Yet Another Screening Question...
Ljungdahl From Sweden, joined Apr 2002, 903 posts, RR: 38 Posted Tue Oct 15 2002 19:32:01 UTC (11 years 4 months 4 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 2420 times:
First of all, I must say that the screeners are doing a great job here!
I usually read the posts around how this process works, and I've believed that I understood it quite well...
...but I now realize that I not understand it fully.
I've uploaded a photo a few days ago, it's HQ'ed, and so far there's nothing unusual...
...but the strange thing is, that I have uploaded more photos after that one, and they have been accepted (most of them) and rejected (one), and it's cool, I have no problem with that.
...what I mean is, I have uploaded 2-3 photos, had them online the next day, uploaded a few more, again online a short time after, more uploads, same thing again...
...but the original HQ photo is still there, might this have something to do with that I've reuploaded it after a rejection (badangle, 1 degree off...), I corrected the angle and reuploaded the pic...
I repeat, it's no criticism, I just don't understand the way this particular case works!
PUnmuth@VIE From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 4162 posts, RR: 55
Reply 1, posted
Tue Oct 15 2002 19:42:34 UTC (11 years 4 months 4 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 2394 times:
Tzhe mechanism is called priority instant add.
If we see a picture which is a clear addition even without the need of three screeners to vote for it we cann add it instantly to the DB.
Thats why your younger picture pased the older ones.
Ljungdahl From Sweden, joined Apr 2002, 903 posts, RR: 38
Reply 2, posted
Tue Oct 15 2002 19:58:02 UTC (11 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 2383 times:
OK, thx for the info, Peter.