Sudden From Sweden, joined Jul 2001, 4132 posts, RR: 5
Reply 11, posted (12 years 4 months 3 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 5749 times:
basic lesson comming up!
The wings are not pointing straight out from the A/C, but are swept back, so take a wild guess where no.1 is.
I just gave you the answer, so lets see if you can bust this quiz.
Chris28_17 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 1439 posts, RR: 9
Reply 19, posted (12 years 4 months 3 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 5704 times:
So what, he's wrong it's not fake.
i have no problem with people posting "fake pictures" accusations on here, as long as it can easily be proven otherwise then what's the big deal? He was very respectful in his post as well, and i kinda like knowing someone is keeping us in check. I get accused of my pics being "fake" via email all the time, who cares?? i dont send them a nasty email telling them "how dare you accuse me of that!"
Please, please for God's sake stop this.
This thread has gone way beyond ridiculous.
no it hasnt. So what?? it's not fake, the guy "migman" thought it was and he was wrong, im sure he can be a man and accept it.
Thomasphoto60 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 4071 posts, RR: 26
Reply 20, posted (12 years 4 months 3 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 5696 times:
Sigh.........here we go again!
Yo Migman (Jamie), instead of accusing one of A.Net's more respected photographers of faking in a public forum, why not e-mail him first and ask about the photo in question? Did that ever cross you mind ? Perhaps you were thinking that you were going to make a big splash here and expose an evil 'faker'. If so well you are about find out the hard way that making such acqusations will quickly blow up in your face as a few others implied earlier in this thread.
Making charges of faking a photo without proof is a big NO-NO here and can get both parties into trouble! Just because you can not figure out how a pic was made does not give you the all clear to accuse anyone of faking anything! Especially someone with AirNikon's reputation and history.
You appear to be new to this particular forum (I suppose most of your other 62 posts were elsewhere), however ingnorance is not an acceptable substitute for common sense. You have not made a very good first impression with many here and short of a formal apology to AirNikon it may be sometime before you are trusted by the regular participants here. Not a great way to introduce yourself to the Photographers forum!
Atco From Canada, joined Jul 2001, 277 posts, RR: 22
Reply 22, posted (12 years 4 months 3 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 5693 times:
No sir, what you are doing is accusing someone of planting a fake photo in a very public way when it very obviously is not fake.
Then not content with hearing from some very knowledgable people, you continued this nonsense based on the opinions of the office, when frankly a very large line should have been drawn under this whole discussion.
So, sorry you felt the response was childish, but it was appropriate for the level of discussion.
Now please accept this is not a fake photo and leave it at that?