Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Sigma SD9 Review  
User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9823 posts, RR: 64
Posted (13 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 2108 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!


"Resolution is indeed higher than one would expect from a 3.4 megapixel sensor, but not quite on a par with the current crop of 6 megapixel SLRs from Canon, Fuji, and Nikon."

Plus I have to add, the thing sure looks "cheap."

3 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineVaman From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 328 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (13 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 2091 times:

Well *ehhem*,

it IS cheap. That is the point of Sigma. With an MSRP of 1799 and an undoubtably plumetting price as with all sigma's, it is very very very cheap.


User currently offlineShawn Patrick From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 2610 posts, RR: 15
Reply 2, posted (13 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 1725 times:

You have to realize that this is new technology. While a 6 megapixel sensor will still deliver more detail from Sigma's new 3.4 megapixel sensor, if (when) that sensor is increased to 6 megapixels, it will put the current 6 megapixel sensors to shame.

User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3267 posts, RR: 50
Reply 3, posted (13 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 1724 times:

It is actually 3 separate 3.4 mp sensors "stacked" on top of each other. Each sensitive to it's own color. Better? Time will tell. From the review, it looks like the camera has it's problems.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Anyone Here Using The Sigma SD9? posted Sat Jun 28 2003 02:04:49 by Patroni
Sigma SD9 - Impressive! posted Wed Nov 27 2002 14:31:10 by Scooter
Sigma 135-400 Review posted Wed Feb 14 2007 06:52:47 by ANITIX87
Sigma 50-500 EX - My Review posted Mon May 16 2005 04:17:53 by Mikec
Sigma 50-500mm Lens Help! Differences posted Mon May 28 2007 18:10:05 by BmiBaby737
Canon 15mm Fisheye: Review Please posted Wed May 23 2007 15:43:34 by Deaphen
What If To Choose: Canon 500mm Or Sigma 300-800mm? posted Tue May 22 2007 00:53:08 by Xenon
Sigma 18-200. Opinions? posted Wed May 9 2007 15:23:55 by LIPH
Sigma 50-150 F/2.8 posted Mon Apr 2 2007 01:08:35 by Andrej
Does Sigma Have An Equivalent To The Canon L? posted Tue Mar 6 2007 16:21:09 by YHU