Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Aerial Photos...  
User currently offlineMirage From Portugal, joined May 1999, 3125 posts, RR: 14
Posted (12 years 1 week 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 2056 times:

Now it's my time to be a little upset. I tried hard to get this aerial photo accepted:

http://www.pbase.com/image/336858

(I uploaded a high quality scan, not this version)

People here told me there is no airport and no aircraft wing visible so it couldn't be accepted. I've agreed with this opinions and gave up on this photo.

Now I see this one, with no airport or aircraft wing and it's accepted:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Jean



So, I'm a little upset and had to tell it.

Luis
P.S. I'll not make a big problem from this as I know the human side of the acceptance criteria but I still didn't forget.

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDC-10 Levo From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2001, 3432 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (12 years 1 week 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 2012 times:

No aircraft wing or engine there!
That photo will probabaly get deleted now. Try to upload your image again and see what they say.

DC-10


User currently offlineMikephotos From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 2923 posts, RR: 54
Reply 2, posted (12 years 1 week 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 2014 times:

Luis,

You could always do with AirNikon does, "photoshop" in an engine  Smile

Michael


User currently offlineEGFF From UK - Wales, joined Sep 2001, 2201 posts, RR: 12
Reply 3, posted (12 years 1 week 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 1991 times:

Luis, i understand your frustration especially when your pic was rejected for such reasons, and one of the same calibre gets on at a later stage  Sad
EGFF



All together or not at all
User currently offlineNonRevKing From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (12 years 1 week 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 1967 times:

Sorry I missed this post, and posted one of my own:

Hey guys,

I was just looking through the "top 24-48" and noticed the photo at the bottom. Just wondering if it's cool to upload photos of landmarks taken in flight now? I've got some great shots I've been wanting to upload, but they don't have part of the plane or an airport in the shot...Have the reigns been loosened on this type of shot?

Thanks for the help...
Brian


Haven't got a response from a screener yet, are these cool now or was this a mistake? I got pics ready to be scanned  Big grin



User currently offlineEGGD From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 12443 posts, RR: 35
Reply 5, posted (12 years 1 week 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 1938 times:

Also, its quite clearly not level. I was told abruptly in a rejection message that a photograph taken from a window must be level with the horizon (just like my previous window shot in the d/b, along with other peoples that have been added within the past 6 months or so).

Regards

Dan


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Tripoli Intl Airport (TIP / HLLT) Aerial Photos posted Wed Apr 21 2004 10:50:18 by Aviator9H
Aerial Photos Of Ground Zero. posted Fri Oct 18 2002 01:34:33 by Mirrodie
Aerial Photos... posted Tue Oct 15 2002 21:18:11 by Mirage
Aerial Photos... posted Mon Jul 8 2002 20:23:40 by Mirage
Aerial Photo Shoot - What Should I Charge? posted Mon Nov 27 2006 04:14:19 by AndrewUber
Opinions On These Photos posted Sun Nov 26 2006 07:31:45 by Longhornmaniac
Acceptability Of Rare Photos? Part 2. posted Sun Nov 12 2006 15:53:30 by Alibo5NGN
A380 Crosswind Photos. Good Enough? posted Sat Nov 11 2006 21:07:43 by BaldurSveins
Acceptability Of Rare Photos? posted Tue Nov 7 2006 16:34:56 by Alibo5NGN
Top Rated Photos posted Wed Nov 1 2006 15:11:18 by Javibi