Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Horizon? The Reference Point? An Example...  
User currently offlineLennymuir From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2002, 434 posts, RR: 6
Posted (11 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 1752 times:

Have a look at this one. "Angle of the camera etc etc"
( BTW, I am not going to appeal. )

You win some, you lose some ( who loses  Wink/being sarcastic hee hee! )
I don't get many rejects, so I've got no problems sharing this one with you.
The 'other' site rejected it too, Well well, I wonder who? Are you reading this young man?  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=ec-hjq-edi-26-10-2002-f707.jpg

Check the trees. If I had the camera at a bad angle, they should be leaning to the left, shouldn't they? Take a note of the ones, especially at the right hand side, actually leaning slightly to the right.

We've had a heck of a lot of rain here recently and don't forget, it's the rain here that makes our whisky, so it they're leaning slightly to one side, that's okay!  Big thumbs up

You might also have noticed I didn't put a 'comment' in the remarks field to state that the pilot
...dived at the last minute to get onto the runway...
which he/she did do actually. The visual approach wasn't very good. Those of use watching/shooting that B737 did remark that his/her landing was very dodgy to say the least. (I wasn't listening to the radio, so the gender of the co/pilot is unknown)  Wink/being sarcastic  Wink/being sarcastic

If I added a comment, would it make any difference?

Anyway, I won't straighten and resubmit it either, that would be cheating!

Cheers!

Gerry






The quality does look a bit iffy too... hmm....


5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 52
Reply 1, posted (11 years 9 months 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 1676 times:

Gerry,
In my opinion as a viewer of the photo, a comment about the 'dive' would explain the somewhat un-natural approach angle. Sometimes a little explanation of the situation adds to the photo. I liked it.

v/r
Jeff


User currently offlineGerardo From Spain, joined May 2000, 3481 posts, RR: 31
Reply 2, posted (11 years 9 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 1627 times:

Scary, to say the least  Wow! !

I agree with Jeff, a little bit more info would help the screeners (possibly) and certainly the viewer.

Gerardo



dominguez(dash)online(dot)ch ... Pushing the limits of my equipment
User currently offlineCfalk From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (11 years 9 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 1628 times:

That's a tough one. Without a reference, it's hard to justify the angle. If there had been a light pole, or a few good tree trunks, it would have helped. Of course, an explanation in the remarks would probably have swung the benefit of the doubt to your favor.

Charles


User currently offlineEGGD From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 12443 posts, RR: 35
Reply 4, posted (11 years 9 months 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 1578 times:

Looks like some of the trees are not vertical. But I trust your judgment  Big grin. It does look, to a screener, that the scenery and the land and the aircraft are heading the same way, and that the photo musn't be straight.



User currently offlineLennymuir From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2002, 434 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (11 years 9 months 4 weeks ago) and read 1550 times:

Thanks:

I like your comment Charles : 'a few good tree trunks'  Big thumbs up

I'll try a repeat of that shot during the winter (very very soon) once those trees have dropped their leaves....

Cheers

Gerry


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Bad Camera Angle, Where Is The Reference? posted Thu May 5 2005 22:14:16 by Fergulmcc
Handling The End Of An Aircraft posted Thu Aug 26 2004 18:48:54 by Bigphilnyc
After The EOS 300D, An EOS 3000D? posted Wed Jan 14 2004 10:07:45 by UTA_FLYingHIGH
Getting Inside The Plane With An SLR posted Sun May 18 2003 14:00:46 by Lugonza_2001
Does Sigma Have An Equivalent To The Canon L? posted Tue Mar 6 2007 16:21:09 by YHU
An Alternative To The RS-60E3 posted Mon Sep 25 2006 01:04:01 by NicolasRubio
Angles And The Horizon? posted Fri Jul 14 2006 06:07:42 by KLGAviation
Which Is The Better Choice For An Upload? posted Fri Mar 17 2006 18:23:24 by Parsival
Best Point And Shoot For On-the-go Spotting? posted Thu Feb 23 2006 19:49:37 by CFIjames
Is There An Alternative To The Canon 350D? posted Tue Feb 7 2006 23:49:25 by Jorge1812