OH-LZA From Finland, joined Jun 2001, 1000 posts, RR: 4 Posted (12 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 3636 times:
I am planning to buy either the Nikkor AF-S 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5G IF-ED or the Nikkor AF 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5D IF. The 24-85mm has a Silent Wave Motor and according to my understanding better optics, but the 28-105mm a larger focal length at the tele end, which is more important to me. I am not planning to use the lens I buy for just aviation photography.
What do you think of these two and which one would you recommend me to buy?
Apart from either of these I'm planning to buy a Nikkor AF 50mm f/1.8D.
Sia jubilee From Hong Kong, joined Feb 2000, 145 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (12 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 3568 times:
Yes, 24-85 AF-S is much more SMARTER!!!!!
Thinking of 105mm is not so this "long as 85mm.
but 24mm is definitely wider than 28mm.
my experience! You should have a 70-300/80-200 lens as well, right?
so 70/80 thru 105mm is overlap.
OH-LZA From Finland, joined Jun 2001, 1000 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (12 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 3511 times:
I would use this lens for other photography than aviation too, and don't want to carry an 80-200mm all the time when I only need like 100mm. I can't really imagine a situation where I'd need 24mm, but can certainly imagine situations where I would need 105mm.