR: 0
Posted (11 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 3041 times:

I took two pictures of the same airplane using identical lens (Canon 100-400 IS) and different bodies: Canon D60 and Canon EOS 3 .
If you are interested which is better looking ,you can check it going to :

http://fotodj.com/pages/compared.htm

I hope this might be helpful for those who wants to go digital.

PS. Be patient if you have dial-up connection - page will be loaded few minutes.

Derek


Polishman in New York
6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineShawn Patrick From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 2607 posts, RR: 17
Reply 1, posted (11 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 3024 times:

Nice comparison, digital is definetly the way to go if you want your pictures on airliners.net

User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 52
Reply 2, posted (11 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 3028 times:

Derek,

I like the D60 image better, hands down. I would not add the grain. Photographers have been trying for decades to eliminate grain as I am sure you know.

Great shots, and thanks for the comparison.

v/r
Jeff


User currently offlinePPGMD From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 2453 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (11 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 3019 times:

Well would have been a better comparison if it was from a bracketed Provia or Velvia frame, but it does show the smoothness of the colors from the digitals. Though frames have one advantage compared to digital, they still have quite a bit more detail (I think someone calculated it to be 22MP) which to date no digital camera can capture. Myself I am going to wait (even if I could afford it) until the full frame cameras get the speed that I desire (looking for about 4-6fps until the memory card is full).


At worst, you screw up and die.
User currently offlineDazed767 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 5486 posts, RR: 51
Reply 4, posted (11 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 3021 times:

digital is definetly the way to go if you want your pictures on airliners.net

No way, slides still have better detail. Of course we would all love smooth, no grain photos from a D60, but I think in 3-5 years quality will be even better, and the price will drop more. For the most part I still shoot slides, I have the F707, but use it for things like flight deck shots/cabin etc.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Dean Allchin


And if Dean is producing shots like this from print film, digital has a looong way to go!  Big grin


User currently offlinePPGMD From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 2453 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (11 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 3019 times:

Astia is slide film. Isn't Dean the guy that does the Medium Format airliners stuff?


At worst, you screw up and die.
User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 713 posts, RR: 16
Reply 6, posted (11 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 2987 times:

I think someone calculated it to be 22MP - yes I've seen that figure as well based on the ability of slide film (K64) to resolve detail (ability to distinguish 2 adjacent lines), but my understanding is that this is a "theoretical" capability which could only be acheived using a high quality prime lens at optimum aperture with the camera mounted on a secure tripod.

In practice, I'm not sure many of us operate in conditions which would allow this optimum resolution to be acheived.

But more to the point, this has meaning only if the slide is the desired end product. Even projecting the slide results in a loss of resolution unless you are using the finest projecting equipment - to produce prints or images for the web introduces another stage of production with an inevitable loss of quality.

It has been suggested that a high quality drum scan of a 35mm slide can produce around 12-14mp of meaningful data (ie. after data created by grain & noise is eliminated), and of course even high end prosumer scanners will not match this.

So I would suggest that while film has a theoretical advantage over digital, in practice, the current crop of DSLRs are capable of producing "finished" images matching or exceeding quality possible from scanned film.

Cheers

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Film Or Digital? posted Wed Jan 15 2003 02:55:40 by L.1011
Good Places To Spot And Take Pictures At SMF? posted Mon Jul 24 2006 04:51:45 by BA286
Transferring Film To Digital posted Tue Jan 17 2006 15:29:42 by Dcz00
Your History - Film & Digital posted Fri Aug 27 2004 22:07:46 by Ryangooner
D60 And CF - Compatible Brands Please posted Mon May 12 2003 15:05:17 by JetTrader
Canon EOS D60, And 10D posted Tue Apr 8 2003 05:28:47 by Sokol
SLR Or Digital? posted Fri Jul 19 2002 17:08:15 by Che
New D60 And Taipei Photography posted Tue Jun 11 2002 14:24:09 by Hkg_clk
Film Vs Digital Again posted Fri Dec 7 2001 12:11:11 by Ckw
New SLR Or Digital At The Moment? posted Fri May 4 2001 17:11:39 by Blackened